A Retrospective, Multicenter, Quantitative Analysis of Patients' Baseline Pain Quality (PROMIS-29) Entering into Pain and Spine Practices in the United States (ALIGN).

Chronic pain PROMIS Pain impact score Patient-reported outcomes Promis-29 v2.1 Real-world outcomes

Journal

Pain and therapy
ISSN: 2193-8237
Titre abrégé: Pain Ther
Pays: New Zealand
ID NLM: 101634491

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jun 2021
Historique:
received: 30 11 2020
accepted: 27 01 2021
pubmed: 25 2 2021
medline: 25 2 2021
entrez: 24 2 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Multidisciplinary patient-reported outcomes are a critical part of assessing patients to better understand their well-being during treatment. The use of multidisciplinary patient-reported outcomes is recommended in many areas of medicine. The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-29 (PROMIS-29) has been utilized as a common measurement language across universally relevant domains, including pain, mood, sleep, social participation, and function. Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data was performed. Subjects were identified and consecutively enrolled upon entry into chronic pain centers across 24 sites in the United States. The PROMIS-29 v2.1 and the numerical rating scale (NRS) were recorded. The pain impact score and the Health Utilities Index Mark 3 (HUI-3) were calculated. Statistical differences were assessed between genders and among age groups comprising subjects less than 40, 41-60, 61-80, and over 80 years of age. A total of 19,546 patients were assessed over the enrollment period from 2018 to 2020. The PROMIS-29 v2.1 was evaluated across the seven domains, along with the numerical rating sale (NRS). The mean scores of the population for PROMIS SF v1.0 Pain Interference 4a, PROMIS SF v1.0 Sleep Disturbance 4a, PROMIS SF v1.0 Fatigue 4a, PROMIS SF v1.0 Anxiety 4a, PROMIS SF V1.0 Depression 4a, PROMIS SF v2.0 Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities 4a, and PROMIS SF v1.0 Physical Function 4a, measuring pain interference, sleep disturbance, fatigue, anxiety, depression, social participation, and physical function, were 64.61, 57.19, 58.50, 53.94, 54.45, 40.06, and 36.23, respectively. Pain intensity was 6.38 on an 11-point NRS scale. The pain impact score (PIS) and health utilities index mark 3 (HUI-3) scores, calculated across the designated age groups, were 33.19 and 0.67, respectively. Statistical differences were observed for the domains of sleep disturbance and physical function for age groups less than 40 and greater than 80 years of age. This data set is the first published normative data set describing the PROMIS-29 assessment in the chronic pain population. The patient population is more homogeneous than expected, and females were found to have higher levels of dysfunction.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33624253
doi: 10.1007/s40122-021-00238-z
pii: 10.1007/s40122-021-00238-z
pmc: PMC8119505
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

539-550

Références

Pope JE, Fishman M. Redefining success: longitudinal patient reported outcome measures and the importance of psychometric testing for optimization in neuromodulation. Neuromodul Technol Neural Interface. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1111/ner.12907 .
doi: 10.1111/ner.12907
US Dept of Health and Human Services Pain Task Force. Pain Management Best Practices: Updates, Gaps, Inconsistencies, and Recommendations. 2018.
Deyo RA, Dworkin SF, Amtmann D, et al. Report of the NIH Task Force on research standards for chronic low back pain. J Pain. 2014;15(6):569–85.
doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2014.03.005
Institute of Medicine. Relieving pain in America: a blueprint for transforming prevention, care, education, and research, vol. 26. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2012.
Dworkin RH, Turk DC, Peirce-Sandner S, et al. Research design considerations for confirmatory chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. PAIN®. 2010;149(2):177–93.
doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2010.02.018
Cella D, Riley W, Stone A, et al. The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005–2008. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63(11):1179–94.
doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.011
Hays RD, Spritzer KL, Schalet BD, Cella D. PROMIS®-29 v2.0 profile physical and mental health summary scores. Qual Life Res. 2018;27(7):1885–91.
doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1842-3
Pennings JS, Devin CJ, Khan I, Bydon M, Asher AL, Archer KR. Prediction of Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) using PROMIS-29 in a national sample of lumbar spine surgery patients. Qual Life Res. 2019;28(10):2839–50.
doi: 10.1007/s11136-019-02223-8
Karp JF, Yu L, Friedly J, Amtmann D, Pilkonis PA. Negative affect and sleep disturbance may be associated with response to epidural steroid injections for spine-related pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014;95(2):309–15.
doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.09.007
Cook KF, Schalet BD, Kallen MA, Rutsohn JP, Cella D. Establishing a common metric for self-reported pain: linking BPI Pain Interference and SF-36 Bodily Pain Subscale scores to the PROMIS Pain Interference metric. Qual Life Res. 2015;24(10):2305–18.
doi: 10.1007/s11136-015-0987-6
Hartman JD, Craig BM. Comparing and transforming PROMIS utility values to the EQ-5D. Qual Life Res. 2018;27(3):725–33.
doi: 10.1007/s11136-017-1769-0
Hays RD, Revicki DA, Feeny D, Fayers P, Spritzer KL, Cella D. Using linear equating to map PROMIS® global health items and the PROMIS-29 V2.0 profile measure to the Health Utilities Index Mark 3. Pharmacoeconomics. 2016;34(10):1015–22.
doi: 10.1007/s40273-016-0408-x
Craig BM, Reeve BB, Brown PM, et al. US valuation of health outcomes measured using the PROMIS-29. Value Health. 2014;17(8):846–53.
doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2014.09.005
Deyo RA, Ramsey K, Buckley DI, et al. Performance of a patient reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) short form in older adults with chronic musculoskeletal pain. Pain Med. 2016;17(2):314–24. https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnv046 .
doi: 10.1093/pm/pnv046 pubmed: 26814279
Heros RD, Fishman MA, Pope JE, Falowski SM, Patterson DG. Pain impact scores are an effective predictive tool for neurostimulator trial success: initial results of the STIMPACT study. In: NANS Annual Meeting. Las Vegas; 2020.
Horsman J, Furlong W, Feeny D, Torrance G. The Health Utilities Index (HUI®): concepts, measurement properties and applications. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2003;1:1–13.
doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-1-54
Feeny D, Furlong W, Torrance GW, et al. Multiattribute and single-attribute utility functions for the Health Utilities Index Mark 3 system. Med Care. 2002;40(2):113–28.
doi: 10.1097/00005650-200202000-00006

Auteurs

Jason E Pope (JE)

Evolve Restorative Center, Santa Rosa, CA, USA. popeje@me.com.

Michael Fishman (M)

Main Line Health, Exton, PA, USA.

Krishnan Chakravarthy (K)

UCSD Health and VA San Diego Healthcare, San Diego, CA, USA.

Michael Hanes (M)

Jacksonville Spine and Pain Centers, Jacksonville, FL, USA.

Michael Gerling (M)

NYU Langone Health, Tribeca, NY, USA.

Robert Heros (R)

Spinal Diagnostics, Tualatin, OR, USA.

Steven Falowski (S)

Argires Marotti Neurosurgical Associates of Lancaster, Lancaster, PA, USA.

Jay Shah (J)

SamWell Institute of Pain Management, Colonia, NJ, USA.

Vwaire Orhurhu (V)

Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.

Ivan Urits (I)

Southcoast Health Physicians Group Pain Medicine, Wareham, MA, USA.

Timothy R Deer (TR)

The Spine and Nerve Center of The Virginias, Charleston, WV, USA.

Classifications MeSH