Reversals in initially denied Department of Veterans Affairs' PTSD disability claims after 17 years: a cohort study of gender differences.
Cohort studies
Compensation
Gender
Posttraumatic stress disorder
Veterans disability claims
Journal
BMC women's health
ISSN: 1472-6874
Titre abrégé: BMC Womens Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088690
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
16 02 2021
16 02 2021
Historique:
received:
04
06
2020
accepted:
08
02
2021
entrez:
17
2
2021
pubmed:
18
2
2021
medline:
1
6
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
In 2011, the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) strengthened its disability claims processes for military sexual trauma, hoping to reduce gender differences in initial posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) disability awards. These process improvements should also have helped women reverse previously denied claims and, potentially, diminished gender discrepancies in appealed claims' outcomes. Our objectives were to examine gender differences in reversals of denied PTSD claims' outcomes after 2011, determine whether disability awards (also known as "service connection") for other disorders offset any PTSD gender discrepancy, and identify mediating confounders that could explain any persisting discrepancy. From a nationally representative cohort created in 1998, we examined service connection outcomes in 253 men and 663 women whose initial PTSD claims were denied. The primary outcome was PTSD service connection as of August 24, 2016. Secondary outcomes were service connection for any disorder and total disability rating. The total disability rating determines the generosity of Veterans' benefits. 51.4% of men and 31.3% of women were service connected for PTSD by study's end (p < 0.001). At inception, 54.2% of men and 63.2% of women had any service connection-i.e., service connection for disorders other than PTSD (p = 0.01) and similar total disability ratings (p = 0.50). However, by study's end, more men than women had any service connection (88.5% versus 83.5%, p = 0.05), and men's mean total disability rating was substantially greater than women's (77.1 ± 26.2 versus 66.8 ± 30.7, p < 0.001). History of military sexual assault had the largest effect modification on men's versus women's odds of PTSD service connection. Even after 2011, cohort men were more likely than the women to reverse initially denied PTSD claims, and military sexual assault history accounted for much of this difference. Service connection for other disorders initially offset women's lower rate of PTSD service connection, but, ultimately, men's total disability ratings exceeded women's. Gender discrepancies in service connection should be monitored beyond the initial claims period.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
In 2011, the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) strengthened its disability claims processes for military sexual trauma, hoping to reduce gender differences in initial posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) disability awards. These process improvements should also have helped women reverse previously denied claims and, potentially, diminished gender discrepancies in appealed claims' outcomes. Our objectives were to examine gender differences in reversals of denied PTSD claims' outcomes after 2011, determine whether disability awards (also known as "service connection") for other disorders offset any PTSD gender discrepancy, and identify mediating confounders that could explain any persisting discrepancy.
METHODS
From a nationally representative cohort created in 1998, we examined service connection outcomes in 253 men and 663 women whose initial PTSD claims were denied. The primary outcome was PTSD service connection as of August 24, 2016. Secondary outcomes were service connection for any disorder and total disability rating. The total disability rating determines the generosity of Veterans' benefits.
RESULTS
51.4% of men and 31.3% of women were service connected for PTSD by study's end (p < 0.001). At inception, 54.2% of men and 63.2% of women had any service connection-i.e., service connection for disorders other than PTSD (p = 0.01) and similar total disability ratings (p = 0.50). However, by study's end, more men than women had any service connection (88.5% versus 83.5%, p = 0.05), and men's mean total disability rating was substantially greater than women's (77.1 ± 26.2 versus 66.8 ± 30.7, p < 0.001). History of military sexual assault had the largest effect modification on men's versus women's odds of PTSD service connection.
CONCLUSION
Even after 2011, cohort men were more likely than the women to reverse initially denied PTSD claims, and military sexual assault history accounted for much of this difference. Service connection for other disorders initially offset women's lower rate of PTSD service connection, but, ultimately, men's total disability ratings exceeded women's. Gender discrepancies in service connection should be monitored beyond the initial claims period.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33593337
doi: 10.1186/s12905-021-01214-7
pii: 10.1186/s12905-021-01214-7
pmc: PMC7885341
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
70Subventions
Organisme : HSRD VA
ID : I01 HX000233
Pays : United States
Organisme : VA Health Services Research and Development Services
ID : CIN-13-406
Organisme : VA Health Services Research and Development
ID : IIR-09-359
Organisme : VA Health Service Research and Development Service
ID : HFP 98-001
Références
Violence Vict. 1998 Fall;13(3):203-16
pubmed: 9836410
Health Serv Res. 2018 Dec;53(6):4565-4583
pubmed: 29667171
J Trauma Stress. 2008 Feb;21(1):40-8
pubmed: 18302170
Int J Biostat. 2010;6(2):Article 6
pubmed: 21969993
Mil Med. 2005 Feb;170(2):137-40
pubmed: 15782835
J Biom Biostat. 2012 May 23;3(4):142
pubmed: 23420565
J Trauma Stress. 2017 Feb;30(1):36-44
pubmed: 28099769
Ann Intern Med. 2017 Aug 15;167(4):268-274
pubmed: 28693043
Psychiatr Serv. 2014 May 1;65(5):663-9
pubmed: 24535436
Mil Med. 2007 Jun;172(6):572-5
pubmed: 17615834
Med Care. 2003 Apr;41(4):536-49
pubmed: 12665717
Med Care. 2005 Feb;43(2):112-21
pubmed: 15655424
J Clin Psychol. 1991 Jan;47(1):80-6
pubmed: 2026782
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2011 Oct;68(10):1072-80
pubmed: 21969464
Med Care. 2003 Aug;41(8):950-61
pubmed: 12886174