Vitamin D in Follicular Fluid Correlates With the Euploid Status of Blastocysts in a Vitamin D Deficient Population.
% free 25(OH)D
25(OH)D
PGT-A
bioavailable 25(OH)D
follicular fluid
free 25(OH)D
Journal
Frontiers in endocrinology
ISSN: 1664-2392
Titre abrégé: Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101555782
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
23
09
2020
accepted:
03
12
2020
entrez:
15
2
2021
pubmed:
16
2
2021
medline:
27
5
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The widespread distribution of the Vitamin D (VitD) receptor in reproductive tissues suggests an important role for VitD in human reproduction. The assessment of patient´s VitD is based on the 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) metabolite measurement. However, most of the circulating 25(OH)D is bound to either VitD-binding protein (VDBP) (88%) or albumin (12%) and less than 1% circulates free. To determine a possible correlation between VitD levels in serum (S) and follicular fluid (FF) and blastocyst ploidy status in patients undergoing infertility treatment. A prospective observational study was performed including couples planned for preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A) from ART Fertility Clinics. Patients were classified according to their 25(OH)D-Serum levels: VitD deficient group <20 ng/ml and insufficient/replete ≥20 ng/ml defined as VitD non-deficient group. Serum samples and 226 FF from individual follicles were collected for 25(OH)D, bioavailable 25(OH)D, free 25(OH)D, and % free 25(OH)D measurement. 25(OH)D-Serum in VitD deficient and non-deficient were 13.2±4.0 ng/ml vs 32.3±9.2 ng/ml; p<0.001. FF from 40 and 74 biopsied blastocysts was analysed of which 52.5 and 60.8% were euploid (p = 0.428), respectively. In VitD deficient patients, mean 25(OH)D-FF, bioavailable 25(OH)D-FF, and free 25(OH)D-FF were higher in euploid vs aneuploid blastocysts (18.3±6.3 ng/ml vs 13.9±4.8 ng/ml; p = 0.040; 1.5±0.5 ng/ml vs 1.1±0.4 ng/ml; p = 0.015; 0.005±0.002 ng/ml vs 0.003±0.001 ng/ml; p = 0.023, respectively), whilst no differences were found in VitD non-deficient patients (37.9±12.3 ng/ml vs 40.6±13.7 ng/ml; p = 0.380; 3.1±1.1 ng/ml vs 3.3±1.2 ng/ml; p = 0.323; 0.01±0.003 ng/ml vs 0.01±0.004 ng/ml; p = 0.319, respectively). VitD non-deficient patients have a significantly higher probability of obtaining a euploid blastocyst compared to VitD deficient patients (OR:33.36, p = 0.002).
Identifiants
pubmed: 33584542
doi: 10.3389/fendo.2020.609524
pmc: PMC7874043
doi:
Substances chimiques
Hydroxycholecalciferols
0
Vitamin D
1406-16-2
Types de publication
Journal Article
Observational Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
609524Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 Arnanz, De Munck, El Khatib, Bayram, Abdala, Melado, Lawrenz, Coughlan, Pacheco, Garcia-Velasco and Fatemi.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
Hum Reprod Update. 2014 Jan-Feb;20(1):124-40
pubmed: 24077980
Am Fam Physician. 2018 Feb 15;97(4):226-227
pubmed: 29671531
Int J Mol Sci. 2016 Apr 06;17(4):372
pubmed: 27058533
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Feb;208(2):137.e1-13
pubmed: 23131462
J Reprod Fertil. 1991 Jan;91(1):59-64
pubmed: 1995862
Endocr Pract. 2017 May;23(5):605-613
pubmed: 28095044
Ann Agric Environ Med. 2016 Sep 27;23(4):671-676
pubmed: 28030942
Fertil Steril. 2014 Dec;102(6):1608-12
pubmed: 25256926
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011 Nov;159(1):132-7
pubmed: 21835540
Fertil Steril. 2014 Feb;101(2):447-52
pubmed: 24210230
Eur J Endocrinol. 2012 May;166(5):765-78
pubmed: 22275473
Hum Reprod. 2014 Sep;29(9):2032-40
pubmed: 24951484
Br J Nutr. 2009 Feb;101(4):487-91
pubmed: 18631414
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2019 Apr;36(4):661-665
pubmed: 30685837
Hum Reprod. 2018 Jan 1;33(1):65-80
pubmed: 29149263
Ann Nutr Metab. 2012;61(3):199-206
pubmed: 23183289
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 1999 Jun;11(3):307-11
pubmed: 10369209
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2018 Feb;35(2):331-337
pubmed: 29063502
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011 Jul;96(7):1911-30
pubmed: 21646368
Osteoporos Int. 1998;8 Suppl 2:S13-9
pubmed: 10197177
Fertil Steril. 2010 Sep;94(4):1314-1319
pubmed: 19589516
Int J Reprod Biomed. 2019 Nov 07;17(10):685-708
pubmed: 31807718
N Engl J Med. 2013 Nov 21;369(21):1991-2000
pubmed: 24256378
Reprod Biomed Online. 2015 Dec;31(6):760-9
pubmed: 26520420
Nutrients. 2018 Apr 13;10(4):
pubmed: 29652819
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2016 May;101(5):2226-34
pubmed: 27007693
Reprod Biomed Online. 2017 Aug;35(2):139-144
pubmed: 28625761
Fertil Steril. 2012 Jul;98(1):228-34
pubmed: 22494925
Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2010 Jul 28;8:91
pubmed: 20667111
Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2009 May 04;7:40
pubmed: 19413899
Hum Reprod. 2012 Nov;27(11):3321-7
pubmed: 22914766
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Mar;212(3):315.e1-6
pubmed: 25265402
Endocr Rev. 1989 Aug;10(3):232-74
pubmed: 2673754
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2019 May 28;10:317
pubmed: 31191450
Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2018 Feb 09;16(1):13
pubmed: 29426322
J Clin Invest. 1986 Sep;78(3):748-52
pubmed: 3745436
J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2019 Jun;190:29-36
pubmed: 30904637
Bone. 2002 May;30(5):771-7
pubmed: 11996918
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014 Nov;99(11):E2372-6
pubmed: 25121462
Fertil Steril. 2018 Sep;110(4):761-766.e1
pubmed: 30196974
Endocrinology. 2000 Apr;141(4):1317-24
pubmed: 10746634
J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2014 Oct;144 Pt A:132-7
pubmed: 24095930
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 Nov 1;19(1):395
pubmed: 31675919
Neuro Endocrinol Lett. 2013;34(8):756-62
pubmed: 24522025
Fertil Steril. 2014 Aug;102(2):460-468.e3
pubmed: 24933120
Nutrients. 2019 May 10;11(5):
pubmed: 31083424
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012 Jul;97(7):2450-5
pubmed: 22508713
Hum Reprod. 2018 Sep 1;33(9):1602-1618
pubmed: 30052961
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2014 Jan;289(1):201-6
pubmed: 23880888
J Med Genet. 2014 Aug;51(8):553-62
pubmed: 25031024
Am J Clin Nutr. 2016 Sep;104(3):729-35
pubmed: 27465382
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2018 Jul;35(7):1265-1276
pubmed: 29774457
Hum Reprod. 2017 Jan;32(1):208-214
pubmed: 27927849