Hip Adductor Longus Tendon Origin Anatomy Is Consistent and May Inform Surgical Reattachment.


Journal

Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation
ISSN: 2666-061X
Titre abrégé: Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101765256

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Feb 2021
Historique:
received: 22 06 2020
accepted: 19 09 2020
entrez: 22 2 2021
pubmed: 23 2 2021
medline: 23 2 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

To define the topographic anatomy of the footprint of the adductor longus origin on the pubis and its underlying bony morphology to better inform surgical repair of adductor longus tendon injuries. Five cadaveric pelvis specimens were dissected, making 10 adductor footprints available for analysis. The adductor longus tendon origin was isolated and the surrounding tissue debrided. The circumference of the tendinous attachment to the pubic crest was marked before excising the tendon and fibrocartilage enthesis from the pubis. Radiopaque paint was prepared by mixing 30 mL of all-purpose acrylic paint (Anita's no. 11150 Island Blue; Rust-Oleum Corp, Vernon Hills, IL) with 15g of E-Z-HD 98% w/w barium sulfate (Bracco Diagnostics Inc., Anjou Quebec, Canada) and applied to the marked footprint. The specimens underwent a 1.0-mm slice computed tomographic scan with 3-dimensional reconstructions. Synapse PACS (FujiFilm, Valhalla, NY) software for measurements of the tendon footprint and underlying bone. Average age and weight of the specimens at the time of death was 37 years and 204.6 ± 48.7 lbs, respectively. The width and length of the tendon origin was 12.0 ± 1.1 mm and 10.9 ± 1.1 mm, respectively. The distance of the center of the footprint from the center of the pubic tubercle was 8.5 ± 1.4 mm lateral and 12.2 ± 0.4 mm caudal. The osseous thickness underlying the footprint was 18.7 ± 3.7 mm at an angle of 34.5 ± 1.5° in relation to the sagittal plane. The correlation between specimen body weight and the thickness of the bone underlying the footprint was strongly positive (r = 0.92). We found that there is a consistent angle from the center of the adductor longus tendon footprint to the point of maximal underlying bony thickness, as well as a positive correlation between body mass index and osseous thickness, which may inform anatomic reattachment of this tendon. Our findings will assist surgeons in identifying the footprint of the adductor longus tendon and safely perform anatomic repair of adductor longus tendon avulsions.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33615269
doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2020.09.015
pii: S2666-061X(20)30143-7
pmc: PMC7879210
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e227-e232

Informations de copyright

© 2020 by the Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Références

Am J Sports Med. 2007 Jun;35(6):996-9
pubmed: 17307894
Br J Sports Med. 2009 Dec;43(13):1036-40
pubmed: 19945984
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 Mar 1;91 Suppl 2 Pt 1:89-100
pubmed: 19255202
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Feb;90(2):249-55
pubmed: 18245582
Sports Health. 2016 Jul;8(4):313-23
pubmed: 27302153
Am J Sports Med. 2007 Mar;35(3):467-74
pubmed: 17267768
Br J Sports Med. 2015 Jun;49(12):768-74
pubmed: 26031643
Am J Sports Med. 2009 Jul;37(7):1394-9
pubmed: 19329786
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2013 Sep;21(9):558-70
pubmed: 23996987
Bone Joint J. 2015 Nov;97-B(11):1488-92
pubmed: 26530650
Radiology. 2008 Jun;247(3):797-807
pubmed: 18487535
Br J Sports Med. 2019 Feb;53(3):158-164
pubmed: 30006458
Hernia. 2010 Feb;14(1):27-33
pubmed: 20063110
Arthroscopy. 2019 Aug;35(8):2358-2364
pubmed: 31395170
Radiographics. 2008 Sep-Oct;28(5):1415-38
pubmed: 18794316
Skeletal Radiol. 2004 Aug;33(8):451-7
pubmed: 15224172
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016 Dec;24(12):3927-3933
pubmed: 26055254
Foot Ankle Int. 2013 Apr;34(4):582-6
pubmed: 23559616
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017 Dec;25(12):3969-3977
pubmed: 28866812
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2007 Oct;127(8):613-5
pubmed: 17505839
Am J Sports Med. 2004 Jan-Feb;32(1):243-5
pubmed: 14754751
Arthroscopy. 2015 Aug;31(8):1518-21
pubmed: 25896274
Clin Sports Med. 2013 Jul;32(3):427-47
pubmed: 23773876
Br J Sports Med. 2012 Sep;46(12):871-6
pubmed: 22006933
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2018 Feb;28(2):667-676
pubmed: 28649700
Clin J Sport Med. 2008 Mar;18(2):167-9
pubmed: 18332694
Orthop J Sports Med. 2018 Jul 17;6(7):2325967118784898
pubmed: 30038918
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1998;6(2):134-7
pubmed: 9604200
Br J Sports Med. 2015 Jun;49(12):798-802
pubmed: 26031645

Auteurs

Michael A Perrone (MA)

Cedars Sinai Kerlan-Jobe Orthopaedic Institute, Los Angeles, California, U.S.A.

Ali Noorzad (A)

Cedars Sinai Department of Orthopaedics, Los Angeles, California, U.S.A.

Mathew Hamula (M)

Cedars Sinai Kerlan-Jobe Orthopaedic Institute, Los Angeles, California, U.S.A.

Melodie Metzger (M)

Metzger Biomechanics Laboratory at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, U.S.A.

Michael Banffy (M)

Cedars Sinai Kerlan-Jobe Orthopaedic Institute, Los Angeles, California, U.S.A.

Michael Gerhardt (M)

Cedars Sinai Kerlan-Jobe Orthopaedic Institute, Los Angeles, California, U.S.A.
Santa Monica Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine Group, Los Angeles, California, U.S.A.

Classifications MeSH