Embryonic fate after somatic cell nuclear transfer in non-enucleated goldfish oocytes is determined by first cleavages and DNA methylation patterns.


Journal

Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
17 02 2021
Historique:
received: 30 11 2020
accepted: 25 01 2021
entrez: 18 2 2021
pubmed: 19 2 2021
medline: 15 12 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Reducing the variability in nuclear transfer outcome requires a better understanding of its cellular and epigenetic determinants, in order to ensure safer fish regeneration from cryobanked somatic material. In this work, clones from goldfish were obtained using cryopreserved fin cells as donor and non-enucleated oocytes as recipients. We showed that the high variability of clones survival was not correlated to spawn quality. Clones were then characterized for their first cleavages pattern in relation to their developmental fate up to hatching. The first cell cycle duration was increased in clones with abnormal first cleavage, and symmetric first two cleavages increased clone probability to reach later on 24 h- and hatching-stages. At 24 h-stage, 24% of the clones were diploids and from donor genetic origin only. However, ploidy and genetic origin did not determine clones morphological quality. DNA methylation reprogramming in the promoter region of pou2, nanog, and notail marker genes was highly variable, but clones with the nicest morphologies displayed the best DNA methylation reprogramming. To conclude, non-enucleated oocytes did allow authentic clones production. The first two cell cycles were a critical determinant of the clone ability to reach hatching-stage, and DNA methylation reprogramming significantly influenced clones morphological quality.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33597571
doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-83033-2
pii: 10.1038/s41598-021-83033-2
pmc: PMC7889938
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

3945

Références

Dev Growth Differ. 2003 Apr;45(2):167-74
pubmed: 12752504
Cell Cycle. 2010 Jun 15;9(12):2261-2
pubmed: 20519946
BMC Dev Biol. 2010 Jun 08;10:64
pubmed: 20529309
Int J Dev Biol. 2010;54(11-12):1679-83
pubmed: 21404188
Mol Cell. 2017 Mar 2;65(5):873-884.e8
pubmed: 28257702
Theriogenology. 2011 Jun;75(9):1755-61
pubmed: 21356550
Gene. 2012 Jan 15;492(1):130-7
pubmed: 22037485
Genesis. 2003 Dec;37(4):195-202
pubmed: 14666513
Cell Stem Cell. 2014 Oct 2;15(4):459-471
pubmed: 25280220
Sci Rep. 2018 Apr 16;8(1):5997
pubmed: 29662093
Zebrafish. 2010 Jun;7(2):215-8
pubmed: 20441523
Aquaculture. 2017 Apr 1;472:156-177
pubmed: 29276317
Nat Biotechnol. 2002 Aug;20(8):795-9
pubmed: 12134167
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Jan 30;98(3):1071-6
pubmed: 11158596
BMC Genomics. 2007 Feb 21;8:55
pubmed: 17313677
Gene Expr Patterns. 2003 Mar;3(1):43-7
pubmed: 12609601
Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol. 2009 Mar;152(3):205-15
pubmed: 19068235
Biol Reprod. 2009 Apr;80(4):674-84
pubmed: 19092113
Cryobiology. 2008 Jun;56(3):181-8
pubmed: 18346725
Nat Methods. 2009 Oct;6(10):733-5
pubmed: 19718031
PLoS One. 2017 Nov 16;12(11):e0188084
pubmed: 29145436
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 05;10(3):e0119285
pubmed: 25741707
Dev Growth Differ. 2007 Dec;49(9):699-709
pubmed: 17868280
Sci Rep. 2019 Feb 27;9(1):2861
pubmed: 30814557
Dev Growth Differ. 2008 Aug;50(6):427-36
pubmed: 18638166
Int J Dev Biol. 2019;63(6-7):287-293
pubmed: 31250912
Zoolog Sci. 2004 Jul;21(7):747-55
pubmed: 15277718
Cell Stem Cell. 2018 Oct 4;23(4):471-485
pubmed: 30033121
Cloning Stem Cells. 2008 Dec;10(4):443-52
pubmed: 19049414
Dev Growth Differ. 2007 Dec;49(9):691-8
pubmed: 17868281
Dev Growth Differ. 1999 Apr;41(2):163-72
pubmed: 10223712
Zygote. 1997 Nov;5(4):329-50
pubmed: 9563681
J Exp Zool. 2002 Dec 1;293(7):719-25
pubmed: 12410600
Int J Biol Sci. 2011 Apr 16;7(4):476-86
pubmed: 21547065
Int J Dev Biol. 2000 Dec;44(8):837-41
pubmed: 11206324
Mol Cell. 2014 Aug 21;55(4):524-36
pubmed: 25066233
Development. 1994 Apr;120(4):1009-15
pubmed: 7600949
Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol. 2013 Feb;164(2):69-79
pubmed: 23142214
Zygote. 2012 Feb;20(1):79-85
pubmed: 21106134
Int J Biol Sci. 2018 Jan 11;14(1):78-86
pubmed: 29483827
Biochem Genet. 2010 Aug;48(7-8):624-35
pubmed: 20503069
Int J Biol Sci. 2011 Apr 15;7(4):460-8
pubmed: 21547063
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2008 Jul;9(7):505-16
pubmed: 18568039
Mol Reprod Dev. 2005 Nov;72(3):377-85
pubmed: 16075464
Sci Rep. 2019 Aug 28;9(1):12462
pubmed: 31462687
Development. 1993 Oct;119(2):447-56
pubmed: 8287796
Nature. 1979 Aug 16;280(5723):585-7
pubmed: 572485
Sci Rep. 2019 Jul 18;9(1):10453
pubmed: 31320687
Cell Stem Cell. 2017 Jul 6;21(1):135-143.e6
pubmed: 28366589
Mol Reprod Dev. 2004 Feb;67(2):127-35
pubmed: 14694427
Cloning Stem Cells. 2005;7(4):255-64
pubmed: 16390261

Auteurs

Alexandra Depincé (A)

INRAE, UR1037 LPGP, Fish Physiology Ad Genomics, Campus de Beaulieu, 35000, Rennes, France.

Pierre-Yves Le Bail (PY)

INRAE, UR1037 LPGP, Fish Physiology Ad Genomics, Campus de Beaulieu, 35000, Rennes, France. pierre-yves.le-bail@inrae.fr.

Charlène Rouillon (C)

INRAE, UR1037 LPGP, Fish Physiology Ad Genomics, Campus de Beaulieu, 35000, Rennes, France.

Catherine Labbé (C)

INRAE, UR1037 LPGP, Fish Physiology Ad Genomics, Campus de Beaulieu, 35000, Rennes, France. catherine.labbe@inrae.fr.

Articles similaires

Robotic Surgical Procedures Animals Humans Telemedicine Models, Animal

Odour generalisation and detection dog training.

Lyn Caldicott, Thomas W Pike, Helen E Zulch et al.
1.00
Animals Odorants Dogs Generalization, Psychological Smell
Animals TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases Colorectal Neoplasms Colitis Mice
Animals Tail Swine Behavior, Animal Animal Husbandry

Classifications MeSH