Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in pregnancy for prevention of mother to child transmission of hepatitis B in a rural setting on the Thailand-Myanmar border: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Adult
Antiviral Agents
/ therapeutic use
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Female
Hepatitis B
/ prevention & control
Humans
Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical
/ prevention & control
Myanmar
Pregnancy
Pregnancy Complications, Infectious
/ virology
Reproducibility of Results
Rural Population
Tenofovir
/ therapeutic use
Thailand
Viral Load
Young Adult
Antiviral therapy
Cost-effectiveness
Perinatal infection
Journal
BMC pregnancy and childbirth
ISSN: 1471-2393
Titre abrégé: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100967799
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
22 Feb 2021
22 Feb 2021
Historique:
received:
31
08
2020
accepted:
02
02
2021
entrez:
23
2
2021
pubmed:
24
2
2021
medline:
18
5
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) is transmitted from mother to child which can be prevented via birth dose vaccine combined with three follow up hepatitis B vaccines, hepatitis B immunoglobulins (HBIG), and maternal antiviral treatment with Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate (TDF). This study evaluates the cost effectiveness of six strategies to prevent perinatal HBV transmission in a resource limited setting (RLS) on the Thailand-Myanmar border. The cost effectiveness of six strategies was tested by a decision tree model in R. All strategies included birth and follow up vaccinations and compared cost per infection averted against two willingness to pay thresholds: one-half and one gross domestic product (GDP) per capita. Strategies were: 1) Vaccine only, 2) HBIG after rapid diagnostic test (RDT): infants born to HBsAg+ are given HBIG, 3) TDF after RDT: HBsAg+ women are given TDF, 4) TDF after HBeAg test: HBeAg+ women are given TDF, 5) TDF after high HBV DNA: women with HBV DNA > 200,000 are given TDF, 6) HBIG & TDF after high HBV DNA: women with HBV DNA > 200,000 are given TDF and their infants are given HBIG. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted on the cost-effective strategies. Vaccine only was the least costly option with TDF after HBeAg test strategy as the only cost-effective alternative. TDF after HBeAg test had an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of US$1062; which would not be considered cost-effective with the lower threshold of one-half GDP per capita. The one-way sensitivity analysis demonstrated that the results were reasonably robust to changes in single parameter values. The PSA showed that TDF after HBeAg test had an 84% likelihood of being cost effective at a willingness to pay threshold of one GDP per capita per infection averted. We found that TDF after HBeAg test has the potential to be cost-effective if TDF proves effective locally to prevent perinatal HBV transmission. The cost of TDF treatment and reliability of the RDT could be barriers to implementing this strategy. While TDF after RDT may be a more feasible strategy to implement in RLS, TDF after HBeAg test is a less costly option.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) is transmitted from mother to child which can be prevented via birth dose vaccine combined with three follow up hepatitis B vaccines, hepatitis B immunoglobulins (HBIG), and maternal antiviral treatment with Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate (TDF). This study evaluates the cost effectiveness of six strategies to prevent perinatal HBV transmission in a resource limited setting (RLS) on the Thailand-Myanmar border.
METHODS
METHODS
The cost effectiveness of six strategies was tested by a decision tree model in R. All strategies included birth and follow up vaccinations and compared cost per infection averted against two willingness to pay thresholds: one-half and one gross domestic product (GDP) per capita. Strategies were: 1) Vaccine only, 2) HBIG after rapid diagnostic test (RDT): infants born to HBsAg+ are given HBIG, 3) TDF after RDT: HBsAg+ women are given TDF, 4) TDF after HBeAg test: HBeAg+ women are given TDF, 5) TDF after high HBV DNA: women with HBV DNA > 200,000 are given TDF, 6) HBIG & TDF after high HBV DNA: women with HBV DNA > 200,000 are given TDF and their infants are given HBIG. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted on the cost-effective strategies.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Vaccine only was the least costly option with TDF after HBeAg test strategy as the only cost-effective alternative. TDF after HBeAg test had an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of US$1062; which would not be considered cost-effective with the lower threshold of one-half GDP per capita. The one-way sensitivity analysis demonstrated that the results were reasonably robust to changes in single parameter values. The PSA showed that TDF after HBeAg test had an 84% likelihood of being cost effective at a willingness to pay threshold of one GDP per capita per infection averted.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
We found that TDF after HBeAg test has the potential to be cost-effective if TDF proves effective locally to prevent perinatal HBV transmission. The cost of TDF treatment and reliability of the RDT could be barriers to implementing this strategy. While TDF after RDT may be a more feasible strategy to implement in RLS, TDF after HBeAg test is a less costly option.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33618698
doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-03612-z
pii: 10.1186/s12884-021-03612-z
pmc: PMC7901182
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antiviral Agents
0
Tenofovir
99YXE507IL
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
157Subventions
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
ID : 210599/Z/18/Z
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
ID : 106698/Z/14/Z
Pays : United Kingdom
Références
Int J Epidemiol. 2018 Oct 1;47(5):1529-1537
pubmed: 29757383
Korean J Intern Med. 2021 Jan;36(1):76-85
pubmed: 31878771
Dig Dis Sci. 2012 Sep;57(9):2423-9
pubmed: 22543886
N Engl J Med. 1976 Apr 1;294(14):746-9
pubmed: 943694
Clin Infect Dis. 2018 Jul 18;67(3):464-471
pubmed: 29471452
J Pregnancy. 2019 Feb 25;2019:8435019
pubmed: 30931155
World J Gastroenterol. 2003 Jul;9(7):1501-3
pubmed: 12854150
BMC Infect Dis. 2013 Apr 18;13:181
pubmed: 23597411
J Infect Dev Ctries. 2016 Apr 28;10(4):384-8
pubmed: 27131000
Liver Int. 2020 Oct;40(10):2377-2384
pubmed: 32304160
J Clin Microbiol. 1987 Feb;25(2):432-3
pubmed: 3818932
BMC Public Health. 2019 Jun 26;19(1):829
pubmed: 31242901
Clin Ther. 2018 Aug;40(8):1255-1267
pubmed: 29983265
J Viral Hepat. 2008 Jan;15(1):37-41
pubmed: 18088243
Vaccine. 2018 Jan 2;36(1):6-14
pubmed: 29174317
Pediatrics. 1985 Nov;76(5):713-8
pubmed: 3903646
Am J Epidemiol. 1977 Feb;105(2):94-8
pubmed: 835566
J Med Virol. 1987 Feb;21(2):137-45
pubmed: 3819704
Emerg Microbes Infect. 2015 May;4(5):e30
pubmed: 26060603
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020 May;33(9):1526-1531
pubmed: 30407090
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2019 Dec 07;6(12):ofz518
pubmed: 31890723
N Engl J Med. 2018 Mar 08;378(10):911-923
pubmed: 29514030
Vaccine. 2008 May 23;26(22):2753-61
pubmed: 18436354
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012 May;10(5):452-9
pubmed: 22079509
Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 Jan;21(1):70-84
pubmed: 32805200
J Hepatol. 2008 Feb;48(2):335-52
pubmed: 18096267
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Aug;96(33):e7766
pubmed: 28816955
Lancet. 1984 Apr 28;1(8383):921-6
pubmed: 6143868
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2014 May;39(10):1225-34
pubmed: 24666381
N Engl J Med. 2016 Jun 16;374(24):2324-34
pubmed: 27305192
BMC Infect Dis. 2017 Aug 9;17(1):552
pubmed: 28793866
Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Mar;63(1):175-192
pubmed: 31895116
BMJ Open. 2020 Sep 13;10(9):e038123
pubmed: 32928858
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Nov;1(3):248-255
pubmed: 28404097
Antivir Ther. 2015;20(7):681-7
pubmed: 26215771
Lancet. 1983 Nov 12;2(8359):1099-102
pubmed: 6138642
BMC Infect Dis. 2016 Aug 09;16:393
pubmed: 27506549
J Hepatol. 2003 Feb;38(2):215-22
pubmed: 12547411
Hepatol Int. 2008 Sep;2(3):370-5
pubmed: 19669267
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2006 Jul;50(7):2471-7
pubmed: 16801428
J Clin Pathol. 2004 Feb;57(2):141-5
pubmed: 14747437
PeerJ. 2016 Mar 24;4:e1709
pubmed: 27042389
Hepatology. 2016 May;63(5):1471-80
pubmed: 26509655
Infect Drug Resist. 2019 Nov 07;12:3475-3484
pubmed: 31807036