Perception of and anxiety about COVID-19 infection and risk behaviors for spreading infection: an international comparison.
Anxiety
COVID-19
International comparison
Precautionary behaviors
Questionnaire survey
Journal
Annals of general psychiatry
ISSN: 1744-859X
Titre abrégé: Ann Gen Psychiatry
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101236515
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
18 Feb 2021
18 Feb 2021
Historique:
received:
13
09
2020
accepted:
01
02
2021
entrez:
19
2
2021
pubmed:
20
2
2021
medline:
20
2
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To control the spread of the new SARS-CoV-2 infection's disease (COVID-19), appropriate precautionary behaviors by the public should be promoted. There are international differences in public cognitive and behavioral pattern, attitudes toward information sources, and anxiety about COVID-19. Information about these differences could increase understanding of the patterns of epidemic-related anxiety and behavior, and would help optimize future policies for preventing the next wave of the epidemic. To examine between-country differences in perception, attitude, and precautionary behaviors toward COVID-19, we conducted a cross-sectional study using an online questionnaire survey. Participants were adults who had been registered in Cross Marketing Group Inc. and living in the UK, Spain, or Japan. A total of 8,000 people stratified by age were recruited on a first-come, first-serve basis. Knowledge of and anxiety about COVID-19, the frequency of access and perceived credibility of several information sources, and the frequency of each precautionary behavior were examined on March 27-28, 2020, in Japan and April 17-21, 2020, in the UK and Spain. Knowledge, anxiety, and the frequency of precautionary behaviors were higher in the UK and Spain than in Japan. Participants with infected acquaintances were more concerned about COVID-19. However, participants in the UK rarely wore a medical mask. Participants in the UK and Spain were more eager to obtain information about COVID-19 than those in Japan. Participants in Spain tended not to trust official information and to believe specialists' comments instead. The rapidity of the spread of COVID-19, cultural background, and recent political situations seemed to contribute to the international differences here.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
To control the spread of the new SARS-CoV-2 infection's disease (COVID-19), appropriate precautionary behaviors by the public should be promoted. There are international differences in public cognitive and behavioral pattern, attitudes toward information sources, and anxiety about COVID-19. Information about these differences could increase understanding of the patterns of epidemic-related anxiety and behavior, and would help optimize future policies for preventing the next wave of the epidemic.
METHODS
METHODS
To examine between-country differences in perception, attitude, and precautionary behaviors toward COVID-19, we conducted a cross-sectional study using an online questionnaire survey. Participants were adults who had been registered in Cross Marketing Group Inc. and living in the UK, Spain, or Japan. A total of 8,000 people stratified by age were recruited on a first-come, first-serve basis. Knowledge of and anxiety about COVID-19, the frequency of access and perceived credibility of several information sources, and the frequency of each precautionary behavior were examined on March 27-28, 2020, in Japan and April 17-21, 2020, in the UK and Spain.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Knowledge, anxiety, and the frequency of precautionary behaviors were higher in the UK and Spain than in Japan. Participants with infected acquaintances were more concerned about COVID-19. However, participants in the UK rarely wore a medical mask. Participants in the UK and Spain were more eager to obtain information about COVID-19 than those in Japan. Participants in Spain tended not to trust official information and to believe specialists' comments instead.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
The rapidity of the spread of COVID-19, cultural background, and recent political situations seemed to contribute to the international differences here.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33602250
doi: 10.1186/s12991-021-00334-6
pii: 10.1186/s12991-021-00334-6
pmc: PMC7890773
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
13Références
Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2020 Apr;74(4):281-282
pubmed: 32034840
J Hum Ergol (Tokyo). 2011 Dec;40(1-2):151-6
pubmed: 25665219
Curr Med Sci. 2020 Apr;40(2):295-300
pubmed: 32232652
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2015 Apr;9(2):207-19
pubmed: 25882127
Psychol Med. 2020 May 21;:1-13
pubmed: 32436485
Int J Ment Health Addict. 2020 Apr 27;:1-14
pubmed: 32346359
Proc Math Phys Eng Sci. 2020 Jun;476(2238):20200376
pubmed: 32821237
Brain Behav Immun Health. 2020 Jul;6:100101
pubmed: 32835297
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Apr 27;17(9):
pubmed: 32349253
Int J Health Geogr. 2020 Mar 11;19(1):8
pubmed: 32160889
Nat Med. 2020 May;26(5):672-675
pubmed: 32296168
PLoS One. 2009 Dec 03;4(12):e8032
pubmed: 19997505