Identifying the Best Candidates for Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography as the Primary Staging Approach Among Men with High-risk Prostate Cancer and Negative Conventional Imaging.
Conventional imaging
Gleason grade
Nomogram
Overall upstaging
Percent positive core
Positron emission tomography/computed tomography
Prostate cancer
Prostate-specific membrane antigen
Staging
Journal
European urology oncology
ISSN: 2588-9311
Titre abrégé: Eur Urol Oncol
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101724904
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 2022
02 2022
Historique:
received:
04
09
2020
revised:
19
01
2021
accepted:
28
01
2021
pubmed:
20
2
2021
medline:
6
5
2022
entrez:
19
2
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) is an emerging imaging modality with greater sensitivity and specificity over conventional imaging for prostate cancer (PCa) staging. Using data from two prospective trials (NCT03368547 and NCT04050215), we explored predictors of overall upstaging (nodal and metastatic) by PSMA PET/CT among patients with cN0M0 National Comprehensive Cancer Network high-risk PCa on conventional imaging (n = 213). Overall, 21.1%, 8.9%, and 23.9% of patients experienced nodal, metastatic, and overall upstaging, respectively, without histologic confirmation. On multivariable analysis, Gleason grade group (GG) and percent positive core (PPC) on systematic biopsy significantly predict overall upstaging (odds ratio [OR] 2.15, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.33-3.45; p = 0.002; and OR 1.03, 95% CI 1.01-1.04; p < 0.001). Overall upstaging was significantly more frequent among men with GG 5 disease (33.0% vs. 17.6%; p = 0.0097) and PPC ≥50% (33.0% vs 15.0%; p = 0.0020). We constructed a nomogram that predicts overall upstaging using initial prostate-specific antigen, PPC, GG, and cT stage, with coefficients estimated from a standard logistic regression model (using maximum likelihood estimation). It is internally validated with a tenfold cross-validated area under the receiver operating characteristic curve estimated at 0.74 (95% CI 0.67-0.82). In our cohort, 90% of patients who had a nomogram-estimated risk below the cutoff of 22% for overall upstaging could have been spared PSMA PET/CT as our model correctly predicted no upstaging. In other words, the predictive model only missed 10% of patients who would otherwise have benefitted from PSMA PET/CT. PATIENT SUMMARY: We analyzed predictors of overall upstaging (lymph node or/and metastasis) by prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) from conventional imaging in men with high-risk prostate cancer undergoing initial staging deemed free of disease in the lymph nodes and distant metastasis by conventional imaging techniques. We found that the pathologic grade and disease burden in a prostate biopsy are associated with upstaging. We also developed a tool that predicts the probability of upstaging according to an individual patient's characteristics. Our study may help in defining patient groups who are most likely to benefit from the addition of a PSMA PET/CT scan.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33602654
pii: S2588-9311(21)00030-4
doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2021.01.006
pmc: PMC10262977
mid: NIHMS1793748
pii:
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT03368547', 'NCT04050215']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
100-103Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P50 CA092131
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Références
Lancet. 2020 Apr 11;395(10231):1208-1216
pubmed: 32209449
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2010 Feb;8(2):162-200
pubmed: 20141676
Eur Urol. 2020 Apr;77(4):403-417
pubmed: 30773328
Eur Urol. 2020 Jan;77(1):3-10
pubmed: 30992160
Urol Oncol. 2020 Sep;38(9):735.e9-735.e15
pubmed: 32654951
J Nucl Med. 2021 Feb;62(2):214-220
pubmed: 32444374
N Engl J Med. 2020 Mar 5;382(10):917-928
pubmed: 32130814
Eur Urol. 2020 Feb;77(2):201-208
pubmed: 31718822