Perineal reconstruction with pedicled rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap after posterior pelvic exenteration -A 3D model study.

Case-Series Computed tomography Pedicled-Rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap Perineal reconstruction Three-Dimensional model

Journal

International journal of surgery case reports
ISSN: 2210-2612
Titre abrégé: Int J Surg Case Rep
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101529872

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Mar 2021
Historique:
received: 25 01 2021
revised: 04 02 2021
accepted: 04 02 2021
pubmed: 21 2 2021
medline: 21 2 2021
entrez: 20 2 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Limited literature exists regarding the positional relationship between the pedicled-rectus abdominis myocutaneous (p-RAMC) flap and residual pelvic organs post posterior pelvic exenteration (PPE). Four patients underwent PPE and reconstruction with a p-RAMC flap. After harvesting the p-RAMC flap with the deep inferior epigastric artery and veins as the vascular pedicle, the intra-pelvic shortest pathway of the flap was created. We dissected the subcutaneous tissues of the flap donor site toward the perineal defect along the inner wall of the pelvis. The pubic origin of the rectus abdominis muscle was preserved. A three-dimensional model was constructed using an image processing software. The vascular pedicle ran almost linearly along the inner wall of the pelvis. The muscle belly was placed on the pelvic floor through the posterior wall of the urinary bladder which filled the dead space of the resected area. All flaps survived without significant complications. Assigning the cranial side of the flap to the perineum and caudal side to the pelvic floor could reduce postoperative intrapelvic complications. By preserving the pubic origin of the rectus abdominis muscle, a shock absorber of the pedicle of the flap was created, preventing over-traction of the flap while passing through the intrapelvic pathway. A p-RAMC flap via intra-pelvic shortest pathway is an ideal reconstructive method for large skin defect in perineal area after PPE.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33609946
pii: S2210-2612(21)00125-5
doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2021.02.015
pmc: PMC7903330
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

105629

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Daiki Kitano (D)

Department of Plastic Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, 7-5-2, Kusunoki-cho, Chuo-ku, Kobe, 650-0017, Japan. Electronic address: dkitano.kobe.prs@gmail.com.

Takeo Osaki (T)

Department of Plastic Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, 7-5-2, Kusunoki-cho, Chuo-ku, Kobe, 650-0017, Japan; Department of Plastic Surgery, Hyogo Cancer Center, 13-70, Kitaoji-cho, Akashi, Hyogo, 673-0021, Japan.

Shunsuke Sakakibara (S)

Department of Plastic Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, 7-5-2, Kusunoki-cho, Chuo-ku, Kobe, 650-0017, Japan; Department of Plastic Surgery, Hyogo Cancer Center, 13-70, Kitaoji-cho, Akashi, Hyogo, 673-0021, Japan.

Tadashi Nomura (T)

Department of Plastic Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, 7-5-2, Kusunoki-cho, Chuo-ku, Kobe, 650-0017, Japan.

Kazunobu Hashikawa (K)

Department of Plastic Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, 7-5-2, Kusunoki-cho, Chuo-ku, Kobe, 650-0017, Japan.

Hiroto Terashi (H)

Department of Plastic Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, 7-5-2, Kusunoki-cho, Chuo-ku, Kobe, 650-0017, Japan.

Classifications MeSH