Guidance for Demonstrating the Societal Value of new Antibiotics.
antibiotic
economic evaluation
resistance
transmission
value
Journal
Frontiers in pharmacology
ISSN: 1663-9812
Titre abrégé: Front Pharmacol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101548923
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
16
10
2020
accepted:
11
12
2020
entrez:
18
2
2021
pubmed:
19
2
2021
medline:
19
2
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Given that antibiotic use is associated with externalities, standard economic evaluation which considers costs and health gains accruing to patients under-values antibiotics. Informed by a scoping review, this discussion paper aims to identify the societal value elements of antibiotics and to provide guidance on how these value elements can be incorporated in economic evaluation. With a view to appropriately quantify the societal value of antibiotics, there is a need for good practice guidelines on the methodology of economic evaluation for such products. We argue that it is important to assess antibiotics at population level to account for their transmission, diversity, insurance, spectrum, novel action and enablement values. In addition to the value of antibiotics to infected patients, economic evaluations need to use modeling approaches to explore the impact of different modes of employing new and existing antibiotics (for example, as last resort treatment) on disease transmission and resistance development in current and future patients. Hence, assessing the value of antibiotics also involves an ethical dimension. Further work is required about how the multiple value elements of antibiotics are linked to each other and how they can be aggregated.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33597882
doi: 10.3389/fphar.2020.618238
pii: 618238
pmc: PMC7882732
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Pagination
618238Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 Simoens and Spriet.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
SS has carried out health economic studies of antibiotics funded by Sanofi-Aventis, Bayer, TEVA, and the Belgian National Institute for Health and Disability Insurance. IS received unrestricted research grants from Pfizer and Merck, and travel support from Pfizer, Merck and Gilead.
Références
Value Health. 2018 Oct;21(10):1133-1149
pubmed: 30314613
Value Health. 2007 Sep-Oct;10(5):326-35
pubmed: 17888097
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2019 Nov;54(5):633-641
pubmed: 31202921
Br J Gen Pract. 2016 Sep;66(650):e633-9
pubmed: 27402969
Health Econ. 2000 Mar;9(2):177-80
pubmed: 10721019
Value Health. 2019 Nov;22(11):1275-1282
pubmed: 31708064
J Am Assoc Nurse Pract. 2017 Jan;29(1):12-16
pubmed: 27245885
Antibiotics (Basel). 2019 Sep 27;8(4):
pubmed: 31569624
J Mark Access Health Policy. 2017 Feb 17;5(1):1283105
pubmed: 28265350
J Glob Infect Dis. 2019 Jan-Mar;11(1):36-42
pubmed: 30814834
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2019 Dec 21;8:204
pubmed: 31890160
Value Health. 2018 Feb;21(2):119-123
pubmed: 29477388
Health Econ. 2019 Apr;28(4):556-571
pubmed: 30746802
PLoS Med. 2006 Jul;3(7):e241
pubmed: 16796403
MDM Policy Pract. 2019 Dec 12;4(2):2381468319892237
pubmed: 31910245