Discrepancies between ePrescriptions and dispensing in Belgium, 6 years after the launch of the electronic prescribing - a mixed-method study.

Electronic prescribing community pharmacy services mixed methods study public health software evaluation

Journal

Acta clinica Belgica
ISSN: 2295-3337
Titre abrégé: Acta Clin Belg
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0370306

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Apr 2022
Historique:
pubmed: 16 2 2021
medline: 9 3 2022
entrez: 15 2 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The number of electronic prescriptions (ePrescriptions) grows steadily in Belgium as in other European countries. In the future, Belgium wants to dematerialize the ePrescription flow, removing all paper trails. A quality check of the digital content and implementation of national ePrescription guidelines in the field was conducted, comparing the content at both prescription and pharmacy side. An explanatory mixed-methods design was applied. In a first phase, potential problems (warning flags) were identified by consulting stakeholders. Secondly, the warning flags were validated to problems (errors) in a random set of ePrescriptions collected in April 2019. In a third phase, explanatory interviews were held with various stakeholders in order to find explanations and to identify the initiators of these errors. In the first phase, 15 warning flags were identified to evaluate the quality of an ePrescription. In the second phase, a random selection of 11,798 ePrescriptions was validated. The most prevalent errors found, were the digital construction of the messages (18.88%), combined with lots of necessarily deemed substitutions by the pharmacist (3.39%) not following what was prescribed originally. In the third phase, stakeholders indicated that software of the prescriber and the use of inconsistent databases between prescriber and pharmacy can often be seen as the cause and initiator of these problems. Use of authentic medication databases and well-designed software systems have the potential to solve ePrescription problems. Focus should go to prevention instead of detection.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33586629
doi: 10.1080/17843286.2021.1885884
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

377-386

Auteurs

S Van Laere (S)

Department of Public Health (GEWE), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.

E Tommelein (E)

Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences (FARM), Drug Analysis and Drug Information (FASC), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.

E Dreesen (E)

Tarification Service Koninklijk Limburgs Apothekers Verbond (KLAV), Hasselt, Belgium.

R Buyl (R)

Department of Public Health (GEWE), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.

P Cornu (P)

Centre for Pharmaceutical Research (Cephar), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH