Comparison of outcomes of neurosurgical operations performed before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: a matched cohort study.
COVID-19
neurosurgery
surgery
Journal
BMJ open
ISSN: 2044-6055
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101552874
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
23 02 2021
23 02 2021
Historique:
entrez:
24
2
2021
pubmed:
25
2
2021
medline:
2
3
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To determine how the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic affected outcomes for all operatively managed neurosurgical patients, not only those positive for SARS-CoV-2. Matched cohort (pairwise method). A single tertiary neurosurgical referral centre at a large UK Major Trauma Centre. During the first COVID-19 wave, 231 neurosurgical cases were performed. These cases were matched to cases from 2019. Cases were matched for age (±10 years), primary pathology and surgical procedure. Cases were excluded from analysis if either the age could not be matched to within 10 years, or the primary pathology or procedure was too unique. After exclusions, 191 cases were included in final analysis. Primary outcomes were 30-day mortality and postoperative pulmonary complications. Secondary outcomes included Glasgow Outcome Score (GOS) on discharge, length of stay (LoS), operative and anaesthetic times and grade of primary surgeon. An exploratory outcome was the SARS-CoV-2 status of patients. There was no significant difference between the pandemic and matched cohorts in 30-day mortality, pulmonary complications, discharge GOS, LoS, operative or anaesthetic times. There was a significant difference in the variation of grade of primary surgeon. Only 2.2% (n=5) of patients had a SARS-CoV-2 positive swab. During the first UK wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, the mortality, morbidity and functional outcomes of operatively managed neurosurgical patients at University Hospitals Birmingham were not significantly affected compared with normal practice. The grade of primary surgeon was significantly more senior and adds to the growing body of evidence that demonstrates how the pandemic has negatively impacted UK surgical training. Mixing COVID-19 positive, unknown and negative cases did not significantly impact on outcomes and indicates that further research is required to support the implementation of evidence-based surgical pathways, such as COVID-light sites, throughout the next stage of the pandemic.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33622958
pii: bmjopen-2020-047063
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047063
pmc: PMC7907613
doi:
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e047063Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: None declared.
Références
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020 Oct;160(4):980-987
pubmed: 32605730
Lancet. 1975 Mar 1;1(7905):480-4
pubmed: 46957
EClinicalMedicine. 2020 Jun 03;23:100404
pubmed: 32632416
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2020 Jun;162(6):1229-1240
pubmed: 32314059
World Neurosurg. 2020 Jul;139:e818-e826
pubmed: 32380337
Lancet. 2020 Mar 14;395(10227):e46
pubmed: 32113507
Scott Med J. 2020 Nov;65(4):133-137
pubmed: 32772846
Diabetes Metab. 2020 Jul 29;:101178
pubmed: 32738402
BMJ. 2007 Oct 20;335(7624):806-8
pubmed: 17947786
Lancet. 2020 Jul 4;396(10243):27-38
pubmed: 32479829
World Neurosurg. 2020 Nov;143:633
pubmed: 33167156
World Neurosurg. 2020 Sep;141:e1017-e1026
pubmed: 32599184