The Practice of Experimental Psychology: An Inevitably Postmodern Endeavor.

experiment experimental psychology methodology philosophy of science postmodernism

Journal

Frontiers in psychology
ISSN: 1664-1078
Titre abrégé: Front Psychol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101550902

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2020
Historique:
received: 30 09 2020
accepted: 26 11 2020
entrez: 15 2 2021
pubmed: 16 2 2021
medline: 16 2 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The aim of psychology is to understand the human mind and behavior. In contemporary psychology, the method of choice to accomplish this incredibly complex endeavor is the experiment. This dominance has shaped the whole discipline from the self-concept as an empirical science and its very epistemological and theoretical foundations, via research practice and the scientific discourse to teaching. Experimental psychology is grounded in the scientific method and positivism, and these principles, which are characteristic for modern thinking, are still upheld. Despite this apparently stalwart adherence to modern principles, experimental psychology exhibits a number of aspects which can best be described as facets of postmodern thinking although they are hardly acknowledged as such. Many psychologists take pride in being "real natural scientists" because they conduct experiments, but it is particularly difficult for psychologists to evade certain elements of postmodern thinking in view of the specific nature of their subject matter. Postmodernism as a philosophy emerged in the 20th century as a response to the perceived inadequacy of the modern approach and as a means to understand the complexities, ambiguities, and contradictions of the times. Therefore, postmodernism offers both valuable insights into the very nature of experimental psychology and fruitful ideas on improving experimental practice to better reflect the complexities and ambiguities of human mind and behavior. Analyzing experimental psychology along postmodern lines begins by discussing the implications of transferring the scientific method from fields with rather narrowly defined phenomena-the natural sciences-to a much broader and more heterogeneous class of complex phenomena, namely the human mind and behavior. This ostensibly modern experimental approach is, however,

Identifiants

pubmed: 33584447
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.612805
pmc: PMC7874201
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Pagination

612805

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 Mayrhofer, Kuhbandner and Lindner.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Références

Trends Cogn Sci. 2013 Aug;17(8):391-400
pubmed: 23850263
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2018 Jul;80(5):1035-1056
pubmed: 29687357
Front Psychol. 2019 Oct 04;10:2246
pubmed: 31636589
Cogn Psychol. 2020 Sep;121:101305
pubmed: 32531272
Am Psychol. 2002 Jun-Jul;57(6-7):456-7
pubmed: 12094453
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2016 Jun;50(2):185-95
pubmed: 26712604
Am Psychol. 2002 Jun-Jul;57(6-7):463-4
pubmed: 12094461
Nature. 1997 Nov 20;390(6657):279-81
pubmed: 9384378
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2019 Jul;102:251-263
pubmed: 31059730
Am Psychol. 2002 Jun-Jul;57(6-7):462
pubmed: 12094459
J Vis. 2011 May 26;11(5):4
pubmed: 21617025
Brain. 1983 Sep;106 (Pt 3):623-42
pubmed: 6640273
J Vis. 2019 May 1;19(5):3
pubmed: 31058989
Science. 1949 Sep 30;110(2857):319-27
pubmed: 17770342
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2014 Jan;9(1):59-71
pubmed: 26173241
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Jul 5;113(27):7459-64
pubmed: 27325767
Am Psychol. 2002 Jun-Jul;57(6-7):458
pubmed: 12094455
J Am Psychoanal Assoc. 2007 Winter;55(1):177-97
pubmed: 17432496
Front Psychol. 2020 Sep 17;11:545959
pubmed: 33041913
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2014 Apr;143(2):548-65
pubmed: 23937181
Nat Neurosci. 2014 Mar;17(3):347-56
pubmed: 24569831
Am Psychol. 2001 Oct;56(10):803-13
pubmed: 11675987
Front Hum Neurosci. 2016 Jun 01;10:262
pubmed: 27313524
J Am Acad Psychoanal. 1995 Winter;23(4):525-43
pubmed: 8809719

Auteurs

Roland Mayrhofer (R)

Department of Psychology, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.

Christof Kuhbandner (C)

Department of Psychology, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.

Corinna Lindner (C)

Department of Psychology, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.

Classifications MeSH