School-based vision screening in Quetta, Pakistan: a qualitative study of experiences of teachers and eye care providers.
Children
Pakistan
Qualitative
School health
South Asia
Task shifting
Teachers
Vision screening
Visual impairment
Journal
BMC public health
ISSN: 1471-2458
Titre abrégé: BMC Public Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968562
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
16 02 2021
16 02 2021
Historique:
received:
26
05
2020
accepted:
07
02
2021
entrez:
17
2
2021
pubmed:
18
2
2021
medline:
21
5
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Visual impairment in children is a significant public health problem affecting millions of children globally. Many eye problems experienced by children can be easily diagnosed and treated. We conducted a qualitative study with teachers and optometrists involved in a school-based vision screening programme in Quetta district of Pakistan to explore their experiences of training, vision screening and referrals and to identify factors impacting on the effectiveness of the programme. Between April 2018 and June 2018, we conducted semi-structured in-depth interviews with 14 teachers from eight purposefully selected schools with high rates of inaccurate (false positive) referrals. Interviews were also conducted with three optometrists from a not-for profit private eye care hospital that had trained the teachers. Interviews were audio recorded and professionally transcribed. NVIVO software version 12 was used to code and thematically analyze the data. Findings suggest that the importance of school-based vision screening was well understood and appreciated by the teachers and optometrists. Most participants felt that there was a strong level of support for the vision screening programme within the participating schools. However, there were a number of operational issues undermining the quality of screening. Eight teachers felt that the duration of the training was insufficient; the training was rushed; six teachers said that the procedures were not sufficiently explained, and the teachers had no time to practice. The screening protocol was not always followed by the teachers. Additionally, many teachers reported being overburdened with other work, which affected both their levels of participation in the training and the time they spent on the screening. School-based vision screening by teachers is a cost-effective strategy to detect and treat children's vision impairment early on. In the programme reviewed here however, a significant number of teachers over referred children to ophthalmic services, overwhelming their capacity and undermining the efficiency of the approach. To maximise the effectiveness and efficiency of school-based screening, future initiatives should give sufficient attention to the duration of the teacher training, experience of trainers, support supervision, refresher trainings, regular use of the screening guidelines, and the workload and motivation of those trained.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Visual impairment in children is a significant public health problem affecting millions of children globally. Many eye problems experienced by children can be easily diagnosed and treated. We conducted a qualitative study with teachers and optometrists involved in a school-based vision screening programme in Quetta district of Pakistan to explore their experiences of training, vision screening and referrals and to identify factors impacting on the effectiveness of the programme.
METHODS
Between April 2018 and June 2018, we conducted semi-structured in-depth interviews with 14 teachers from eight purposefully selected schools with high rates of inaccurate (false positive) referrals. Interviews were also conducted with three optometrists from a not-for profit private eye care hospital that had trained the teachers. Interviews were audio recorded and professionally transcribed. NVIVO software version 12 was used to code and thematically analyze the data.
RESULTS
Findings suggest that the importance of school-based vision screening was well understood and appreciated by the teachers and optometrists. Most participants felt that there was a strong level of support for the vision screening programme within the participating schools. However, there were a number of operational issues undermining the quality of screening. Eight teachers felt that the duration of the training was insufficient; the training was rushed; six teachers said that the procedures were not sufficiently explained, and the teachers had no time to practice. The screening protocol was not always followed by the teachers. Additionally, many teachers reported being overburdened with other work, which affected both their levels of participation in the training and the time they spent on the screening.
CONCLUSIONS
School-based vision screening by teachers is a cost-effective strategy to detect and treat children's vision impairment early on. In the programme reviewed here however, a significant number of teachers over referred children to ophthalmic services, overwhelming their capacity and undermining the efficiency of the approach. To maximise the effectiveness and efficiency of school-based screening, future initiatives should give sufficient attention to the duration of the teacher training, experience of trainers, support supervision, refresher trainings, regular use of the screening guidelines, and the workload and motivation of those trained.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33593327
doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10404-9
pii: 10.1186/s12889-021-10404-9
pmc: PMC7885518
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
364Références
Lancet. 2018 Nov 17;392(10160):2214-2228
pubmed: 30314860
Implement Sci. 2013 Jun 10;8:63
pubmed: 23758952
Bull World Health Organ. 2016 Sep 1;94(9):652-659
pubmed: 27708470
PLoS One. 2019 Jun 12;14(6):e0212603
pubmed: 31188826
Bull World Health Organ. 2008 Jan;86(1):63-70
pubmed: 18235892
Surv Ophthalmol. 2019 Jul - Aug;64(4):512-557
pubmed: 30703405
PLoS Med. 2020 Feb 11;17(2):e1003021
pubmed: 32045409
Hum Resour Health. 2019 Nov 1;17(1):79
pubmed: 31675965
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 May 6;20(1):381
pubmed: 32375761
Health Psychol Rev. 2017 Mar;11(1):33-52
pubmed: 27677440
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2012 Sep-Oct;60(5):432-7
pubmed: 22944755
Lancet. 2020 Feb 22;395(10224):605-658
pubmed: 32085821
J Clin Diagn Res. 2016 Apr;10(4):NC09-14
pubmed: 27190849
BMJ Open. 2018 Apr 28;8(4):e021467
pubmed: 29705769
Hum Resour Health. 2019 Mar 6;17(1):18
pubmed: 30841900
Indian J Community Med. 2015 Jan-Mar;40(1):38-42
pubmed: 25657511
Syst Rev. 2018 Dec 6;7(1):227
pubmed: 30522529
Implement Sci. 2020 Jan 6;15(1):4
pubmed: 31906983
Bull World Health Organ. 2018 Oct 1;96(10):682-694D
pubmed: 30455516
PLoS One. 2014 Jun 13;9(6):e96684
pubmed: 24926993
Qual Life Res. 2016 Oct;25(10):2633-2643
pubmed: 27076189
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2014 May;132(5):640-4
pubmed: 24604415
Lancet Glob Health. 2019 Jun;7(6):e761-e771
pubmed: 31097278
Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2014 Aug;21(4):207-9
pubmed: 25014210
Hum Resour Health. 2009 Jan 14;7:2
pubmed: 19144187
BMC Public Health. 2013 Mar 21;13:256
pubmed: 23517517
Oman J Ophthalmol. 2019 May-Aug;12(2):88-93
pubmed: 31198293