Comparative effectiveness of lactulose and sennosides for the prevention of peritoneal dialysis-related peritonitis: an open-label, randomized, active-controlled trial.
Adult
Aged
Comparative Effectiveness Research
Female
Gastrointestinal Agents
/ administration & dosage
Humans
Lactulose
/ administration & dosage
Male
Middle Aged
Peritoneal Dialysis
/ adverse effects
Peritonitis
/ etiology
Proportional Hazards Models
Sennosides
/ administration & dosage
Thailand
Treatment Outcome
Senna
Constipation
lactulose
peritoneal dialysis
peritonitis
prevention
Journal
Annals of medicine
ISSN: 1365-2060
Titre abrégé: Ann Med
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8906388
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 2021
12 2021
Historique:
entrez:
18
2
2021
pubmed:
19
2
2021
medline:
22
9
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To the best of our knowledge, the effectiveness and safety of lactulose in comparison to sennosides, for the prevention of peritoneal dialysis (PD)-related peritonitis, has never been tested in a randomized study. We conducted an open-label, randomized, active-controlled trial in a PD-center in Northern Thailand. Adult patients on PD were enrolled and randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio into two groups; one group received lactulose 15 mL once daily ( One hundred PD patients were recruited (50.0% men; mean age 55.5 ± 13.0 years) in this study. The baseline characteristics of the study participants were similar in both groups. No significant trend towards a higher risk of PD-related peritonitis was observed in the lactulose group (HR, 2.32 [95% CI, 0.92-5.83]; Treatment with lactulose is not more effective than sennosides and cannot be routinely recommended for the prevention of peritonitis among the PD population. TRIAL REGISTRATION Thai Clinical Trial Registry (clinicaltrials.in.th); ID: TCTR20171012001 KEY MESSAGE To the best of our knowledge, no randomized controlled trial that compares the efficacy and safety profiles of lactulose versus sennosides for the prevention of PD-related peritonitis among the PD population has been conducted. In this open-label, randomized, active-controlled trial, treatment with lactulose is not more effective than sennosides in the prevention of PD-related peritonitis, and it could increase the risk of bacterial PD-related peritonitis. Further studies with a larger sample size by incorporated real-world evidence are needed to confirm our findings and to explore strategies to prevent peritonitis among PD patients.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
To the best of our knowledge, the effectiveness and safety of lactulose in comparison to sennosides, for the prevention of peritoneal dialysis (PD)-related peritonitis, has never been tested in a randomized study.
METHODS
We conducted an open-label, randomized, active-controlled trial in a PD-center in Northern Thailand. Adult patients on PD were enrolled and randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio into two groups; one group received lactulose 15 mL once daily (
RESULTS
One hundred PD patients were recruited (50.0% men; mean age 55.5 ± 13.0 years) in this study. The baseline characteristics of the study participants were similar in both groups. No significant trend towards a higher risk of PD-related peritonitis was observed in the lactulose group (HR, 2.32 [95% CI, 0.92-5.83];
CONCLUSIONS
Treatment with lactulose is not more effective than sennosides and cannot be routinely recommended for the prevention of peritonitis among the PD population. TRIAL REGISTRATION Thai Clinical Trial Registry (clinicaltrials.in.th); ID: TCTR20171012001 KEY MESSAGE To the best of our knowledge, no randomized controlled trial that compares the efficacy and safety profiles of lactulose versus sennosides for the prevention of PD-related peritonitis among the PD population has been conducted. In this open-label, randomized, active-controlled trial, treatment with lactulose is not more effective than sennosides in the prevention of PD-related peritonitis, and it could increase the risk of bacterial PD-related peritonitis. Further studies with a larger sample size by incorporated real-world evidence are needed to confirm our findings and to explore strategies to prevent peritonitis among PD patients.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33596746
doi: 10.1080/07853890.2021.1889023
pmc: PMC7894424
doi:
Substances chimiques
Gastrointestinal Agents
0
Sennosides
0
Lactulose
4618-18-2
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
365-374Références
Gut. 1974 Dec;15(12):999-1004
pubmed: 4448417
J Nephrol. 2020 Dec;33(6):1275-1287
pubmed: 32130719
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2009 May;24(5):1603-8
pubmed: 19103738
J Nutr. 1988 Jul;118(7):840-5
pubmed: 2839648
World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther. 2016 May 6;7(2):334-42
pubmed: 27158549
Gastroenterology. 2006 Apr;130(5):1480-91
pubmed: 16678561
Perit Dial Int. 2015 Nov;35(6):650-4
pubmed: 26702007
Tech Coloproctol. 2001 Dec;5(3):163-4
pubmed: 11875684
J Bras Nefrol. 2012 Oct-Dec;34(4):349-54
pubmed: 23318823
Perit Dial Int. 1996 Jul-Aug;16(4):423-5
pubmed: 8863339
Sci Rep. 2018 Oct 4;8(1):14797
pubmed: 30287920
Semin Dial. 2017 Mar;30(2):158-163
pubmed: 28066919
Eur J Surg. 1997 Jun;163(6):463-7
pubmed: 9231859
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1992 Jan-Feb;16(1):43-8
pubmed: 1738218
Clin Nephrol. 2012 Apr;77(4):267-74
pubmed: 22445469
Gut. 2003 Nov;52(11):1572-8
pubmed: 14570725
Am J Kidney Dis. 2020 Jul;76(1):42-53
pubmed: 31932094
BMJ. 2010 Mar 23;340:c332
pubmed: 20332509
Kidney Int. 2006 Apr;69(7):1245-52
pubmed: 16467787
Nephrology (Carlton). 2018 Aug;23(8):718-727
pubmed: 29468835
Perit Dial Int. 2016 9-10;36(5):481-508
pubmed: 27282851
Perit Dial Int. 2010 Mar-Apr;30(2):243-6
pubmed: 20200371
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016 Nov;27(11):3238-3252
pubmed: 27339663
Int J Nephrol Renovasc Dis. 2018 Jun 11;11:173-186
pubmed: 29928142
J Am Board Fam Med. 2011 Jul-Aug;24(4):436-51
pubmed: 21737769
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2008 May;46(5):507-13
pubmed: 18493204
N Engl J Med. 1950 May 11;242(19):747-51
pubmed: 15412704
Am J Kidney Dis. 2014 Aug;64(2):278-89
pubmed: 24751170
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2009 Apr;24(4):1289-92
pubmed: 18997162