Predictors of Visual Acuity Outcomes after Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Treatment for Macular Edema Secondary to Central Retinal Vein Occlusion.
Aged
Angiogenesis Inhibitors
/ administration & dosage
Bevacizumab
/ administration & dosage
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Intravitreal Injections
Macular Edema
/ diagnosis
Male
Middle Aged
Ranibizumab
/ administration & dosage
Receptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor
/ administration & dosage
Recombinant Fusion Proteins
/ administration & dosage
Retinal Vein Occlusion
/ complications
Retrospective Studies
Tomography, Optical Coherence
/ methods
Treatment Outcome
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A
/ antagonists & inhibitors
Visual Acuity
BCVA
LEAVO
Predictors
VEGF
Journal
Ophthalmology. Retina
ISSN: 2468-6530
Titre abrégé: Ophthalmol Retina
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101695048
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 2021
11 2021
Historique:
received:
02
10
2020
revised:
08
02
2021
accepted:
11
02
2021
pubmed:
22
2
2021
medline:
29
1
2022
entrez:
21
2
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To evaluate whether baseline demographic, clinical, and OCT characteristics predict visual acuity (VA) outcomes in patients receiving anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy for macular edema (ME) due to central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO). Post hoc analysis of the randomized noninferiority trial (Lucentis, Eylea, Avastin in CRVO) LEAVO Study from December 12, 2014, to December 16, 2016, carried out across 44 UK National Health Service ophthalmology departments. Data on 267 participants with a baseline best-corrected mean visual acuity (BCVA) range of 19 to 78 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letter score (approximate Snellen equivalent, 20/32 to 20/320) who had central subfield thickness (CST) ≥ 320 μm on Spectralis OCT (Heidelberg Engineering) were analyzed. Study participants were randomized to receive repeated intravitreal injections of ranibizumab (0.5 mg/50 μl), aflibercept (2.0 mg/50 μl), or bevacizumab (1.25 mg/50 μl), and a protocol-driven pro re nata re-treatment regimen at 4 to 8 weekly visits was followed up to week 100 after 4 mandated 4-weekly loading injections. Change in BCVA and percentage of patients gaining ≥ 10 letters and achieving BCVA letter score > 70 letters at 52 and 100 weeks. The analysis was adjusted for treatment effects and confirmed by sensitivity analysis. Age ≥ 75 years is a poor predictor for all 3 visual outcomes. Lower baseline BCVA predicted 10-letter gainers and higher gains in BCVA, although it is a poor predictor of achieving > 70 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters. None of the baseline OCT morphologic characteristics except ellipsoid zone (EZ) integrity influenced any visual outcomes. Both baseline CST and total macular volume showed a nonlinear relation to 10-letter gainers, with CST > 900 μm being a poor prognostic indicator. Baseline CST and macular volume did not predict mean change in BCVA or BCVA > 70 letters at 52 and 100 weeks. The sensitivity analysis conclusions after removing iCRVO were similar. At presentation, younger age, higher baseline BCVA, and a definitely intact subfoveal EZ are predictors of BCVA score > 70 letters at 100 weeks.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33610836
pii: S2468-6530(21)00058-0
doi: 10.1016/j.oret.2021.02.008
pmc: PMC8565966
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Angiogenesis Inhibitors
0
Recombinant Fusion Proteins
0
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A
0
aflibercept
15C2VL427D
Bevacizumab
2S9ZZM9Q9V
Receptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor
EC 2.7.10.1
Ranibizumab
ZL1R02VT79
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1115-1124Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Références
Am J Ophthalmol. 2005 Aug;140(2):200-6
pubmed: 15992752
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2019 Nov 1;137(11):1256-1264
pubmed: 31465100
BMC Ophthalmol. 2018 Feb 9;18(1):37
pubmed: 29426292
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2017 Jun 1;135(6):639-649
pubmed: 28492860
BMC Ophthalmol. 2019 Jan 8;19(1):11
pubmed: 30621653
Ophthalmology. 2014 Jan;121(1):202-208
pubmed: 24084497
Sci Rep. 2019 Jul 29;9(1):10952
pubmed: 31358777
Ophthalmol Retina. 2020 Jan;4(1):67-76
pubmed: 31669329
Am J Ophthalmol. 2017 Oct;182:160-167
pubmed: 28837790
Int J Epidemiol. 1999 Oct;28(5):964-74
pubmed: 10597998
Ophthalmology. 2012 May;119(5):1024-32
pubmed: 22440275
Ophthalmology. 1995 Oct;102(10):1425-33
pubmed: 9097788
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2016 Sep;233(9):1056-62
pubmed: 26854482
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2010 Feb;248(2):155-9
pubmed: 19763601
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012 Aug 24;53(9):5814-8
pubmed: 22836760
Ophthalmology. 2014 Dec;121(12):2432-42
pubmed: 25060610
Eur J Ophthalmol. 2020 Jan;30(1):8-18
pubmed: 31718271
Ophthalmology. 2013 Dec;120(12):2611-2619
pubmed: 24053995
Retina. 2014 Sep;34(9):1728-35
pubmed: 24914476
BMJ. 2011 Feb 07;342:d40
pubmed: 21300711
Ophthalmology. 2011 Feb;118(2):345-52
pubmed: 20926135