Contemporary Management of Traumatic Duodenal Injuries.


Journal

The American surgeon
ISSN: 1555-9823
Titre abrégé: Am Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0370522

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Apr 2023
Historique:
medline: 5 6 2023
pubmed: 18 2 2021
entrez: 17 2 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Traumatic duodenal injury is a rare, potentially devastating condition with challenging management decisions. Contemporary literature on operative management of duodenal injury is lacking. The purpose of this study is to assess optimal management strategies based on outcomes of patients with traumatic duodenal injury at a single trauma center. A retrospective study of patients with traumatic duodenal injury from 2013-2020 at a level 1 trauma center was performed. Patient demographics, grade of injury as noted on CT scan or intraoperatively, surgical procedure(s) performed, and resultant outcomes were extracted. After excluding one patient due to death on arrival, 23 patients met inclusion criteria. Injuries consisted of grade 1 (n = 7), grade 2 (n = 2), grade 3 (n = 12), and grade 5 (n = 2); there were no grade 4 injuries. Patients were predominantly male (83%) with a median age of 30 years old. Nineteen patients (82%) underwent surgery. Four of nine patients (44%) with grade 1/2 injuries had hematomas and were managed non-operatively. The remaining five patients (56%) with grade 1/2 injuries underwent operation, which included primary repair (n = 3), duodenal exclusion (n = 1), and periduodenal drainage (n = 1). Of 12 patients with grade 3 injury, 6 underwent primary repair and 6 underwent resection. Three patients who underwent primary repair and one who underwent resection developed a duodenal leak. All patients with grade 5 injury (n = 2) underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy. Grade 1 and 2 duodenal hematomas can be managed non-operatively, while lacerations require operative repair. Outcomes may be better following resection in patients with grade 3 injury.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Traumatic duodenal injury is a rare, potentially devastating condition with challenging management decisions. Contemporary literature on operative management of duodenal injury is lacking. The purpose of this study is to assess optimal management strategies based on outcomes of patients with traumatic duodenal injury at a single trauma center.
METHODS METHODS
A retrospective study of patients with traumatic duodenal injury from 2013-2020 at a level 1 trauma center was performed. Patient demographics, grade of injury as noted on CT scan or intraoperatively, surgical procedure(s) performed, and resultant outcomes were extracted.
RESULTS RESULTS
After excluding one patient due to death on arrival, 23 patients met inclusion criteria. Injuries consisted of grade 1 (n = 7), grade 2 (n = 2), grade 3 (n = 12), and grade 5 (n = 2); there were no grade 4 injuries. Patients were predominantly male (83%) with a median age of 30 years old. Nineteen patients (82%) underwent surgery. Four of nine patients (44%) with grade 1/2 injuries had hematomas and were managed non-operatively. The remaining five patients (56%) with grade 1/2 injuries underwent operation, which included primary repair (n = 3), duodenal exclusion (n = 1), and periduodenal drainage (n = 1). Of 12 patients with grade 3 injury, 6 underwent primary repair and 6 underwent resection. Three patients who underwent primary repair and one who underwent resection developed a duodenal leak. All patients with grade 5 injury (n = 2) underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Grade 1 and 2 duodenal hematomas can be managed non-operatively, while lacerations require operative repair. Outcomes may be better following resection in patients with grade 3 injury.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33596103
doi: 10.1177/0003134821995054
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1254-1257

Auteurs

Vincent Butano (V)

Center for Trauma and Critical Care, Department of Surgery, George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA.

Michael A Napolitano (MA)

Center for Trauma and Critical Care, Department of Surgery, George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA.

Vivien Pat (V)

Center for Trauma and Critical Care, Department of Surgery, George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA.

Taylor Wahrenbrock (T)

Center for Trauma and Critical Care, Department of Surgery, George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA.

Paul Lin (P)

Center for Trauma and Critical Care, Department of Surgery, George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA.

Megan T Quintana (MT)

Center for Trauma and Critical Care, Department of Surgery, George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA.

Susan Kartiko (S)

Center for Trauma and Critical Care, Department of Surgery, George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA.

Babak Sarani (B)

Center for Trauma and Critical Care, Department of Surgery, George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA.

Jordan M Estroff (JM)

Center for Trauma and Critical Care, Department of Surgery, George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH