Marital status and outcomes in chronic heart failure: Does it make a difference of being married, widow or widower?

Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction marital status widowed

Journal

Northern clinics of Istanbul
ISSN: 2536-4553
Titre abrégé: North Clin Istanb
Pays: Turkey
ID NLM: 101684520

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2021
Historique:
received: 14 10 2020
accepted: 27 12 2020
entrez: 24 2 2021
pubmed: 25 2 2021
medline: 25 2 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

We aimed to compare the outcomes of chronic heart failure (HF) patients with reduced ejection fraction (CHFrEF) in the Turkish Research Team in HF (TREAT-HF) registry according to marital status with a specific focus on being the widowed (widow/widower) versus the married. TREAT-HF is a network, enrolling CHFrEF with a follow up for HF-related hospitalization (HFrH) and all-cause mortality (ACM). In this cohort, the widowed patients were compared with patients who were married before and after propensity score (PS) matching analysis. There were 723 cHFrEF patients with a complete dataset, including reported marital status at baseline for this analysis. Out of 723 patients with HF, 37 "never-married" and "divorced" patients were excluded from the analysis. Then, out of 686 remaining patients with HF, who had at least one reported marriage in the database, widowed patients with HF (n=124) were compared with married patients (n=562). The mean follow up period was 21±12 months up to 48 months. The widowed patients had a higher risk of HFrH (p=0.047), although ACM remained similar compared to married patients (p=0.054). After PS matching, HFrH remained more frequent among the widowed compared with the married (p=0.039) although ACM yielded similar rates. Of note, it was shown that being a widower (p=0.419) was not linked to increased risk of HFrH during follow up contrary to being a widow (p=0.037) despite similar age, ejection fraction, creatinine, NYHA functional class distribution and a similar rate of life-saving medications. PS matching analysis yielded that the widowed had increased the risk for HFrH. Of note, widowers did not seem to have an increased risk for HFrH, contrary to widows.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33623875
doi: 10.14744/nci.2020.88003
pii: NCI-8-63
pmc: PMC7881434
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

63-70

Informations de copyright

Copyright: © 2021 by Istanbul Northern Anatolian Association of Public Hospitals.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflict of Interest: No conflict of interest was declared by the authors.

Références

Acta Cardiol. 2019 Dec 14;:1-9
pubmed: 31838953
Trends Cardiovasc Med. 2020 May;30(4):215-220
pubmed: 31204239
Circulation. 1998 Mar 17;97(10):958-64
pubmed: 9529263
J Marriage Fam. 2012 Aug;74(4):774-793
pubmed: 23226875
Am J Cardiol. 1997 Jun 15;79(12):1640-4
pubmed: 9202355
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2017 Jun;26(6):624-632
pubmed: 28128671
Eur J Heart Fail. 2012 Feb;14(2):138-46
pubmed: 22253454
Gerontologist. 1995 Oct;35(5):637-47
pubmed: 8543221
Heart Lung. 2012 Mar-Apr;41(2):107-14
pubmed: 22054720
Heart Lung. 2006 Jan-Feb;35(1):3-8
pubmed: 16426930
Circulation. 2020 Mar 3;141(9):e139-e596
pubmed: 31992061
Demography. 2012 Aug;49(3):1103-25
pubmed: 22549155
Clin Cardiol. 2016 May;39(5):257-62
pubmed: 26840627
Eur Heart J. 2000 Jul;21(13):1072-80
pubmed: 10843825
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2018 Aug 14;73(6):1032-1042
pubmed: 27131167
Eur J Heart Fail. 2012 Jul;14(7):748-53
pubmed: 22588323
Am Heart J. 2006 Nov;152(5):940.e1-8
pubmed: 17070164
J Health Soc Behav. 2019 Jun;60(2):153-168
pubmed: 30957562
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Oct 15;62(16):e147-239
pubmed: 23747642
Int J Cardiol. 2016 Nov 1;222:313-318
pubmed: 27500756
Am J Cardiol. 2001 Sep 1;88(5):526-9
pubmed: 11524062
J Health Econ. 2008 Sep;27(5):1326-42
pubmed: 18513810
Qual Life Res. 2001;10(8):671-82
pubmed: 11871588
Am J Crit Care. 2009 Nov;18(6):562-70
pubmed: 19880958
Kardiol Pol. 2016;74(10):1037-1147
pubmed: 27748494
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1990 Dec;38(12):1290-5
pubmed: 2254567
Soc Sci Med. 2005 Dec;61(11):2280-92
pubmed: 16115712

Auteurs

Bihter Senturk (B)

Department of Cardiology, Dokuz Eylul University Faculty of Medicine, Izmir, Turkey.

Hakki Kaya (H)

Department of Cardiology, Canakkale University Faculty of Medicine, Canakkale, Turkey.

Ahmet Celik (A)

Department of Cardiology, Mersin University Faculty of Medicine, Mersin, Turkey.

Lutfu Bekar (L)

Department of Cardiology, Hitit University Faculty of Medicine, Corum, Turkey.

Hasan Gungor (H)

Department of Cardiology, Adnan Menderes University Faculty of Medicine, Aydin, Turkey.

Mehdi Zoghi (M)

Department of Cardiology, Ege University Faculty of Medicine, Izmir, Turkey.

Dilek Ural (D)

Department of Cardiology, Kocaeli University Faculty of Medicine, Kocaeli, Turkey.

Yuksel Cavusoglu (Y)

Department of Cardiology, Eskisehir Osmangazi University Faculty of Medicine, Eskisehir, Turkey.

Ahmet Temizhan (A)

Department of Cardiology, Health Sciences University, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.

Mehmet Birhan Yilmaz (MB)

Department of Cardiology, Dokuz Eylul University Faculty of Medicine, Izmir, Turkey.

Classifications MeSH