Efficacy and safety of apatinib in recurrent/metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A pilot study.


Journal

Oral oncology
ISSN: 1879-0593
Titre abrégé: Oral Oncol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9709118

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
04 2021
Historique:
received: 07 09 2020
revised: 22 01 2021
accepted: 03 02 2021
pubmed: 21 2 2021
medline: 18 11 2021
entrez: 20 2 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

There is no standard-of-care for recurrent, metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (rmNPC) after first-line chemotherapy. Here, we report the efficacy and safety data of apatinib in rmNPC patients. Thirty-five biopsy-proven rmNPC patients received apatinib at 500 mg/day under a compassionate access programme. Primary end-point was objective response rate (ORR; RECIST v1.1). Kaplan-meier method was used to estimate progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Toxicity was assessed by CTCAE v4.0. 82.9% (29 of 35) of patients had poly-metastatic rmNPC. All patients, except five, were platinum-refractory; 37.1% (13 of 35) received ≥ 2 lines. Median number of apatinib cycles was 4.0 (IQR: 2.0-8.0). ORR was 31.4% (11 of 35 [95% CI: 16.9-49.3]) and disease control rate was 74.3% (26 of 35 [95% CI: 56.7-87.5]); 11 (31.4%) and 4 (11.4%) patients demonstrated response for ≥ 6 and ≥ 12 months, respectively. Median PFS and OS was 3.9 (95% CI: 3.1-5.5) months and 5.8 (95% CI: 4.5-8.0) months, respectively. Among the ≥ 12-month responders, all patients had pre-apatinib EBV DNA titer of <700 (range: 353-622) copies/ml; this was consistent with the association of PFS with pre-apatinib EBV DNA titer (adjusted HR 3.364 [95% CI: 1.428-7.923] for ≥ 4000 copies/ml, P = 0.006). 42.9% (15 of 35) of patients required dose reduction. Nonetheless, only five (14.3%) patients suffered from G3 toxicities (two haematological, one hypertension, one hand-foot syndrome and one elevated aminotransferases). Our data suggests potential efficacy of apatinib in rmNPC patients. Although incidence of severe toxicities was low, dose modification was required in 42.9% of patients.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
There is no standard-of-care for recurrent, metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (rmNPC) after first-line chemotherapy. Here, we report the efficacy and safety data of apatinib in rmNPC patients.
METHODS
Thirty-five biopsy-proven rmNPC patients received apatinib at 500 mg/day under a compassionate access programme. Primary end-point was objective response rate (ORR; RECIST v1.1). Kaplan-meier method was used to estimate progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Toxicity was assessed by CTCAE v4.0.
RESULTS
82.9% (29 of 35) of patients had poly-metastatic rmNPC. All patients, except five, were platinum-refractory; 37.1% (13 of 35) received ≥ 2 lines. Median number of apatinib cycles was 4.0 (IQR: 2.0-8.0). ORR was 31.4% (11 of 35 [95% CI: 16.9-49.3]) and disease control rate was 74.3% (26 of 35 [95% CI: 56.7-87.5]); 11 (31.4%) and 4 (11.4%) patients demonstrated response for ≥ 6 and ≥ 12 months, respectively. Median PFS and OS was 3.9 (95% CI: 3.1-5.5) months and 5.8 (95% CI: 4.5-8.0) months, respectively. Among the ≥ 12-month responders, all patients had pre-apatinib EBV DNA titer of <700 (range: 353-622) copies/ml; this was consistent with the association of PFS with pre-apatinib EBV DNA titer (adjusted HR 3.364 [95% CI: 1.428-7.923] for ≥ 4000 copies/ml, P = 0.006). 42.9% (15 of 35) of patients required dose reduction. Nonetheless, only five (14.3%) patients suffered from G3 toxicities (two haematological, one hypertension, one hand-foot syndrome and one elevated aminotransferases).
CONCLUSION
Our data suggests potential efficacy of apatinib in rmNPC patients. Although incidence of severe toxicities was low, dose modification was required in 42.9% of patients.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33610004
pii: S1368-8375(21)00045-2
doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2021.105222
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Antineoplastic Agents 0
Pyridines 0
apatinib 5S371K6132

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

105222

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Auteurs

Luo Huang (L)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China.

Xin Zhang (X)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China.

Yu Bai (Y)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China.

Kevin L M Chua (KLM)

Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore; Oncology Academic Clinical Programme, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.

Yue Xie (Y)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China.

Xiaolei Shu (X)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China.

Bin Long (B)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China.

Chunbo Fan (C)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China.

Darren W T Lim (DWT)

Oncology Academic Clinical Programme, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore; Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore; IMCB NCC MPI Singapore Oncogenome Laboratory, Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology, Agency for Science, Technology and Research, Singapore.

Sze Huey Tan (SH)

Division of Clinical Trials and Epidemiology Sciences, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore.

Joseph T S Wee (JTS)

Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore; Oncology Academic Clinical Programme, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.

Ying Wang (Y)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China. Electronic address: 13996412826@163.com.

Yongzhong Wu (Y)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China. Electronic address: cqmdwyz@163.com.

Melvin L K Chua (MLK)

Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore; Oncology Academic Clinical Programme, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore; Division of Medical Sciences, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore. Electronic address: melvin.chua.l.k@singhealth.com.sg.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH