Is a picture-perfect thrombectomy necessary in acute ischemic stroke?
stroke
thrombectomy
Journal
Journal of neurointerventional surgery
ISSN: 1759-8486
Titre abrégé: J Neurointerv Surg
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101517079
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Feb 2022
Feb 2022
Historique:
received:
10
12
2020
revised:
11
01
2021
accepted:
15
01
2021
pubmed:
18
2
2021
medline:
21
1
2022
entrez:
17
2
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The benefit of complete reperfusion (modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) 3) over near-complete reperfusion (≥90%, mTICI 2c) remains unclear. The goal of this study is to compare clinical outcomes between mechanical thrombectomy (MT)-treated stroke patients with mTICI 2c versus 3. This is a retrospective study from the Stroke Thrombectomy and Aneurysm Registry (STAR) comprising 33 centers. Adults with anterior circulation arterial vessel occlusion who underwent MT yielding mTICI 2c or mTICI 3 reperfusion were included. Patients were categorized based on reperfusion grade achieved. Primary outcome was modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0-2 at 90 days. Secondary outcomes were mRS scores at discharge and 90 days, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score at discharge, procedure-related complications, and symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage. The unmatched mTICI 2c and mTICI 3 cohorts comprised 519 and 1923 patients, respectively. There was no difference in primary (42.4% vs 45.1%; p=0.264) or secondary outcomes between the unmatched cohorts. Reperfusion status (mTICI 2c vs 3) was also not predictive of the primary outcome in non-imputed and imputed multivariable models. The matched cohorts each comprised 191 patients. Primary (39.8% vs 47.6%; p=0.122) and secondary outcomes were also similar between the matched cohorts, except the 90-day mRS which was lower in the matched mTICI 3 cohort (p=0.049). There were increased odds of the primary outcome with mTICI 3 in patients with baseline mRS ≥2 (36% vs 7.7%; p=0.011; p Complete and near-complete reperfusion after MT appear to confer comparable outcomes in patients with acute stroke.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The benefit of complete reperfusion (modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) 3) over near-complete reperfusion (≥90%, mTICI 2c) remains unclear. The goal of this study is to compare clinical outcomes between mechanical thrombectomy (MT)-treated stroke patients with mTICI 2c versus 3.
METHODS
METHODS
This is a retrospective study from the Stroke Thrombectomy and Aneurysm Registry (STAR) comprising 33 centers. Adults with anterior circulation arterial vessel occlusion who underwent MT yielding mTICI 2c or mTICI 3 reperfusion were included. Patients were categorized based on reperfusion grade achieved. Primary outcome was modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0-2 at 90 days. Secondary outcomes were mRS scores at discharge and 90 days, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score at discharge, procedure-related complications, and symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The unmatched mTICI 2c and mTICI 3 cohorts comprised 519 and 1923 patients, respectively. There was no difference in primary (42.4% vs 45.1%; p=0.264) or secondary outcomes between the unmatched cohorts. Reperfusion status (mTICI 2c vs 3) was also not predictive of the primary outcome in non-imputed and imputed multivariable models. The matched cohorts each comprised 191 patients. Primary (39.8% vs 47.6%; p=0.122) and secondary outcomes were also similar between the matched cohorts, except the 90-day mRS which was lower in the matched mTICI 3 cohort (p=0.049). There were increased odds of the primary outcome with mTICI 3 in patients with baseline mRS ≥2 (36% vs 7.7%; p=0.011; p
