Eliminating Plasmodium falciparum malaria: results from tailoring active case detection approaches to remote populations in forested border areas in north-eastern Cambodia.
Case detection
Community health worker
Early diagnosis and treatment
Forest malaria
Greater mekong subregion
Malaria elimination
Mobile and migrant populations
Mobile malaria worker
Plasmodium falciparum
Regional artemisinin initiative
Journal
Malaria journal
ISSN: 1475-2875
Titre abrégé: Malar J
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101139802
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
22 Feb 2021
22 Feb 2021
Historique:
received:
12
10
2020
accepted:
04
02
2021
entrez:
23
2
2021
pubmed:
24
2
2021
medline:
14
8
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Remaining Plasmodium falciparum cases in Cambodia are concentrated in forested border areas and in remote populations who are hard to reach through passive case detection. A key approach to reach these populations is active case detection by mobile malaria workers (MMWs). However, this is operationally challenging because of changing movement patterns of the target population moving into less accessible areas. From January 2018 to December 2020, a tailored package of active case detection approaches was implemented in forested border areas of three provinces in north-eastern Cambodia to reach remote populations and support the elimination of falciparum malaria. Key elements of this project were to tailor approaches to local populations, use responsive monitoring systems, maintain operational flexibility, build strong relationships with local communities, and implement close supervision practices. MMWs were recruited from local communities. Proactive case detection approaches included mobile malaria posts positioned at frequented locations around and within forests, and locally informed outreach activities targeting more remote locations. Reactive case detection was conducted among co-travellers of confirmed cases. Testing for malaria was conducted independent of fever symptoms. Routine monitoring of programmatic data informed tactical adaptations, while supervision exercises ensured service quality. Despite operational challenges, service delivery sites were able to maintain consistently high testing rates throughout the implementation period, with each of 45 sites testing a monthly average of 64 (SD 6) people in 2020. In 2020, project MMWs detected only 32 P. falciparum cases. Over the project period, the P. falciparum/P. vivax ratio steadily inversed. Including data from neighbouring health centres and village malaria workers, 45% (80,988/180,732) of all people tested and 39% (1280/3243) of P. falciparum cases detected in the area can be attributed to project MMWs. Remaining challenges of the last elimination phase include maintaining intensified elimination efforts, addressing the issue of detecting low parasitaemia cases and shifting focus to P. vivax malaria. Reaching remote populations through active case detection should remain a key strategy to eliminate P. falciparum malaria. This case study presented a successful approach combining tailored proactive and reactive strategies that could be transferred to similar settings in other areas of the Greater Mekong Subregion.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Remaining Plasmodium falciparum cases in Cambodia are concentrated in forested border areas and in remote populations who are hard to reach through passive case detection. A key approach to reach these populations is active case detection by mobile malaria workers (MMWs). However, this is operationally challenging because of changing movement patterns of the target population moving into less accessible areas. From January 2018 to December 2020, a tailored package of active case detection approaches was implemented in forested border areas of three provinces in north-eastern Cambodia to reach remote populations and support the elimination of falciparum malaria.
METHODS
METHODS
Key elements of this project were to tailor approaches to local populations, use responsive monitoring systems, maintain operational flexibility, build strong relationships with local communities, and implement close supervision practices. MMWs were recruited from local communities. Proactive case detection approaches included mobile malaria posts positioned at frequented locations around and within forests, and locally informed outreach activities targeting more remote locations. Reactive case detection was conducted among co-travellers of confirmed cases. Testing for malaria was conducted independent of fever symptoms. Routine monitoring of programmatic data informed tactical adaptations, while supervision exercises ensured service quality.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Despite operational challenges, service delivery sites were able to maintain consistently high testing rates throughout the implementation period, with each of 45 sites testing a monthly average of 64 (SD 6) people in 2020. In 2020, project MMWs detected only 32 P. falciparum cases. Over the project period, the P. falciparum/P. vivax ratio steadily inversed. Including data from neighbouring health centres and village malaria workers, 45% (80,988/180,732) of all people tested and 39% (1280/3243) of P. falciparum cases detected in the area can be attributed to project MMWs. Remaining challenges of the last elimination phase include maintaining intensified elimination efforts, addressing the issue of detecting low parasitaemia cases and shifting focus to P. vivax malaria.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Reaching remote populations through active case detection should remain a key strategy to eliminate P. falciparum malaria. This case study presented a successful approach combining tailored proactive and reactive strategies that could be transferred to similar settings in other areas of the Greater Mekong Subregion.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33618718
doi: 10.1186/s12936-021-03622-4
pii: 10.1186/s12936-021-03622-4
pmc: PMC7898252
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
108Références
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 09;10(9):e0124300
pubmed: 26352262
Malar J. 2016 Mar 01;15:132
pubmed: 26931488
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 May 8;17(1):335
pubmed: 28482899
PLoS One. 2014 Dec 26;9(12):e116143
pubmed: 25541721
Malar J. 2015 Jun 20;14:252
pubmed: 26088924
Malar J. 2016 Aug 26;15(1):434
pubmed: 27562347
Lancet. 2018 May 12;391(10133):1916-1926
pubmed: 29703425
Malar J. 2017 Jan 31;16(1):56
pubmed: 28143518
Malar J. 2021 Jan 20;20(1):51
pubmed: 33472630
Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2009 Jul;40(4):674-91
pubmed: 19842400
Malar J. 2017 Feb 17;16(1):81
pubmed: 28212641
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2016 Dec 28;95(6 Suppl):97-107
pubmed: 27708187
Malar J. 2018 Jan 15;17(1):27
pubmed: 29334956
Malar J. 2013 Nov 09;12:405
pubmed: 24206649
Clin Infect Dis. 2018 Jan 6;66(2):296-298
pubmed: 29020325
Parasit Vectors. 2014 Jun 09;7:265
pubmed: 24912923
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2019 May;100(5):1170-1178
pubmed: 30860021
Clin Infect Dis. 2017 Oct 30;65(10):1769-1770
pubmed: 29020315
Malar J. 2020 Apr 15;19(1):151
pubmed: 32293452