Association between the number of pulls and adverse neonatal/maternal outcomes in vacuum-assisted delivery.


Journal

Journal of perinatal medicine
ISSN: 1619-3997
Titre abrégé: J Perinat Med
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 0361031

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
25 Jun 2021
Historique:
received: 09 09 2020
accepted: 27 01 2021
pubmed: 19 2 2021
medline: 27 11 2021
entrez: 18 2 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

To determine the association between the number of pulls during vacuum-assisted deliver and neonatal and maternal complications. This was a single-center observational study using a cohort of pregnancies who underwent vacuum-assisted delivery from 2013 to 2020. We excluded pregnancies transitioning to cesarean section after a failed attempt at vacuum-assisted delivery. The number of pulls to deliver the neonate was categorized into 1, 2, 3, and ≥4 pulls. We used logistic regression models to investigate the association between the number of pulls and neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission and maternal composite outcome (severe perineal laceration, cervical laceration, transfusion, and postpartum hemorrhage ≥500 mL). We extracted 480 vacuum-assisted deliveries among 7,321 vaginal deliveries. The proportion of pregnancies receiving 1, 2, 3, or ≥4 pulls were 51.9, 28.3, 10.8, and 9.0%, respectively. The crude prevalence of NICU admission with 1, 2, 3, and ≥4 pulls were 10.8, 16.2, 15.4, and 27.9%, respectively. The prevalence of NICU admission, amount of postpartum hemorrhage, and postpartum hemorrhage ≥500 mL were significantly different between the four groups. Multivariable logistic regression analysis found the prevalence of NICU admission in the ≥4 pulls group was significantly higher compared with the 1 pull group (adjusted odds ratio, 3.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.4-7.8). In contrast, maternal complications were not significantly associated with the number of pulls. Vacuum-assisted delivery with four or more pulls was significantly associated with an increased risk of NICU admission. However, the number of pulls was not associated with maternal complications.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33600672
pii: jpm-2020-0433
doi: 10.1515/jpm-2020-0433
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Observational Study

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

583-589

Informations de copyright

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.

Références

Souza, JP, Gülmezoglu, AM, Lumbiganon, P, Laopaiboon, M, Carroli, G, Fawole, B, et al.. Caesarean section without medical indications is associated with an increased risk of adverse short-term maternal outcomes: the 2004-2008 WHO Global Survey on Maternal and Perinatal Health. BMC Med 2010;8:71.
Operative Vaginal Birth. ACOG practice bulletin, number 219. Obstet Gynecol 2020;135:e149–59.
Staat, B, Combs, CA. SMFM Special Statement: operative vaginal delivery: checklists for performance and documentation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2020;222:B15–21.
Parish, B, Vasilie, Y. No. 381-assisted vaginal birth. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2019;41:870–82.
Vayssire, C, Beucher, G, Dupuis, O, Feraud, O, Simon-Toulza, C, Sentilhes, L, et al.. Instrumental delivery: clinical practice guidelines from the French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2011;159:43–8.
Minakami, H, Maeda, T, Fujii, T, Hamada, H, Iitsuka, Y, Itakura, A, et al.. Guidelines for obstetrical practice in Japan: Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology (JSOG) and Japan Association of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (JAOG) 2014 edition. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2014;40:1469–99.
Miksovsky, P, Watson, WJ. Obstetric vacuum extraction: state of the art in the new millennium. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2001;56:736–51.
Vacca, A. Vacuum-assisted delivery: an analysis of traction force and maternal and neonatal outcomes. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2006;46:124–7.
Miller, ES, Lai, Y, Bailit, J, Reddy, UM, Wapner, RJ, Varner, MW, et al.. Duration of operative vaginal delivery and adverse obstetric outcomes. Am J Perinatol 2020;37:503–10.
Levin, G, Elchalal, U, Yagel, S, Eventov-Friedman, S, Ezra, Y, Sompolinsky, Y, et al.. Risk factors associated with subgaleal hemorrhage in neonates exposed to vacuum extraction. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2019;98:1464–72.
Harris, M, Beckley, SL, Garibaldi, JM, Keith, RDF, Greene, KR. Umbilical cord blood gas analysis at the time of delivery. Midwifery 1996;12:146–50.
Odd, DE, Doyle, P, Gunnell, D, Lewis, G, Whitelaw, A, Rasmussen, F. Risk of low Apgar score and socioeconomic position: a study of Swedish male births. Acta Paediatr 2008;97:1275–80.
Muraca, GM, Skoll, A, Lisonkova, S, Sabr, Y, Brant, R, Cundiff, GW, et al.. Perinatal and maternal morbidity and mortality among term singletons following midcavity operative vaginal delivery versus caesarean delivery. BJOG 2018;125:693–702.
Furrer, R, Schäffer, L, Kimmich, N, Zimmermann, R, Haslinger, C. Maternal and fetal outcomes after uterine fundal pressure in spontaneous and assisted vaginal deliveries. J Perinat Med 2015;44:767–72.
Ekéus, C, Wrangsell, K, Penttinen, S, Åberg, K. Neonatal complications among 596 infants delivered by vacuum extraction (in relation to characteristics of the extraction). J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2018;31:2402–08.
Åberg, K, Norman, M, Pettersson, K, Järnbert-Pettersson, H, Ekéus, C. Protracted vacuum extraction and neonatal intracranial hemorrhage among infants born at term: a nationwide case-control study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2019;98:523–32.
Hanigan, WC, Powell, FC, Miller, TC, Wright, RM. Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage in full-term infants. Childs Nerv Syst 1995;11:698–707.
Cunningham, FG, Leveno, KJ, Bloom, SL, Dashe, J, Hoffman, BL, Casey, BM SC. Williams obstetrics, 25th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2018:553–66 pp.
Bodner-Adler, B, Kimberger, O, Käfer, A, Husslein, P, Bodner, K. Management of the perineum during delivery with the kiwi omnicup: Effects of mediolateral episiotomy on anal sphincter tears in nulliparous women. Gynecol Obstet Invest 2018;83:171–8.
Baskett, TF, Fanning, CA, Young, DC. A prospective observational study of 1000 vacuum assisted deliveries with the OmniCup device. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2008;30:573–80.

Auteurs

Kyosuke Kamijo (K)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Iida Municipal Hospital, Iida, Japan.

Daisuke Shigemi (D)

Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Health Economics, School of Public Health, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.

Mikio Nakajima (M)

Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Health Economics, School of Public Health, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Emergency and Critical Care Center, Tokyo Metropolitan Hiroo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.

Richard H Kaszynski (RH)

Emergency and Critical Care Center, Tokyo Metropolitan Hiroo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.

Satoshi Ohira (S)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Iida Municipal Hospital, Iida, Japan.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH