Associations Between Digital Health Intervention Engagement, Physical Activity, and Sedentary Behavior: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

adherence digital behavior change intervention digital health intervention engagement mobile phone physical activity sedentary behavior

Journal

Journal of medical Internet research
ISSN: 1438-8871
Titre abrégé: J Med Internet Res
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 100959882

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
19 02 2021
Historique:
received: 04 08 2020
accepted: 07 12 2020
revised: 18 11 2020
entrez: 19 2 2021
pubmed: 20 2 2021
medline: 29 5 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The effectiveness of digital health interventions is commonly assumed to be related to the level of user engagement with the digital health intervention, including measures of both digital health intervention use and users' subjective experience. However, little is known about the relationships between the measures of digital health intervention engagement and physical activity or sedentary behavior. This study aims to describe the direction and strength of the association between engagement with digital health interventions and physical activity or sedentary behavior in adults and explore whether the direction of association of digital health intervention engagement with physical activity or sedentary behavior varies with the type of engagement with the digital health intervention (ie, subjective experience, activities completed, time, and logins). Four databases were searched from inception to December 2019. Grey literature and reference lists of key systematic reviews and journals were also searched. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they examined a quantitative association between a measure of engagement with a digital health intervention targeting physical activity and a measure of physical activity or sedentary behavior in adults (aged ≥18 years). Studies that purposely sampled or recruited individuals on the basis of pre-existing health-related conditions were excluded. In addition, studies were excluded if the individual engaging with the digital health intervention was not the target of the physical activity intervention, the study had a non-digital health intervention component, or the digital health interventions targeted multiple health behaviors. A random effects meta-analysis and direction of association vote counting (for studies not included in meta-analysis) were used to address objective 1. Objective 2 used vote counting on the direction of the association. Overall, 10,653 unique citations were identified and 375 full texts were reviewed. Of these, 19 studies (26 associations) were included in the review, with no studies reporting a measure of sedentary behavior. A meta-analysis of 11 studies indicated a small statistically significant positive association between digital health engagement (based on all usage measures) and physical activity (0.08, 95% CI 0.01-0.14, SD 0.11). Heterogeneity was high, with 77% of the variation in the point estimates explained by the between-study heterogeneity. Vote counting indicated that the relationship between physical activity and digital health intervention engagement was consistently positive for three measures: subjective experience measures (2 of 3 associations), activities completed (5 of 8 associations), and logins (6 of 10 associations). However, the direction of associations between physical activity and time-based measures of usage (time spent using the intervention) were mixed (2 of 5 associations supported the hypothesis, 2 were inconclusive, and 1 rejected the hypothesis). The findings indicate a weak but consistent positive association between engagement with a physical activity digital health intervention and physical activity outcomes. No studies have targeted sedentary behavior outcomes. The findings were consistent across most constructs of engagement; however, the associations were weak.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
The effectiveness of digital health interventions is commonly assumed to be related to the level of user engagement with the digital health intervention, including measures of both digital health intervention use and users' subjective experience. However, little is known about the relationships between the measures of digital health intervention engagement and physical activity or sedentary behavior.
OBJECTIVE
This study aims to describe the direction and strength of the association between engagement with digital health interventions and physical activity or sedentary behavior in adults and explore whether the direction of association of digital health intervention engagement with physical activity or sedentary behavior varies with the type of engagement with the digital health intervention (ie, subjective experience, activities completed, time, and logins).
METHODS
Four databases were searched from inception to December 2019. Grey literature and reference lists of key systematic reviews and journals were also searched. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they examined a quantitative association between a measure of engagement with a digital health intervention targeting physical activity and a measure of physical activity or sedentary behavior in adults (aged ≥18 years). Studies that purposely sampled or recruited individuals on the basis of pre-existing health-related conditions were excluded. In addition, studies were excluded if the individual engaging with the digital health intervention was not the target of the physical activity intervention, the study had a non-digital health intervention component, or the digital health interventions targeted multiple health behaviors. A random effects meta-analysis and direction of association vote counting (for studies not included in meta-analysis) were used to address objective 1. Objective 2 used vote counting on the direction of the association.
RESULTS
Overall, 10,653 unique citations were identified and 375 full texts were reviewed. Of these, 19 studies (26 associations) were included in the review, with no studies reporting a measure of sedentary behavior. A meta-analysis of 11 studies indicated a small statistically significant positive association between digital health engagement (based on all usage measures) and physical activity (0.08, 95% CI 0.01-0.14, SD 0.11). Heterogeneity was high, with 77% of the variation in the point estimates explained by the between-study heterogeneity. Vote counting indicated that the relationship between physical activity and digital health intervention engagement was consistently positive for three measures: subjective experience measures (2 of 3 associations), activities completed (5 of 8 associations), and logins (6 of 10 associations). However, the direction of associations between physical activity and time-based measures of usage (time spent using the intervention) were mixed (2 of 5 associations supported the hypothesis, 2 were inconclusive, and 1 rejected the hypothesis).
CONCLUSIONS
The findings indicate a weak but consistent positive association between engagement with a physical activity digital health intervention and physical activity outcomes. No studies have targeted sedentary behavior outcomes. The findings were consistent across most constructs of engagement; however, the associations were weak.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33605897
pii: v23i2e23180
doi: 10.2196/23180
pmc: PMC8011420
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Meta-Analysis Systematic Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e23180

Commentaires et corrections

Type : ErratumIn

Informations de copyright

©Matthew Mclaughlin, Tessa Delaney, Alix Hall, Judith Byaruhanga, Paul Mackie, Alice Grady, Kathryn Reilly, Elizabeth Campbell, Rachel Sutherland, John Wiggers, Luke Wolfenden. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 19.02.2021.

Références

Ann Intern Med. 2009 Aug 18;151(4):264-9, W64
pubmed: 19622511
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Nov 14;11:CD012439
pubmed: 30480770
Br J Sports Med. 2019 Dec;53(24):1553-1554
pubmed: 29970409
Digit Health. 2018 Feb 1;4:2055207617743354
pubmed: 29942622
JMIR Res Protoc. 2013 Apr 29;2(1):e16
pubmed: 23649858
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2017 Aug 03;5(8):e114
pubmed: 28778846
JAMA Cardiol. 2016 Aug 01;1(5):575-83
pubmed: 27434872
Prev Med. 2009 Feb;48(2):144-50
pubmed: 19028519
J Med Internet Res. 2012 Oct 30;14(5):e145
pubmed: 23111127
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Apr 18;20(4):e122
pubmed: 29669703
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015 Sep;13(3):163-9
pubmed: 26262566
Health Psychol Behav Med. 2014 Jan 1;2(1):455-481
pubmed: 25750795
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Jul 13;17(7):e174
pubmed: 26169067
Psychiatr Serv. 2019 Jul 1;70(7):538-544
pubmed: 30914003
J Phys Act Health. 2009 Jul;6(4):444-55
pubmed: 19842458
J Med Internet Res. 2009 Jul 28;11(3):e23
pubmed: 19666456
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 2;12(2):e0170581
pubmed: 28152012
J Med Internet Res. 2014 Feb 14;16(2):e40
pubmed: 24550083
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2016 Oct 10;13(1):109
pubmed: 27724911
Prev Med. 2008 Nov;47(5):508-13
pubmed: 18773915
BMJ. 2019 Aug 21;366:l4570
pubmed: 31434697
J Med Internet Res. 2013 Oct 16;15(10):e223
pubmed: 24132044
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Jul 24;21(7):e13063
pubmed: 31342902
Arch Intern Med. 2007 May 14;167(9):944-9
pubmed: 17502536
Prev Med. 2008 May;46(5):431-8
pubmed: 18207228
Ann Intern Med. 2015 Jan 20;162(2):123-32
pubmed: 25599350
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2017 Oct 30;5(10):e164
pubmed: 29084709
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Mar 19;21(3):e12053
pubmed: 30888321
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Jan 08;18(1):e6
pubmed: 26747176
Transl Behav Med. 2018 Nov 21;8(6):953-957
pubmed: 29660093
Transl Behav Med. 2017 Jun;7(2):254-267
pubmed: 27966189
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Jun 29;19(6):e232
pubmed: 28663162
Diabetes Care. 2001 Aug;24(8):1328-34
pubmed: 11473065
Sports Med. 2014 May;44(5):671-86
pubmed: 24497157
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Jun 15;20(6):e217
pubmed: 29907559
JMIR Form Res. 2019 Oct 10;3(4):e14052
pubmed: 31603427
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012 Apr 30;9:52
pubmed: 22546283
Am J Cardiol. 2012 Jun 15;109(12):1754-60
pubmed: 22494850
J Med Internet Res. 2011 Aug 05;13(3):e52
pubmed: 21821503
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Nov 10;17(11):e253
pubmed: 26554314
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Feb 28;(2):CD007651
pubmed: 23450577
PLoS One. 2016 Jan 25;11(1):e0147601
pubmed: 26808317
Public Health. 2017 Nov;152:36-46
pubmed: 28734170
J Med Internet Res. 2012 Jan 11;14(1):e4
pubmed: 22260810
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2017 Feb 28;17(1):25
pubmed: 28241759
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Nov 27;21(11):e14645
pubmed: 31774402
BMJ. 2020 Jan 16;368:l6890
pubmed: 31948937
J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 May 16;6(5):
pubmed: 28512111

Auteurs

Matthew Mclaughlin (M)

School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia.
Hunter New England Population Health, Wallsend, Australia.
Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, Australia.
Priority Research Centre for Heath Behaviour, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia.

Tessa Delaney (T)

School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia.
Hunter New England Population Health, Wallsend, Australia.
Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, Australia.
Priority Research Centre for Heath Behaviour, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia.

Alix Hall (A)

School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia.
Hunter New England Population Health, Wallsend, Australia.
Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, Australia.
Priority Research Centre for Heath Behaviour, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia.

Judith Byaruhanga (J)

School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia.
Hunter New England Population Health, Wallsend, Australia.
Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, Australia.
Priority Research Centre for Heath Behaviour, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia.

Paul Mackie (P)

School of Health Sciences and Priority Research Centre for Stroke and Brain Injury, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia.
Centre for Research Excellence in Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation, Florey Institute of Neuroscience, Melbourne, Australia.

Alice Grady (A)

School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia.
Hunter New England Population Health, Wallsend, Australia.
Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, Australia.
Priority Research Centre for Heath Behaviour, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia.

Kathryn Reilly (K)

School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia.
Hunter New England Population Health, Wallsend, Australia.
Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, Australia.
Priority Research Centre for Heath Behaviour, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia.

Elizabeth Campbell (E)

School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia.
Hunter New England Population Health, Wallsend, Australia.
Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, Australia.
Priority Research Centre for Heath Behaviour, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia.

Rachel Sutherland (R)

School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia.
Hunter New England Population Health, Wallsend, Australia.
Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, Australia.
Priority Research Centre for Heath Behaviour, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia.

John Wiggers (J)

School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia.
Hunter New England Population Health, Wallsend, Australia.
Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, Australia.
Priority Research Centre for Heath Behaviour, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia.

Luke Wolfenden (L)

School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia.
Hunter New England Population Health, Wallsend, Australia.
Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, Australia.
Priority Research Centre for Heath Behaviour, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH