Psychosocial considerations in the assessment of hand transplant candidates: A single-center experience and brief literature review.
depression
quality of life
vascular composite allograft
Journal
Clinical transplantation
ISSN: 1399-0012
Titre abrégé: Clin Transplant
Pays: Denmark
ID NLM: 8710240
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 2021
04 2021
Historique:
revised:
27
01
2021
received:
31
08
2020
accepted:
31
01
2021
pubmed:
23
2
2021
medline:
3
7
2021
entrez:
22
2
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Vascularized composite allograft, including hand transplantation (HT), has gained wider usage as a reconstructive treatment over the past 30 years. HT recipients face unique psychosocial challenges compared to their solid organ and/or bone marrow transplant counterparts. Accordingly, the psychosocial evaluation among HT candidates continues to evolve, leaving a lack of consensus as to the critical psychosocial domains and psychometric testing instruments to help evaluate individuals considering HT. The present manuscript describes the psychosocial evaluation process within the Duke HT program, which been contacted by 80 potential candidates since 2014. The Duke HT evaluation process incorporates a comprehensive psychosocial assessment within domains including personality, cognitive function, mood, behavioral adherence, social support, and substance use history, among others. Our experience underscores the potential utility of collecting thorough psychosocial evaluations, supplemented by psychometric test data, to comprehensively assess potential HT candidates.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e14268Informations de copyright
© 2021 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Références
Cendales LC, Rahmel A, Pruett TL. Allocation of vascularized composite allografts: what is it? Transplantation. 2012;93(11):1086-1087.
Cendales L, Granger D, Henry M, et al. Implementation of vascularized composite allografts in the United States: recommendations from the ASTS VCA Ad Hoc Committee and the Executive Committee. Am J Transplant. 2011;11(1):13-17.
Dubernard JM, Owen E, Lefrancois N, et al. First human hand transplantation. Case report. Transpl Int. 2000;13(Suppl 1):S521-524.
Caplan AL, Kimberly LL, Parent B, Sosin M, Rodriguez ED. The ethics of penile transplantation: preliminary recommendations. Transplantation. 2017;101(6):1200-1205.
Caplan A. Bioethics of organ transplantation. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2014;4(3).
Caplan AL. Ensuring the future of uterine transplantation. Fertil Steril. 2013;99(3):682-683.
Dew MA, DiMartini AF, Dobbels F, et al. The 2018 ISHLT/APM/AST/ICCAC/STSW recommendations for the psychosocial evaluation of adult cardiothoracic transplant candidates and candidates for long-term mechanical circulatory support. Psychosomatics. 2018;59(5):415-440.
Hong S, Rybicki L, Corrigan D, et al. Psychosocial Assessment of Candidates for Transplant (PACT) as a tool for psychological and social evaluation of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation recipients. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2019;54(9):1443-1452.
Jowsey-Gregoire SG, Kumnig M, Morelon E, Moreno E, Petruzzo P, Seulin C. The chauvet 2014 meeting report: psychiatric and psychosocial evaluation and outcomes of upper extremity grafted patients. Transplantation. 2016;100(7):1453-1459.
Del Priore G, Saso S, Meslin EM, et al. Uterine transplantation-a real possibility? The Indianapolis consensus. Hum Reprod. 2013;28(2):288-291.
Shanmugarajah K, Hettiaratchy S, Clarke A, Butler PE. Clinical outcomes of facial transplantation: a review. Int J Surg. 2011;9(8):600-607.
Mishkin AD, Shapiro PA, Reshef R, Lopez-Pintado S, Mapara MY. Standardized semi-structured psychosocial evaluation before hematopoietic stem cell transplantation predicts patient adherence to post-transplant regimen. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2019;25(11):2222-2227.
Kennedy VE, Muffly LS. Assessment of older adult candidates for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation: updates and remaining questions. Expert Rev Hematol. 2019;12(2):99-106.
Block AR, Sarwer DB. Presurgical Psychological Screening: Understanding Patient, Improving Outcomes. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2013.
Butler PE, Hettiaratchy S, Clarke A. Facial transplantation: a new gold standard in facial reconstruction? J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2006;59(3):211-212.
Butler PE, Clarke A, Ashcroft RE. Face transplantation: when and for whom? Am J Bioeth. 2004;4(3):16-17.discussion W23-31.
Myaskovsky L, Jesse MT, Kuntz K, et al. Report from the American society of transplantation psychosocial community of practice adherence task force: real-world options for promoting adherence in adult recipients. Clin Transplant. 2018;32(9):e13353.
Ladin K, Daniels A, Osani M, Bannuru RR. Is social support associated with post-transplant medication adherence and outcomes? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Transplant Rev (Orlando). 2018;32(1):16-28.
Sandhu GS, Khattak M, Woodward RS, et al. Impact of substance abuse on access to renal transplantation. Transplantation. 2011;91(1):86-93.
Surman OS, Cosimi AB, DiMartini A. Psychiatric care of patients undergoing organ transplantation. Transplantation. 2009;87(12):1753-1761.
Sharafeldin N, Bosworth A, Patel SK, et al. Cognitive functioning after hematopoietic cell transplantation for hematologic malignancy: results from a prospective longitudinal study. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36(5):463-475.
Maldonado JR, Sher Y, Lolak S, et al. The stanford integrated psychosocial assessment for transplantation: A prospective study of medical and psychosocial outcomes. Psychosom Med. 2015;77(9):1018-1030.
Jowsey-Gregoire S, Kumnig M. Standardizing psychosocial assessment for vascularized composite allotransplantation. Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 2016;21(5):530-535.
Franklin JM, Gopalakrishnan C, Krumme AA, et al. The relative benefits of claims and electronic health record data for predicting medication adherence trajectory. Am Heart J. 2018;197:153-162.
