Lanabecestat: Neuroimaging results in early symptomatic Alzheimer's disease.
Alzheimer's disease
amyloid
beta‐site amyloid precursor protein‐cleaving enzyme BACE inhibitor
cerebral metabolism
cerebral perfusion
florbetapir
flortaucipir
fluorodeoxyglucose
lanabecestat
magnetic resonance imaging
mild cognitive impairment
positron emission tomography
tau
Journal
Alzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.)
ISSN: 2352-8737
Titre abrégé: Alzheimers Dement (N Y)
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101650118
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
entrez:
22
2
2021
pubmed:
23
2
2021
medline:
23
2
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Lanabecestat, a beta-site amyloid precursor protein-cleaving enzyme 1 (BACE1) inhibitor, was investigated as a potential Alzheimer's disease (AD)-modifying treatment. As previously reported, amyloid beta (Aβ) neuritic plaque burden reduction did not result in clinical benefit. Lanabecestat's effects on neuroimaging biomarkers and correlations between neuroimaging biomarkers and efficacy measures are reported. AMARANTH and DAYBREAK-ALZ were 104- and 78-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies of lanabecestat in early symptomatic AD (AMARANTH) and mild AD dementia (DAYBREAK-ALZ). Patients randomly (1:1:1) received placebo, lanabecestat 20 mg, or lanabecestat 50 mg daily (AMARANTH, n = 2218; DAYBREAK-ALZ, n = 1722). Florbetapir positron emission tomography (PET), fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET, flortaucipir PET, and volumetric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were used to measure Aβ neuritic plaque burden, cerebral metabolism, aggregated tau neurofibrillary tangles, and brain volume, respectively. Additionally, florbetapir perfusion scans were performed in DAYBREAK-ALZ. Efficacy measures included 13-item Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale, Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study Activities of Daily Living Inventory, Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes, Functional Activities Questionnaire, and Mini-Mental State Examination. These studies stopped early due to futility. Despite previously observed annualized reduction in Aβ neuritic plaque burden, there were no treatment differences in annualized change of aggregated tau neurofibrillary tangle burden (AMARANTH, n = 284; DAYBREAK-ALZ, n = 70), cerebral metabolism (AMARANTH, n = 260; DAYBREAK-ALZ, n = 38) and perfusion (DAYBREAK-ALZ, n = 213). Greater brain volume reduction (AMARANTH, n = 1697 [whole brain]; DAYBREAK-ALZ, n = 650 [whole brain]) occurred on lanabecestat compared to placebo. Higher baseline aggregated tau neurofibrillary tangle burden, lower cerebral metabolism, and lower brain volumes correlated with poorer baseline efficacy scores and greater clinical worsening. Lower baseline cerebral perfusion correlated with poorer baseline efficacy scores. Reduction in cerebral metabolism or whole brain volume correlated with clinical worsening, regardless of treatment assignment. Tau pathology and cerebral metabolism assessments showed no evidence of lanabecestat slowing pathophysiologic progression of AD. Lanabecestat exposure was associated with brain volume reductions. Correlations between imaging measures and cognitive assessments may aid future study design.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33614894
doi: 10.1002/trc2.12123
pii: TRC212123
pmc: PMC7882543
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e12123Informations de copyright
© 2021 The Authors. Alzheimer's & Dementia: Translational Research & Clinical Interventions published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Alzheimer's Association.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Drs Zimmer, Shcherbinin, Devous, Selzler, Wessels, Downing, Fleisher, Otero Svaldi, and Sims; Ms Bragg; Messrs Landry and Andersen reported being full‐time employees and minor shareholders of Eli Lilly and Company. Drs Shering and Mullen reported being employees of AstraZeneca, which holds the intellectual property for lanabecestat, and being minor shareholders of AstraZeneca. Dr Mullen is a former AstraZeneca employee.
Références
J Psychiatr Res. 1975 Nov;12(3):189-98
pubmed: 1202204
J Gerontol. 1982 May;37(3):323-9
pubmed: 7069156
Mol Neurodegener. 2019 Jun 7;14(1):21
pubmed: 31174557
Alzheimers Dement. 2019 Jan;15(1):106-152
pubmed: 30321505
Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 1997;11 Suppl 2:S33-9
pubmed: 9236950
Alzheimers Dement. 2018 Dec;14(12):1565-1571
pubmed: 30006100
JAMA. 2013 Nov 27;310(20):2191-4
pubmed: 24141714
J Alzheimers Dis. 2016;50(4):1109-23
pubmed: 26890753
Front Aging Neurosci. 2018 Jul 26;10:229
pubmed: 30093858
JAMA Neurol. 2020 Feb 1;77(2):199-209
pubmed: 31764959
Neurology. 2016 Aug 2;87(5):539-47
pubmed: 27371494
Alzheimers Res Ther. 2020 May 14;12(1):58
pubmed: 32410694
Brain. 2019 Jun 1;142(6):1723-1735
pubmed: 31009046
N Engl J Med. 2018 May 3;378(18):1691-1703
pubmed: 29719179
Nat Rev Neurol. 2011 Mar;7(3):137-52
pubmed: 21304480
Alzheimers Res Ther. 2020 May 26;12(1):63
pubmed: 32456694
Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 1997;11 Suppl 2:S13-21
pubmed: 9236948
Sci Transl Med. 2018 Sep 19;10(459):
pubmed: 30232227
Br J Psychiatry. 1982 Jun;140:566-72
pubmed: 7104545
Am J Psychiatry. 1984 Nov;141(11):1356-64
pubmed: 6496779
Biol Psychiatry. 2018 Oct 1;84(7):478-487
pubmed: 29945719
N Engl J Med. 2019 Apr 11;380(15):1408-1420
pubmed: 30970186
Lancet Neurol. 2014 Mar;13(3):319-29
pubmed: 24556009
Lancet Neurol. 2010 Jan;9(1):119-28
pubmed: 20083042