Cost-Effectiveness of Pembrolizumab for the Adjuvant Treatment of Melanoma Patients with Lymph Node Involvement Who Have Undergone Complete Resection in Argentina.

Adjuvant treatment Argentina Cost-effectiveness Latin America Melanoma Pembrolizumab

Journal

Oncology and therapy
ISSN: 2366-1089
Titre abrégé: Oncol Ther
Pays: New Zealand
ID NLM: 101677510

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jun 2021
Historique:
received: 17 12 2020
accepted: 23 01 2021
pubmed: 25 2 2021
medline: 25 2 2021
entrez: 24 2 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The KEYNOTE-054 trial demonstrated that adjuvant pembrolizumab improves recurrence-free survival in completely resected stage III melanoma versus watchful waiting (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.57; 98.4% confidence interval [CI], 0.43-0.74). We evaluated the cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab in Argentina, where watchful waiting is still widely used among these patients despite the high risk of recurrence with surgery alone. A four-health state model was used (recurrence-free, locoregional recurrence [LR], distant metastases [DM], death). Lifetime medical costs to payers (72.08 Argentine pesos [AR$] = 1.00 U.S. dollar [USD]) and outcomes (3% annual discount) were assessed, together with incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). First and LR→DM recurrences were modeled using KEYNOTE-054 and real-world data, respectively. No benefits of adjuvant treatment were assumed post-progression. Pre-DM and post-DM mortality was based on KEYNOTE-054 and on a network meta-analysis of advanced treatments expected in each arm, respectively. Utilities were derived from KEYNOTE-054 Euro-QoL data using an Argentinian algorithm, and from the literature. Public ex-factory drug prices were used. Patients in the pembrolizumab and the watchful waiting arms accrued 8.78 and 5.83 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), 9.91 and 6.98 life-years, and costs of AR$12,698,595 (176,174 USD) and AR$11,967,717 (166,034 USD), respectively. The proportion of life-years accrued that were recurrence-free was 80.8% and 56.9% in the pembrolizumab and the watchful waiting arms, respectively. Pembrolizumab patients gained 2.94 life-years and 2.96 QALYs versus watchful waiting; the ICER per QALY was AR$247,094 (3428 USD). Recurrence rates and advanced melanoma treatments were the key drivers of the ICER. At a threshold of AR$1,445,325 (29,935 USD) per QALY, pembrolizumab had an 83.5% probability of being cost-effective versus watchful waiting. Adjuvant pembrolizumab after complete resection of melanoma with node involvement is highly cost-effective relative to watchful waiting in Argentina, across disease stage subgroups and BRAF mutational status. This strongly supports its coverage and reimbursement across the entire health system.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33624271
doi: 10.1007/s40487-021-00142-8
pii: 10.1007/s40487-021-00142-8
pmc: PMC8140053
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

167-185

Références

Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2020 Oct;10(5):985-999
pubmed: 32548707
Med Decis Making. 2017 May;37(4):340-352
pubmed: 27281337
Value Health. 2009 Jun;12(4):587-96
pubmed: 19900257
Lancet Oncol. 2016 Nov;17(11):1558-1568
pubmed: 27622997
Lancet Oncol. 2016 Sep;17(9):1248-60
pubmed: 27480103
Stat Med. 2007 May 20;26(11):2389-430
pubmed: 17031868
Ecancermedicalscience. 2020 Mar 05;14:1017
pubmed: 32256700
N Engl J Med. 2017 Nov 9;377(19):1888-1890
pubmed: 29117487
Arch Dermatol. 2010 Mar;146(3):249-56
pubmed: 20231494
Lancet. 2017 Oct 21;390(10105):1853-1862
pubmed: 28822576
Br J Cancer. 2009 Aug 4;101(3):387-9
pubmed: 19603025
Eur J Cancer. 2019 Sep;119:1-10
pubmed: 31400634
Lancet. 2002 Mar 16;359(9310):978-9
pubmed: 11918944
J Med Econ. 2019 Oct;22(10):981-993
pubmed: 31012765
Lancet. 2015 Aug 1;386(9992):444-51
pubmed: 26037941
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jan 22;372(4):320-30
pubmed: 25399552
N Engl J Med. 2016 Nov 10;375(19):1845-1855
pubmed: 27717298
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jan 1;372(1):30-9
pubmed: 25399551
N Engl J Med. 2018 May 10;378(19):1789-1801
pubmed: 29658430
Curr Opin Oncol. 1997 Mar;9(2):189-204
pubmed: 9161800
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2019 Apr 1;17(4):367-402
pubmed: 30959471
Oncologist. 2012;17(10):1323-8
pubmed: 23002124
Br J Dermatol. 2017 Jul;177(1):134-140
pubmed: 28369739
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jul 2;373(1):23-34
pubmed: 26027431
CA Cancer J Clin. 2017 Nov;67(6):472-492
pubmed: 29028110
An Bras Dermatol. 2015 Nov-Dec;90(6):851-61
pubmed: 26734867
PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e57665
pubmed: 23516415
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Dec 20;27(36):6199-206
pubmed: 19917835
Med Decis Making. 2013 Aug;33(6):743-54
pubmed: 23341049
Med Decis Making. 2017 May;37(4):427-439
pubmed: 27698003
J Oncol Pract. 2012 Nov;8(6):75s-80s
pubmed: 23598848
Lancet Oncol. 2014 Mar;15(3):323-32
pubmed: 24508103

Auteurs

Victoria Wurcel (V)

MSD Argentina, Buenos Aires, Argentina. victoria.wurcel@merck.com.

Emilie Scherrer (E)

Merck & Co., Inc, Kenilworth, NJ, USA.

Raquel Aguiar-Ibanez (R)

Merck & Co., Inc, Kenilworth, NJ, USA.

Juan Ignacio Altuna (JI)

MSD Argentina, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Fernando Carabajal (F)

MSD Argentina, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Shrishti Jain (S)

Complete HEOR Solutions, CHEORS, North Wales, PA, USA.

Gargi Baluni (G)

Complete HEOR Solutions, CHEORS, North Wales, PA, USA.

Classifications MeSH