A Susceptible Period of Photic Day-Night Rhythm Loss in Common Marmoset Social Behavior Development.

adult expression alert behavior circadian rhythm developmental age multivariate integration principal component analysis social developmental disorders

Journal

Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience
ISSN: 1662-5153
Titre abrégé: Front Behav Neurosci
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101477952

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2020
Historique:
received: 21 05 2020
accepted: 26 10 2020
entrez: 19 2 2021
pubmed: 20 2 2021
medline: 20 2 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The prevalence of neurodevelopmental psychiatric disorders such as pervasive developmental disorders is rapidly increasing worldwide. Although these developmental disorders are known to be influenced by an individual's genetic background, the potential biological responses to early life's environmental exposure to both physical and psychological factors must also be considered. Many studies have acknowledged the influence of shorter time for rest at night and the simultaneous occurrence of various kinds of complications involving developmental disorders. In a prior study, we examined how a common marmoset's (Callithrix jacchus) psychosocial development was affected when it was reared under constant daylight from birth and then reared individually by humans nursing them under constant light (LL) during their juvenile development stages. The behaviors of these marmosets were compared with those of normal day-night cycle (LD) marmosets using a multivariate analysis based on principal component analysis (PCA). That study found that LL marmosets relatively elicited egg-like calls (Ecall) and side-to-side shakes of the upper body with rapid head rotation through adulthood frequently. Based on the PCA, these behaviors were interpreted as "alert" or "hyperactive" states. However, we did not clarify susceptible periods of the photic rhythm loss experience and the psychological development output. In this study we summarize the following studies in our model animal colonies involving 30 animals (11 female, 19 males) to further explore critical age states of inquiry about each social behavior profiling. We compared social behaviors of three age stages, juvenile, adolescent and young adult equivalent to one another in four LL experience conditions, LL (postnatal day (P) 0 to around 150), Middle (P60-149, 90 days), Late (P150-239, 90 days), and LD (no experience). In the most representative 1st and 2nd principal component scores, the shifting to higher frequency of alert behaviors developed at the adult stage in LL, Middle, then Late in turn. The no LL experience group, LD, generally featured higher frequency of local preference of high position compared to LL experience present groups, in adulthood. This limited model primate study might inspire different developmental age sensitive mechanisms of neuronal network to control socio-emotional functions by utilizing the multivariate visualization method, BOUQUET. This study could potentially contribute to nurturing educational designs for social developmental disorders.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33603653
doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2020.539411
pmc: PMC7884770
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

539411

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 Koshiba, Watarai-Senoo, Karino, Ozawa, Kamei, Honda, Tanaka, Kodama, Usui and Tokuno.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Références

