Novel bone grafting technique in stand-alone ALIF procedure combining allograft and autograft ('Northumbria Technique')-Fusion rate and functional outcomes in 100 consecutive patients.
ALIF
Allograft
Autograft
ICBG
Interbody fusion
Journal
European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society
ISSN: 1432-0932
Titre abrégé: Eur Spine J
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9301980
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 2021
05 2021
Historique:
received:
25
08
2020
accepted:
27
01
2021
revised:
03
01
2021
pubmed:
17
2
2021
medline:
6
7
2021
entrez:
16
2
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Successful ALIF surgery depends upon achieving solid fusion, whilst avoiding significant complications. Herein, we present the 'Northumbria Technique' of combining allograft with autograft in order to achieve solid interbody fusion. A single-surgeon series of 100 consecutive patients undergoing stand-alone ALIF from 2016 to 2019 was studied. All had percutaneously harvested iliac crest bone graft (ICBG) dowels inserted into blocks of fresh frozen femoral head (FFFH) allograft, which were then inserted into the ALIF cages. Patients had dynamic radiographs at 4 months, CT at 6 months, and patient reported outcome measure scores (PROMS) throughout. One hundred patients (average age 44.8 years) were followed-up for an average of 29.1 months. Ninety-four (94%) patients were assessed as having fused on both CT and radiographs by an independent Radiologist. Three (3%) patients had abolition of movement on radiographs, but either lacked a CT scan or failed to meet Williams criteria for fusion. Two patients failed to attend for any imaging, so were considered not fused, and one patient had no evidence of fusion in either modality. There was a significant improvement in all PROMS. There were no intra-operative complications, and one patient had transient donor-site pain. The newly described 'Northumbria Technique' utilises the osteoconductive characteristics of the FFFH allograft, as well as the osteoinductive and osteogenic properties of the ICBG autograft. It gives high fusion rates (94-97%) and statistically significant improvements in PROMS, whilst avoiding the complications of harvesting a large amount of autograft and the huge costs of using synthetic agents.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33590282
doi: 10.1007/s00586-021-06758-8
pii: 10.1007/s00586-021-06758-8
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1296-1302Références
Christensen FB, Karlsmose B, Hansen ES, Bünger CE (1996) Radiological and functional outcome after anterior lumbar interbody spinal fusion. Eur Spine J. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00304343
doi: 10.1007/BF00304343
pubmed: 8915633
Kleeman TJ, Michael Ahn U, Talbot-Kleeman A (2001) Laparoscopic anterior lumbar interbody fusion with rhBMP-2: A prospective study of clinical and radiographic outcomes. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200112150-00026
doi: 10.1097/00007632-200112150-00026
Chatha G, Foo SWL, Lind CRP et al (2014) Anterior lumbar interbody surgery for spondylosis results from a classically-trained neurosurgeon. J Clin Neurosci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2013.11.033
doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2013.11.033
pubmed: 24786717
Kasis AG (2019) Stand-Alone Interbody Devices: Static Versus Dynamic. In: Handbook of Spine Technology
Simmons JW (1985) Posterior lumbar interbody fusion with posterior elements as chip grafts. Clin Orthop Relat Res. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-198503000-00011
doi: 10.1097/00003086-198503000-00011
pubmed: 3905103
Williams AL, Gornet MF, Burkus JK (2005) CT evaluation of lumbar interbody fusion: Current concepts. Am. J, Neuroradiol
Scott-Young M, McEntee L, Schram B et al (2017) The concurrent use of lumbar total disc arthroplasty and anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000002263
doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002263
Scott-Young MN, Zotti MGT (2019) Allograft Use in Modern Spinal Surgery. In: Handbook of Spine Technology
Rao PJ, Loganathan A, Yeung V, Mobbs RJ (2015) Outcomes of anterior lumbar interbody fusion surgery based on indication. Neurosurgery 76:7–24. https://doi.org/10.1227/NEU.0000000000000561
doi: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000000561
pubmed: 25255259
Pavlov PW, Meijers H, Van Limbeek J et al (2004) Good outcome and restoration of lordosis after anterior lumbar interbody fusion with additional posterior fixation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000137067.68630.70
doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000137067.68630.70
Riouallon G, Lachaniette CHF, Poignard A, Allain J (2013) Outcomes of anterior lumbar interbody fusion in low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis in adults: a continuous series of 65 cases with an average follow-up of 6.6years. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2012.12.009
doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2012.12.009
pubmed: 23602311
Arrington ED, Smith WJ, Chambers HG et al (1996) Complications of iliac crest bone graft harvesting. Clin Orthop Relat Res. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-199608000-00037
doi: 10.1097/00003086-199608000-00037
pubmed: 8769465
Banwart J, Asher M (1995) Iliac crest bone graft harvest donor site morbidity: a statistical evaluation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199505000-00012
doi: 10.1097/00007632-199505000-00012
Silber JS, Anderson DG, Daffner SD et al (2003) Donor site morbidity after anterior iliac crest bone harvest for single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200301150-00008
doi: 10.1097/00007632-200301150-00008
Schnee CL, Freese A, Weil RJ, Marcotte PJ (1997) Analysis of harvest morbidity and radiographic outcome using autograft for anterior cervical fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199710010-00005
doi: 10.1097/00007632-199710010-00005
Lubelski D, Abdullah KG, Steinmetz MP et al (2015) Adverse events with the use of rhBMP-2 in thoracolumbar and lumbar spine fusions: a 9-year institutional analysis. J Spinal Disord Tech. https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0b013e318287f2e2
doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e318287f2e2
pubmed: 23429306
Strube P, Hoff E, Hartwig T et al (2012) Stand-alone anterior versus anteroposterior lumbar interbody single-level fusion after a mean follow-up of 41 months. J Spinal Disord Tech. https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0b013e3182263d91
doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3182263d91
pubmed: 21716142
Hoff E, Strube P, Gross C et al (2010) Monosegmental anterior lumbar interbody fusion with the SynFix-LR device. A prospective 2-year follow-up study. Orthopade. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00132-010-1654-9
doi: 10.1007/s00132-010-1654-9
pubmed: 20821188
Tiusanen H, Seitsalo S, Österman K, Soini J (1996) Anterior interbody lumbar fusion in severe low back pain. Clin Orthop Relat Res. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-199603000-00018
doi: 10.1097/00003086-199603000-00018
pubmed: 8595751
Cho CB, Ryu KS, Park CK (2010) Anterior lumbar interbody fusion with stand-alone interbody cage in treatment of lumbar intervertebral foraminal stenosis: Comparative study of two different types of cages. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 47:352–357. https://doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2010.47.5.352
doi: 10.3340/jkns.2010.47.5.352
pubmed: 20539794
pmcid: 2883055
Newman MH, Grinstead GL (1992) Anterior lumbar interbody fusion for internal disc disruption. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 17:831–833. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199207000-00017
doi: 10.1097/00007632-199207000-00017
Shim JH, Park CK (2011) Erratum: Comparison of instrumented posterolateral fusion versus percutaneous pedicle screw fixation combined with anterior lumbar interbody fusion in elderly patients with L5–S1 isthmic spondylolisthesis and foraminal stenosis. J Neurosurg Spine. https://doi.org/10.3171/2011.5.spine10653a
doi: 10.3171/2011.5.spine10653a
pubmed: 21599444
Hacker RJ (1997) Comparison of interbody fusion approaches for disabling low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 22:660–666. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199703150-00017
doi: 10.1097/00007632-199703150-00017