Clinical and molecular heterogeneity of pineal parenchymal tumors: a consensus study.
Consensus
DNA methylation profiling
Molecular groups
Pineal parenchymal tumors of intermediate differentiation
Pineoblastoma
Risk-stratification
Journal
Acta neuropathologica
ISSN: 1432-0533
Titre abrégé: Acta Neuropathol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 0412041
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 2021
05 2021
Historique:
received:
28
01
2021
accepted:
09
02
2021
revised:
08
02
2021
pubmed:
24
2
2021
medline:
17
11
2021
entrez:
23
2
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Recent genomic studies have shed light on the biology and inter-tumoral heterogeneity underlying pineal parenchymal tumors, in particular pineoblastomas (PBs) and pineal parenchymal tumors of intermediate differentiation (PPTIDs). Previous reports, however, had modest sample sizes and lacked the power to integrate molecular and clinical findings. The different proposed molecular group structures also highlighted a need to reach consensus on a robust and relevant classification system. We performed a meta-analysis on 221 patients with molecularly characterized PBs and PPTIDs. DNA methylation profiles were analyzed through complementary bioinformatic approaches and molecular subgrouping was harmonized. Demographic, clinical, and genomic features of patients and samples from these pineal tumor groups were annotated. Four clinically and biologically relevant consensus PB groups were defined: PB-miRNA1 (n = 96), PB-miRNA2 (n = 23), PB-MYC/FOXR2 (n = 34), and PB-RB1 (n = 25). A final molecularly distinct group, designated PPTID (n = 43), comprised histological PPTID and PBs. Genomic and transcriptomic profiling allowed the characterization of oncogenic drivers for individual tumor groups, specifically, alterations in the microRNA processing pathway in PB-miRNA1/2, MYC amplification and FOXR2 overexpression in PB-MYC/FOXR2, RB1 alteration in PB-RB1, and KBTBD4 insertion in PPTID. Age at diagnosis, sex predilection, and metastatic status varied significantly among tumor groups. While patients with PB-miRNA2 and PPTID had superior outcome, survival was intermediate for patients with PB-miRNA1, and dismal for those with PB-MYC/FOXR2 or PB-RB1. Reduced-dose CSI was adequate for patients with average-risk, PB-miRNA1/2 disease. We systematically interrogated the clinical and molecular heterogeneity within pineal parenchymal tumors and proposed a consensus nomenclature for disease groups, laying the groundwork for future studies as well as routine use in tumor diagnostic classification and clinical trial stratification.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33619588
doi: 10.1007/s00401-021-02284-5
pii: 10.1007/s00401-021-02284-5
pmc: PMC9302019
mid: NIHMS1819343
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
771-785Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P30 CA008748
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P30 CA021765
Pays : United States
Organisme : Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute
ID : CA008748
Organisme : Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute
ID : CA021765
Références
Brain Pathol. 2000 Jan;10(1):49-60
pubmed: 10668895
Neuro Oncol. 2020 May 15;22(5):613-624
pubmed: 31889194
J Clin Oncol. 2005 Aug 20;23(24):5511-9
pubmed: 16110011
Bioinformatics. 2014 May 15;30(10):1363-9
pubmed: 24478339
J Clin Oncol. 1999 Mar;17(3):832-45
pubmed: 10071274
BMC Bioinformatics. 2010 Jul 02;11:367
pubmed: 20598126
Oncogene. 2018 May;37(21):2850-2862
pubmed: 29511348
Nature. 2018 Mar 22;555(7697):469-474
pubmed: 29539639
J Med Genet. 2012 Jul;49(7):417-9
pubmed: 22717647
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2020 Jun;67(6):e28252
pubmed: 32187454
J Clin Oncol. 2003 Jun 1;21(11):2187-91
pubmed: 12775745
Clin Cancer Res. 2014 Feb 15;20(4):912-25
pubmed: 24297863
JAMA. 1997 Oct 15;278(15):1262-7
pubmed: 9333268
Acta Neuropathol. 2020 Feb;139(2):259-271
pubmed: 31802236
Acta Neuropathol. 2020 Apr;139(4):689-701
pubmed: 30953130
Acta Neuropathol. 2016 Jun;131(6):903-10
pubmed: 26671409
Neuro Oncol. 2017 Jan;19(1):78-88
pubmed: 27282397
Genome Biol. 2011;12(4):R41
pubmed: 21527027
Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2007 Feb;46(2):118-29
pubmed: 17099872
Nature. 2019 Dec;576(7786):274-280
pubmed: 31802000
Cancer. 2012 Jan 1;118(1):173-9
pubmed: 21717450
Radiother Oncol. 2016 Nov;121(2):204-208
pubmed: 27865543
Neuro Oncol. 2017 Apr 1;19(4):576-585
pubmed: 28011926
Nat Commun. 2018 Jul 20;9(1):2868
pubmed: 30030436
Bioinformatics. 2010 Jun 15;26(12):1572-3
pubmed: 20427518
Acta Neuropathol. 2019 May;137(5):851-854
pubmed: 30877433
Cell Rep. 2016 Jul 12;16(2):487-497
pubmed: 27346356
Eur J Cancer. 2006 May;42(8):1120-8
pubmed: 16632346
J Biol Chem. 2013 Mar 15;288(11):7803-7814
pubmed: 23349464
Acta Neuropathol. 2020 Feb;139(2):223-241
pubmed: 31820118
Nat Commun. 2020 Apr 14;11(1):1825
pubmed: 32286280
Neuro Oncol. 2019 Nov 1;21(Suppl 5):v1-v100
pubmed: 31675094
Cancer. 2000 May 1;88(9):2189-93
pubmed: 10813733
Acta Neuropathol. 2020 Jun;139(6):1115-1118
pubmed: 32124011
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Oct 17;:JCO2017764720
pubmed: 30332335
Neurosurgery. 2017 Jul 1;81(1):120-128
pubmed: 28327927
Acta Neuropathol. 2020 Feb;139(2):243-257
pubmed: 31768671
J Clin Oncol. 2002 Feb 1;20(3):842-9
pubmed: 11821469
Nat Rev Cancer. 2014 Oct;14(10):662-72
pubmed: 25176334