Taber DJ, Fleming JN, Fominaya CE, et al. The impact of health care appointment non-adherence on graft outcomes in kidney transplantation. Am J Nephrol. 2017;45(1):91-98.
Dew MA, DiMartini AF, Steel J, et al. Meta-analysis of risk for relapse to substance use after transplantation of the liver or other solid organs. Liver Transpl. 2008;14(2):159-172.
Chuncharunee L, Yamashiki N, Thakkinstian A, Sobhonslidsuk A. Alcohol relapse and its predictors after liver transplantation for alcoholic liver disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Gastroenterol. 2019;19(1):150.
Maldonado JR. why it is important to consider social support when assessing organ transplant candidates? Am J Bioeth. 2019;19(11):1-8.
Bui QM, Allen LA, LeMond L, Brambatti M, Adler E. Psychosocial evaluation of candidates for heart transplant and ventricular assist devices: beyond the current consensus. Circ Heart Fail. 2019;12(7):e006058.
Fineberg SK, West A, Na PJ, et al. Utility of pretransplant psychological measures to predict posttransplant outcomes in liver transplant patients: a systematic review. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2016;40:4-11.
Smith PJ, Blumenthal JA, Hoffman BM, Davis RD, Palmer SM. Postoperative cognitive dysfunction and mortality following lung transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2018;18(3):696-703.
Hoogland AI, Nelson AM, Small BJ, et al. The role of age in neurocognitive functioning among adult allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant recipients. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2017;23(11):1974-1979.
Mahanna-Gabrielli E, Schenning KJ, Eriksson LI, et al. State of the clinical science of perioperative brain health: report from the American Society of Anesthesiologists Brain Health Initiative Summit 2018. Br J Anaesth. 2019;123(4):464-478.
Dolansky MA, Hawkins MA, Schaefer JT, et al. Association between poorer cognitive function and reduced objectively monitored medication adherence in patients with heart failure. Circ Heart Fail. 2016;9(12):1-9.
Campbell NL, Boustani MA, Skopelja EN, Gao S, Unverzagt FW, Murray MD. Medication adherence in older adults with cognitive impairment: a systematic evidence-based review. Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2012;10(3):165-177.
Cho MH, Shin DW, Chang SA, et al. Association between cognitive impairment and poor antihypertensive medication adherence in elderly hypertensive patients without dementia. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):11688.
Trahan E, Pepin M, Hopps S. Impaired awareness of deficits and treatment adherence among people with traumatic brain injury or spinal cord injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2006;21(3):226-235.
Wood RL, Worthington A. Neurobehavioral abnormalities associated with executive dysfunction after traumatic brain injury. Front Behav Neurosci. 2017;11:195.
Gray-Burrows K, Taylor N, O’Connor D, Sutherland E, Stoet G, Conner M. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the executive function-health behaviour relationship. Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine. 2019;7(1):253-268.
Smith PJ, Byrd R, Lusby M, Clausen E, Snyder LD. Depressive symptoms, exercise capacity, and clinical outcomes after lung transplantation. Psychosom Med. 2018;80(4):403-409.
Rosenberger EM, Dew MA, Crone C, DiMartini AF. Psychiatric disorders as risk factors for adverse medical outcomes after solid organ transplantation. Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 2012;17(2):188-192.
Davydow DS, Lease ED, Reyes JD. Posttraumatic stress disorder in organ transplant recipients: a systematic review. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2015;37(5):387-398.
Stonerock GL, Smith PJ, Hoffman BM, Ingle KK, Saulino CK, Blumenthal JA. Social desirability response bias in transplant candidates' self-report of psychological variables. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2017;36(4S):S208.
Morey LC. The personality assessment inventory. In: Archer RP, Smith SR, eds. Personality Assessment, 2nd edn. New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group; 2014:181-228.
Costa PT Jr, McCrae RR. The revised NEO personality inventory (NEO-PI-R). In: Boyle GJ, Matthews G, Saklofske DH, eds. The SAGE Handbook of Personality Theory and Assessment, Vol 2: Personality Measurement and Testing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc; 2008:179-198.
Blake DD, Weathers FW, Nagy LM, et al. The development of a Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale. J Trauma Stress. 1995;8(1):75-90.
Gray MJ, Litz BT, Hsu JL, Lombardo TW. Psychometric properties of the life events checklist. Assessment. 2004;11(4):330-341.
Gigliotti E, Samuels WE. Tests of revisions to the norbeck social support questionnaire. SAGE Open Med. 2020;8:2050312120911293.
Beck AT, Steer RA, Brown GK. Manual for the Beck Depression Inventory-II. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation; 1996.
Smith PJ, Snyder LD, Palmer SM, et al. Depression, social support, and clinical outcomes following lung transplantation: a single-center cohort study. Transpl Int. 2018;31(5):495-502.
Kumnig M, Jowsey-Gregoire S. Psychological and psychosocial aspects of limb transplantation. In: Sher Y, Maldonado JR, eds. Psychosocial Care of End-Stage Organ Disease and Transplant Patients. Cham, Switzerland: Springer; 2019:365-376.
Wilkinson GS, Robertson GJ. WRAT 4: Wide Range Achievement Test. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources; 2006.
McCrimmon AW, Smith AD. Review of wechsler abbreviated scale of intelligence, second edition (WASI-II). J Psychoed Ass. 2013;31(3):337-341.
Randolph C, Tierney MC, Mohr E, Chase TN. The repeatable battery for the assessment of neuropsychological status (RBANS): preliminary clinical validity. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1998;20(3):310-319.
Smith PJ, Rivelli S, Waters A, et al. Neurocognitive changes after lung transplantation. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2014;11(10):1520-1527.