Detecting Corticospinal Tract Impairment in Tumor Patients With Fiber Density and Tensor-Based Metrics.
apparent diffusion coefficient
corticospinal tract
diffusion magnetic resonance imaging
motor function
tractography
transcranial magnetic stimulation
tumor
Journal
Frontiers in oncology
ISSN: 2234-943X
Titre abrégé: Front Oncol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101568867
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
28
10
2020
accepted:
14
12
2020
entrez:
15
2
2021
pubmed:
16
2
2021
medline:
16
2
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Tumors infiltrating the motor system lead to significant disability, often caused by corticospinal tract injury. The delineation of the healthy-pathological white matter (WM) interface area, for which diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (dMRI) has shown promising potential, may improve treatment outcome. However, up to 90% of white matter (WM) voxels include multiple fiber populations, which cannot be correctly described with traditional metrics such as fractional anisotropy (FA) or apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC). Here, we used a novel fixel-based along-tract analysis consisting of constrained spherical deconvolution (CSD)-based probabilistic tractography and fixel-based apparent fiber density (FD), capable of identifying fiber orientation specific microstructural metrics. We addressed this novel methodology's capability to detect corticospinal tract impairment. We measured and compared tractogram-related FD and traditional microstructural metrics bihemispherically in 65 patients with WHO grade III and IV gliomas infiltrating the motor system. The cortical tractogram seeds were based on motor maps derived by transcranial magnetic stimulation. We extracted 100 equally distributed cross-sections along each streamline of corticospinal tract (CST) for along-tract statistical analysis. Cross-sections were then analyzed to detect differences between healthy and pathological hemispheres. All metrics showed significant differences between healthy and pathologic hemispheres over the entire tract and between peritumoral segments. Peritumoral values were lower for FA and FD, but higher for ADC within the entire cohort. FD was more specific to tumor-induced changes in CST than ADC or FA, whereas ADC and FA showed higher sensitivity. The bihemispheric along-tract analysis provides an approach to detect subject-specific structural changes in healthy and pathological WM. In the current clinical dataset, the more complex FD metrics did not outperform FA and ADC in terms of describing corticospinal tract impairment.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33585250
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.622358
pmc: PMC7873606
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
622358Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 Fekonja, Wang, Aydogan, Roine, Engelhardt, Dreyer, Vajkoczy and Picht.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
Neuroimage. 2016 Nov 15;142:394-406
pubmed: 27523449
Neuroimage. 2003 Oct;20(2):870-88
pubmed: 14568458
Neuroimage. 2019 Nov 15;202:116137
pubmed: 31473352
Neurosurgery. 2011 Sep;69(3):581-8; discussion 588
pubmed: 21430587
Neurophysiol Clin. 2016 Apr;46(2):125-33
pubmed: 27229765
Neuroimage. 2014 Oct 15;100:176-91
pubmed: 24936681
Neuroimage. 2004 Nov;23(3):1176-85
pubmed: 15528117
Front Oncol. 2016 Dec 21;6:261
pubmed: 28066717
Med Image Anal. 2015 Aug;24(1):269-281
pubmed: 25660002
Neuroimage. 2017 Jan 1;144(Pt A):58-73
pubmed: 27639350
Magn Reson Med. 2011 Jun;65(6):1532-56
pubmed: 21469191
Front Neurosci. 2013 Mar 12;7:31
pubmed: 23486659
J Neurosurg. 2017 Apr;126(4):1227-1237
pubmed: 27257834
Biophys J. 1994 Jan;66(1):259-67
pubmed: 8130344
Neuroimage. 2019 Oct 15;200:89-100
pubmed: 31228638
Brain Struct Funct. 2018 Jul;223(6):2841-2858
pubmed: 29663135
Nat Commun. 2017 Nov 7;8(1):1349
pubmed: 29116093
J Neurooncol. 2016 Feb;126(3):535-43
pubmed: 26566653
Neuroimage. 2012 Feb 1;59(3):2208-16
pubmed: 22005591
Neuroimage. 2017 May 15;152:450-466
pubmed: 28284799
J Neurosurg. 2017 May;126(5):1657-1668
pubmed: 27392264
Neuroimage Clin. 2017 Aug 12;16:276-285
pubmed: 28840099
Hum Brain Mapp. 2013 Nov;34(11):2747-66
pubmed: 22611035
Neuroimage. 2013 Nov 1;81:335-346
pubmed: 23684865
Neuroimage. 2012 Aug 15;62(2):782-90
pubmed: 21979382
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2006;9(Pt 2):58-66
pubmed: 17354756
Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc. 2019 Jun - Aug;112-113:1-16
pubmed: 31481155
Neuroimage. 2013 Feb 15;67:298-312
pubmed: 23238430
Magn Reson Med. 2009 Jun;61(6):1336-49
pubmed: 19319973
Neuroimage. 2012 Feb 15;59(4):3227-42
pubmed: 22094644
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2010 Jun;29(6):1310-20
pubmed: 20378467
Neuroimage. 2012 Feb 15;59(4):3976-94
pubmed: 22036682
Neuroimage. 2015 Aug 15;117:40-55
pubmed: 26004503
Neuroimage. 2011 Feb 1;54(3):2033-44
pubmed: 20851191
J Neurosurg. 2013 Jun;118(6):1367-77
pubmed: 23540269
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015 Oct;36(10):1853-8
pubmed: 26113071
Front Neuroinform. 2014 Mar 28;8:28
pubmed: 24734018
Neuroimage. 2007 May 1;35(4):1459-72
pubmed: 17379540
Magn Reson Med. 2016 Nov;76(5):1574-1581
pubmed: 26745823
Neuroimage. 2014 Dec;103:411-426
pubmed: 25109526
Neuroimage. 2019 Jan 15;185:1-11
pubmed: 30317017