Development of severe psychological distress among low-income individuals during the COVID-19 pandemic: longitudinal study.
Novel coronavirus
general population
inequality
mental health
socioeconomic status
Journal
BJPsych open
ISSN: 2056-4724
Titre abrégé: BJPsych Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101667931
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
15 Feb 2021
15 Feb 2021
Historique:
entrez:
15
2
2021
pubmed:
16
2
2021
medline:
16
2
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
It has been indicated that the health impact of COVID-19 is potentially greater in individuals from lower socioeconomic status than in the overall population. To examine how the spread of COVID-19 has altered the general public's mental health, and whether such changes differ in relation to individual income. An online longitudinal survey was conducted at three different time periods during the pandemic. We recruited 1993 people aged 20-70 years, living in the Tokyo metropolitan area in Japan. Participants' mental health was measured with the six-item version of the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale; the existence of severe psychological distress was ascertained through the cut-off data. Multiple logistic and mixed-model ordinal logistic regression analyses were performed, with income as the independent variable. Of the participants, 985 were male, with a mean age of 50.5 (±15.8) years. Severe psychological distress percentages for each tested period were 9.3%, 11.2% and 10.7% for phases 1, 2 and 3, respectively. Between phases 1 and 2 or phases 2 and 3, the group that earned <£15 000 had significantly higher propensity to develop severe psychological distress than the group that earned ≥£45 000 (odds ratio 2.09, 95% CI 0.95-4.56 between phases 1 and 2; odds ratio 3.00, 95% CI 1.01-9.58 between phases 2 and 3). Although there has been significant deterioration in mental health among citizens during the COVID-19 pandemic, this was more significant among those with lower income. Therefore, mental health measures that focus on low socioeconomic groups may be necessary.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
It has been indicated that the health impact of COVID-19 is potentially greater in individuals from lower socioeconomic status than in the overall population.
AIMS
OBJECTIVE
To examine how the spread of COVID-19 has altered the general public's mental health, and whether such changes differ in relation to individual income.
METHOD
METHODS
An online longitudinal survey was conducted at three different time periods during the pandemic. We recruited 1993 people aged 20-70 years, living in the Tokyo metropolitan area in Japan. Participants' mental health was measured with the six-item version of the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale; the existence of severe psychological distress was ascertained through the cut-off data. Multiple logistic and mixed-model ordinal logistic regression analyses were performed, with income as the independent variable.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Of the participants, 985 were male, with a mean age of 50.5 (±15.8) years. Severe psychological distress percentages for each tested period were 9.3%, 11.2% and 10.7% for phases 1, 2 and 3, respectively. Between phases 1 and 2 or phases 2 and 3, the group that earned <£15 000 had significantly higher propensity to develop severe psychological distress than the group that earned ≥£45 000 (odds ratio 2.09, 95% CI 0.95-4.56 between phases 1 and 2; odds ratio 3.00, 95% CI 1.01-9.58 between phases 2 and 3).
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Although there has been significant deterioration in mental health among citizens during the COVID-19 pandemic, this was more significant among those with lower income. Therefore, mental health measures that focus on low socioeconomic groups may be necessary.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33583484
doi: 10.1192/bjo.2021.5
pii: S2056472421000053
pmc: PMC7884661
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e50Références
Pers Individ Dif. 2021 Jan 1;168:110371
pubmed: 32904342
J Affect Disord. 2020 Oct 1;275:109-111
pubmed: 32658811
Lancet Psychiatry. 2020 Jun;7(6):468-471
pubmed: 32330430
Int J Surg. 2020 Jun;78:185-193
pubmed: 32305533
Lancet. 2005 Mar 19-25;365(9464):1099-104
pubmed: 15781105
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2008;17(3):152-8
pubmed: 18763695
Lancet. 2020 Feb 22;395(10224):e37-e38
pubmed: 32043982
J Vocat Behav. 2020 Jun;119:103436
pubmed: 32390656
Lancet. 2020 Apr 18;395(10232):1243-1244
pubmed: 32305087
World Psychiatry. 2018 Feb;17(1):76-89
pubmed: 29352539
Asian J Psychiatr. 2020 Aug;52:102066
pubmed: 32302935
Suicide Life Threat Behav. 1992 Summer;22(2):240-54
pubmed: 1626335
Lancet. 2020 May 23;395(10237):1587
pubmed: 32446399
Lancet Psychiatry. 2020 Oct;7(10):883-892
pubmed: 32707037
Biometrics. 1994 Dec;50(4):933-44
pubmed: 7787006
JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Jun 1;180(6):817-818
pubmed: 32275292
Crisis. 2010;31(2):86-92
pubmed: 20418214
Int J Infect Dis. 2020 May;94:139-144
pubmed: 32283285
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2003 Feb;60(2):184-9
pubmed: 12578436
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2020 Nov;28(11):1200-1204
pubmed: 32561276
JAMA. 2020 May 19;323(19):1891-1892
pubmed: 32293639
Ann Epidemiol. 2009 Mar;19(3):202-9
pubmed: 19217003
Brain Behav Immun. 2020 Jul;87:40-48
pubmed: 32298802
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020 Jul;163(1):65-66
pubmed: 32366172
Br J Psychiatry. 2020 Oct;217(4):540-542
pubmed: 32493516