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Complete and near-complete reperfusion after MT appear to confer comparable outcomes in patients with acute stroke.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33593800
pii: neurintsurg-2020-017193
doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2020-017193
pmc: PMC10947782
mid: NIHMS1971033
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
111-116Subventions
Organisme : American Heart Association-American Stroke Association
ID : 18CDA34110295
Pays : United States
Investigateurs
Dileep R Yavagal
(DR)
Eric C Peterson
(EC)
Daniel Raper
(D)
Patrick A Brown
(PA)
M Reid Gooch
(M)
Nabeel Herial
(N)
Ajith Thomas
(A)
Justin Moore
(J)
Felipe Albuquerque
(F)
Louis J Kim
(LJ)
Melanie Walker
(M)
Michael Chen
(M)
Stephan Munich
(S)
Daniel Alan Hoit
(DA)
Violiza Inoa-Acosta
(V)
Christopher Nickele Lucas
(CN)
Elijovich Fernanda
(E)
Jan Liman Rodriguez-Erazú
(JL)
Michael Cawley
(M)
Gustavo Pradilla
(G)
Brian Howard
(B)
Brian Walcott
(B)
Zeguang Ren
(Z)
Ryan Hebert
(R)
João Reis
(J)
Jaime Pamplona
(J)
Rui Carvalho
(R)
Mariana Baptista
(M)
Ana Nunes
(A)
Russell Cerejo
(R)
Ashis Tayal
(A)
Parita Bhuva
(P)
Paul Hansen
(P)
Norman Ajiboye
(N)
Alex Brehm
(A)
Sami Al Kasab
(SA)
Jonathan Lena
(J)
Kimberly Kicielinski
(K)
Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: MRL: Grants from the NIH (R01NS105692, R01NS088072, U24NS100654, UL1TR002319, R25NS079200) and the American Heart Association (18CDA34110295). Unrestricted educational grants from Medtronic, Stryker and Philips Volcano. Consultant for Medtronic. Minor equity/ownership interest in Proprio, Cerebrotech, Synchron. Adviser to Metis Innovative. JAG: Grants from the Georgia Research Alliance. Consultant for Cognition Medical. AJY: Grants from Medtronic, Cerenovus, Penumbra, and Stryker. Consultant for Penumbra and Cerenovus. Equity interest in Insera Therapeutics. RWC: Proctor for Medtronic and Cerenovus. AMS: Research support from Penumbra, Stryker, Medtronic, and Siemens. Consultant for Penumbra, Stryker, Terumo, and Arsenal. MM: Consultant for Medtronic and Cerenovus. Stock ownership in Serenity Medical, Synchron, and Endostream. RMS: Grants from the NREF, Joe Niekro Foundation, Brain Aneurysm Foundation, Bee Foundation, the NIH (R01NS111119-01A1, UL1TR002736, KL2TR002737), the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities, and Medtronic. Consultant for Penumbra, Abbott, Medtronic, InNeuroCo and Cerenovus. Others: None.
Références
Stroke. 2018 Oct;49(10):2376-2382
pubmed: 30355107
Lancet. 2012 Oct 6;380(9849):1231-40
pubmed: 22932714
Stroke. 2018 May;49(5):1189-1196
pubmed: 29626134
Stroke. 2005 Feb;36(2):292-6
pubmed: 15625300
Stroke. 2017 Sep;48(9):2488-2493
pubmed: 28775136
Neurology. 2015 Dec 1;85(22):1980-90
pubmed: 26537058
Stroke. 2007 Mar;38(3):967-73
pubmed: 17272772
Interv Neurol. 2018 Apr;7(3-4):137-147
pubmed: 29719551
World Neurosurg. 2018 Nov;119:e928-e933
pubmed: 30103055
Lancet. 2016 Apr 23;387(10029):1723-31
pubmed: 26898852
Stroke. 2019 Dec;50(12):e344-e418
pubmed: 31662037
Stroke. 2020 Jun;51(6):1790-1796
pubmed: 32397926
J Neurointerv Surg. 2014 Mar;6(2):83-6
pubmed: 23390038
Eur Radiol. 2018 Jan;28(1):274-282
pubmed: 28752216
J Neurointerv Surg. 2019 May;11(5):433-438
pubmed: 30194109
Lancet. 2012 Oct 6;380(9849):1241-9
pubmed: 22932715
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 10;14(1):e0210334
pubmed: 30629664