J Acoust Soc Am. 2006 Sep;120(3):1655-70
pubmed: 17004487
Ind Health. 2019 Apr 1;57(2):139-157
pubmed: 30700667
Front Integr Neurosci. 2013 Apr 24;7:30
pubmed: 23630476
J Neurosci. 2004 Feb 4;24(5):1182-9
pubmed: 14762136
Autism Res. 2018 Apr;11(4):554-586
pubmed: 29573218
Expert Rev Neurother. 2014 Jul;14(7):745-55
pubmed: 24902476
Neurosci Res. 2015 Apr;93:91-8
pubmed: 25305341
Integr Comp Biol. 2014 Jul;54(1):21-30
pubmed: 24861811
PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e58847
pubmed: 23520539
Dev Psychobiol. 2005 Nov;47(3):230-42
pubmed: 16252291
Front Pediatr. 2015 Feb 23;3:1
pubmed: 25756039
Front Neuroendocrinol. 2014 Aug;35(3):320-30
pubmed: 24887405
Expert Opin Drug Discov. 2019 Apr;14(4):365-378
pubmed: 30793996
Sci Signal. 2012 Oct 09;5(245):pt6
pubmed: 23047921
Bipolar Disord. 2019 Dec;21(8):741-773
pubmed: 31609530
Behav Brain Res. 2013 Sep 1;252:1-9
pubmed: 23714074
Early Hum Dev. 2014 Sep;90(9):535-40
pubmed: 24831970
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Sep 19;17(18):
pubmed: 32961676
Sci Rep. 2013;3:2630
pubmed: 24022241
Physiol Behav. 2016 Mar 1;155:242-9
pubmed: 26724713
Science. 2020 Sep 4;369(6508):1164-1165
pubmed: 32883849
Biol Psychiatry. 2013 Oct 15;74(8):585-90
pubmed: 23523340
Curr Biol. 2018 Nov 19;28(22):3685-3690.e3
pubmed: 30416064
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Aug 10;101(32):11909-14
pubmed: 15282371
Horm Behav. 2006 Feb;49(2):237-45
pubmed: 16102763
CNS Neurol Disord Drug Targets. 2016;15(5):578-86
pubmed: 27071788
Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2011 Aug 1;35(6):1493-8
pubmed: 21238530
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2015 Mar;50:189-203
pubmed: 25445180
Schizophr Res. 2017 Nov;189:37-42
pubmed: 28169087
Front Psychiatry. 2019 Nov 25;10:849
pubmed: 31824351
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2016 Jun;65:292-312
pubmed: 27048961
Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2018 Apr;90:110-121
pubmed: 29482133
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2016 Jan;17(1):45-59
pubmed: 26675822
Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2012 Jan;100(3):518-21
pubmed: 22067683
Behav Brain Res. 2010 Apr 2;208(2):553-9
pubmed: 20060021
Neurosci Lett. 2013 Jun 28;547:70-5
pubmed: 23689249
Memory. 2018 Aug;26(7):904-912
pubmed: 29534645
Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes. 2015 Feb;22(1):41-7
pubmed: 25517022
Clin Psychopharmacol Neurosci. 2017 Feb 28;15(1):9-18
pubmed: 28138105
Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2011 Aug 1;35(6):1499-504
pubmed: 21300127
Sci Rep. 2013;3:2503
pubmed: 23974241
Am J Primatol. 2010 Aug;72(8):681-8
pubmed: 20301139
Endocrinology. 2014 Jul;155(7):2613-23
pubmed: 24735329
Behav Brain Res. 2015 Jan 1;276:181-9
pubmed: 24933187
Curr Genet Med Rep. 2016;4:147-153
pubmed: 27570713
Med J Aust. 2019 Nov;211 Suppl 9:S3-S46
pubmed: 31679171
Int Rev Psychiatry. 2014 Apr;26(2):139-54
pubmed: 24892891
Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 2007;72:645-54
pubmed: 18419324
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2019 Jun 11;10:279
pubmed: 31244768
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Aug 18;112(33):10479-84
pubmed: 26240359
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 18;12(1):e0170127
pubmed: 28099477

Auteurs

Mamiko Koshiba (M)

Engineering Department, Yamaguchi University, Ube City, Japan.
Pediatrics, Saitama Medical University, Saitama, Japan.
Graduate School of Information Sciences, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.

Aya Watarai-Senoo (A)

Pediatrics, Saitama Medical University, Saitama, Japan.

Genta Karino (G)

Pediatrics, Saitama Medical University, Saitama, Japan.

Shimpei Ozawa (S)

Pediatrics, Saitama Medical University, Saitama, Japan.

Yoshimasa Kamei (Y)

Obstetrics and Gynecology, Saitama Medical University, Saitama, Japan.

Yoshiko Honda (Y)

Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Medical Science, Setagaya, Japan.

Ikuko Tanaka (I)

Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Medical Science, Setagaya, Japan.

Tohru Kodama (T)

Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Medical Science, Setagaya, Japan.

Setsuo Usui (S)

Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Medical Science, Setagaya, Japan.

Hironobu Tokuno (H)

Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Medical Science, Setagaya, Japan.

Classifications MeSH