Efficacy and safety of intravitreal aflibercept in ranibizumab-refractory patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration.
Angiogenesis Inhibitors
/ therapeutic use
France
Humans
Intravitreal Injections
Macular Degeneration
/ drug therapy
Prospective Studies
Ranibizumab
/ therapeutic use
Receptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor
/ therapeutic use
Recombinant Fusion Proteins
/ therapeutic use
Retrospective Studies
Treatment Outcome
Visual Acuity
Age-related macular degeneration
Exudative
Observational
Retina
Switch
Journal
BMC ophthalmology
ISSN: 1471-2415
Titre abrégé: BMC Ophthalmol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100967802
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
17 Feb 2021
17 Feb 2021
Historique:
received:
07
10
2020
accepted:
02
02
2021
entrez:
18
2
2021
pubmed:
19
2
2021
medline:
15
5
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents have become the standard of care in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). Despite generally excellent response rates to anti-VEGF therapy, some patients do not respond or may respond suboptimally. In the case of refractory or rapidly recurring fluid in nAMD, clinicians may switch to another anti-VEGF agent. TITAN was an observational study that assessed the effectiveness and safety of intravitreal aflibercept (IVT-AFL) in patients with nAMD refractory to ranibizumab who switched to IVT-AFL after less than 12 months of ranibizumab treatment in routine clinical practice in France. TITAN was an observational, retrospective and prospective 12-month study conducted at 28 centres in France. Patients with nAMD refractory to ranibizumab were enrolled. Patients who were switched from ranibizumab to IVT-AFL were followed for 12 months. Data were obtained from medical records for retrospectively included patients, and at routine follow-up visits for those included prospectively. The main outcome measure was percentage of patients who achieved treatment success (gain of ≥1 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters in best-corrected visual acuity [BCVA] and/or any reduction in central retinal thickness [CRT]) from baseline to 12 months after switching. A sample size of 225 patients was determined based on a 2-sided 95% confidence interval with a width equal to 0.12 when the sample proportion was 0.70. We analysed safety data (N = 217) and clinical outcomes from patients in the per-protocol population (n = 125). The mean (standard deviation) number of IVT-AFL injections was 7.5 (2.6). Treatment success was achieved in 68.8% of patients. Mean BCVA change from baseline to Month 12 was + 1.5 letters (P = 0.105) and the mean CRT change was - 45.0 μm (P < 0.001). In a subgroup analysis, in patients who received three initial monthly IVT-AFL injections, mean BCVA gain was 3.3 letters at Month 12 (P = 0.015). Excluding lack of efficacy and inappropriate scheduling of drug administration, the most common adverse event was eye pain (2.3%). Switching ranibizumab-refractory patients with nAMD to IVT-AFL may improve visual outcomes in some patients, particularly those who receive three initial monthly injections. ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT02321241 . First posted: December 22, 2014; Last update posted: July 2, 2018.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents have become the standard of care in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). Despite generally excellent response rates to anti-VEGF therapy, some patients do not respond or may respond suboptimally. In the case of refractory or rapidly recurring fluid in nAMD, clinicians may switch to another anti-VEGF agent. TITAN was an observational study that assessed the effectiveness and safety of intravitreal aflibercept (IVT-AFL) in patients with nAMD refractory to ranibizumab who switched to IVT-AFL after less than 12 months of ranibizumab treatment in routine clinical practice in France.
METHODS
METHODS
TITAN was an observational, retrospective and prospective 12-month study conducted at 28 centres in France. Patients with nAMD refractory to ranibizumab were enrolled. Patients who were switched from ranibizumab to IVT-AFL were followed for 12 months. Data were obtained from medical records for retrospectively included patients, and at routine follow-up visits for those included prospectively. The main outcome measure was percentage of patients who achieved treatment success (gain of ≥1 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters in best-corrected visual acuity [BCVA] and/or any reduction in central retinal thickness [CRT]) from baseline to 12 months after switching. A sample size of 225 patients was determined based on a 2-sided 95% confidence interval with a width equal to 0.12 when the sample proportion was 0.70.
RESULTS
RESULTS
We analysed safety data (N = 217) and clinical outcomes from patients in the per-protocol population (n = 125). The mean (standard deviation) number of IVT-AFL injections was 7.5 (2.6). Treatment success was achieved in 68.8% of patients. Mean BCVA change from baseline to Month 12 was + 1.5 letters (P = 0.105) and the mean CRT change was - 45.0 μm (P < 0.001). In a subgroup analysis, in patients who received three initial monthly IVT-AFL injections, mean BCVA gain was 3.3 letters at Month 12 (P = 0.015). Excluding lack of efficacy and inappropriate scheduling of drug administration, the most common adverse event was eye pain (2.3%).
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Switching ranibizumab-refractory patients with nAMD to IVT-AFL may improve visual outcomes in some patients, particularly those who receive three initial monthly injections.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
BACKGROUND
ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT02321241 . First posted: December 22, 2014; Last update posted: July 2, 2018.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33596867
doi: 10.1186/s12886-021-01841-6
pii: 10.1186/s12886-021-01841-6
pmc: PMC7890834
doi:
Substances chimiques
Angiogenesis Inhibitors
0
Recombinant Fusion Proteins
0
aflibercept
15C2VL427D
Receptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor
EC 2.7.10.1
Ranibizumab
ZL1R02VT79
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02321241']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Observational Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
90Références
Ophthalmology. 2014 Jan;121(1):188-192
pubmed: 24144450
Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:273754
pubmed: 24895562
Ophthalmology. 2014 Jan;121(1):193-201
pubmed: 24084500
Br J Ophthalmol. 2012 Jan;96(1):21-3
pubmed: 21733918
Retina. 2018 Dec;38(12):2285-2292
pubmed: 29190241
Ophthalmology. 2009 Jan;116(1):57-65.e5
pubmed: 19118696
Br J Ophthalmol. 2012 Jan;96(1):14-20
pubmed: 21791509
Drugs Today (Barc). 2012 May;48(5):317-29
pubmed: 22645720
Br J Ophthalmol. 2012 Jan;96(1):1-2
pubmed: 22157632
Clin Ophthalmol. 2012;6:1175-86
pubmed: 22973088
Ophthalmology. 2011 May;118(5):831-9
pubmed: 21146229
Retina. 2013 Sep;33(8):1605-12
pubmed: 23549101
Eur J Ophthalmol. 2016 Aug 4;26(5):473-8
pubmed: 26868007
Am J Ophthalmol. 2008 Feb;145(2):239-248
pubmed: 18222192
N Engl J Med. 2006 Oct 5;355(14):1419-31
pubmed: 17021318
Ophthalmology. 2009 Sep;116(9):1731-9
pubmed: 19643495
Am J Ophthalmol. 2013 Jul;156(1):29-35.e2
pubmed: 23668679
Angiogenesis. 2012 Jun;15(2):171-85
pubmed: 22302382
Br J Ophthalmol. 2014 Sep;98(9):1205-7
pubmed: 24795334
Ophthalmology. 2013 May;120(5):1046-56
pubmed: 23352196
Ophthalmology. 2008 Dec;115(12):2199-205
pubmed: 18930553
Ophthalmology. 2012 Dec;119(12):2537-48
pubmed: 23084240
Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2012 Mar;13(4):585-91
pubmed: 22300011
Adv Ther. 2019 Jul;36(7):1532-1548
pubmed: 31102206