The Effect of Crank Resistance on Arm Configuration and Muscle Activation Variances in Arm Cycling Movements.

force control joint configuration kinematic control load muscle activation variance

Journal

Journal of human kinetics
ISSN: 1640-5544
Titre abrégé: J Hum Kinet
Pays: Poland
ID NLM: 101513031

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jan 2021
Historique:
entrez: 19 2 2021
pubmed: 20 2 2021
medline: 20 2 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Arm cycling on an ergometer is common in sports training and rehabilitation protocols. The hand movement is constrained along a circular path, and the user is working against a resistance, maintaining a cadence. Even if the desired hand trajectory is given, there is the flexibility to choose patterns of joint coordination and muscle activation, given the kinematic redundancy of the upper limb. With changing external load, motor noise and changing joint stiffness may affect the pose of the arm even though the endpoint trajectory is unchanged. The objective of this study was to examine how the crank resistance influences the variances of joint configuration and muscle activation. Fifteen healthy participants performed arm cranking on an arm-cycle ergometer both unimanually and bimanually with a cadence of 60 rpm against three crank resistances. Joint configuration was represented in a 3-dimensional joint space defined by inter-segmental joint angles, while muscle activation in a 4-dimensional "muscle activation space" defined by EMGs of 4 arm muscles. Joint configuration variance in the course of arm cranking was not affected by crank resistance, whereas muscle activation variance was proportional to the square of muscle activation. The shape of the variance time profiles for both joint configuration and muscle activation was not affected by crank resistance. Contrary to the prevailing assumption that an increased motor noise would affect the variance of auxiliary movements, the influence of noise doesn't appear at the joint configuration level even when the system is redundant. Our results suggest the separation of kinematic- and force-control, via mechanisms that are compensating for dynamic nonlinearities. Arm cranking may be suitable when the aim is to perform training under different load conditions, preserving stable and secure control of joint movements and muscle activations.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33603933
doi: 10.2478/hukin-2021-0053
pii: hukin-2021-0053
pmc: PMC7877280
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

175-189

Informations de copyright

© 2021 Mariann Mravcsik, Lilla Botzheim, Norbert Zentai, Davide Piovesan, Jozsef Laczko, published by Sciendo.

Références

J Rehabil Med. 2013 Mar;45(3):254-9
pubmed: 23307336
Biol Cybern. 2007 Feb;96(2):147-63
pubmed: 17031664
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2013 Jan;45(1):206-11
pubmed: 22843110
Exp Brain Res. 2000 Nov;135(1):66-72
pubmed: 11104128
PeerJ. 2020 Sep 15;8:e9759
pubmed: 32983635
Exp Brain Res. 1999 Jun;126(3):289-306
pubmed: 10382616
J Neurophysiol. 2012 Dec;108(11):3049-58
pubmed: 22956797
Exp Brain Res. 1999 Jul;127(2):171-81
pubmed: 10442409
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2013 Oct;113(10):2541-52
pubmed: 23838725
J Neurophysiol. 2018 Mar 1;119(3):1095-1112
pubmed: 29212917
J Neurophysiol. 2015 Oct;114(4):2285-94
pubmed: 26289462
Neuroscience. 2017 May 14;350:54-64
pubmed: 28344068
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1991 Sep;23(9):1097-101
pubmed: 1943632
J Neurophysiol. 2018 Jun 1;119(6):2194-2211
pubmed: 29364074
J Med Syst. 2010 Aug;34(4):741-53
pubmed: 20703930
Spinal Cord. 2015 May;53(5):395-401
pubmed: 25622729
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2011;2011:4076-81
pubmed: 22255236
J Mot Behav. 2006 Sep;38(5):383-404
pubmed: 16968684
Exp Brain Res. 2007 May;179(2):199-208
pubmed: 17119939
Exp Brain Res. 2011 Jun;211(2):299-312
pubmed: 21516330
J Sci Med Sport. 2004 Dec;7(4):473-80
pubmed: 15712504
J Neurophysiol. 1999 Apr;81(4):1458-68
pubmed: 10200182
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2005 Oct;120(2):172-98
pubmed: 15939387
J Neurosci. 2009 Mar 25;29(12):3939-47
pubmed: 19321790
Int J Rehabil Res. 2009 Mar;32(1):53-63
pubmed: 19077724
J Neurophysiol. 2012 Aug 1;108(3):891-905
pubmed: 22572949
Front Neurorobot. 2011 Dec 27;5:4
pubmed: 22207846
J Neurophysiol. 2018 Dec 1;120(6):2908-2921
pubmed: 30354778
Brain Sci. 2016 Dec 15;6(4):
pubmed: 27983685
PLoS One. 2010 Jun 17;5(6):e11189
pubmed: 20567516
J Mot Behav. 2004 Sep;36(3):265-79
pubmed: 15262623
J Neurophysiol. 1995 Mar;73(3):1201-22
pubmed: 7608766

Auteurs

Mariann Mravcsik (M)

Department of Computational Sciences, Wigner Research Centre for Physics, Budapest, H-1121 Hungary.
Department of Information Technology and Biorobotics, Faculty of Sciences, University of Pécs, H-7624 Hungary.

Lilla Botzheim (L)

Department of Computational Sciences, Wigner Research Centre for Physics, Budapest, H-1121 Hungary.
Department of Information Technology and Biorobotics, Faculty of Sciences, University of Pécs, H-7624 Hungary.

Norbert Zentai (N)

Department of Information Technology and Biorobotics, Faculty of Sciences, University of Pécs, H-7624 Hungary.

Davide Piovesan (D)

Gannon University, Department of Biomedical, Industrial and Systems Engineering, Erie PA16501. USA.

Jozsef Laczko (J)

Department of Computational Sciences, Wigner Research Centre for Physics, Budapest, H-1121 Hungary.
Department of Information Technology and Biorobotics, Faculty of Sciences, University of Pécs, H-7624 Hungary.
Department of Physiology, Feinberg School of Medicine Northwestern University, Chicago IL6061. USA.

Classifications MeSH