Cost-Effectiveness of Pembrolizumab for the Adjuvant Treatment of Melanoma Patients with Lymph Node Involvement Who Have Undergone Complete Resection in Argentina.
Adjuvant treatment
Argentina
Cost-effectiveness
Latin America
Melanoma
Pembrolizumab
Journal
Oncology and therapy
ISSN: 2366-1089
Titre abrégé: Oncol Ther
Pays: New Zealand
ID NLM: 101677510
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2021
Jun 2021
Historique:
received:
17
12
2020
accepted:
23
01
2021
pubmed:
25
2
2021
medline:
25
2
2021
entrez:
24
2
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The KEYNOTE-054 trial demonstrated that adjuvant pembrolizumab improves recurrence-free survival in completely resected stage III melanoma versus watchful waiting (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.57; 98.4% confidence interval [CI], 0.43-0.74). We evaluated the cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab in Argentina, where watchful waiting is still widely used among these patients despite the high risk of recurrence with surgery alone. A four-health state model was used (recurrence-free, locoregional recurrence [LR], distant metastases [DM], death). Lifetime medical costs to payers (72.08 Argentine pesos [AR$] = 1.00 U.S. dollar [USD]) and outcomes (3% annual discount) were assessed, together with incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). First and LR→DM recurrences were modeled using KEYNOTE-054 and real-world data, respectively. No benefits of adjuvant treatment were assumed post-progression. Pre-DM and post-DM mortality was based on KEYNOTE-054 and on a network meta-analysis of advanced treatments expected in each arm, respectively. Utilities were derived from KEYNOTE-054 Euro-QoL data using an Argentinian algorithm, and from the literature. Public ex-factory drug prices were used. Patients in the pembrolizumab and the watchful waiting arms accrued 8.78 and 5.83 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), 9.91 and 6.98 life-years, and costs of AR$12,698,595 (176,174 USD) and AR$11,967,717 (166,034 USD), respectively. The proportion of life-years accrued that were recurrence-free was 80.8% and 56.9% in the pembrolizumab and the watchful waiting arms, respectively. Pembrolizumab patients gained 2.94 life-years and 2.96 QALYs versus watchful waiting; the ICER per QALY was AR$247,094 (3428 USD). Recurrence rates and advanced melanoma treatments were the key drivers of the ICER. At a threshold of AR$1,445,325 (29,935 USD) per QALY, pembrolizumab had an 83.5% probability of being cost-effective versus watchful waiting. Adjuvant pembrolizumab after complete resection of melanoma with node involvement is highly cost-effective relative to watchful waiting in Argentina, across disease stage subgroups and BRAF mutational status. This strongly supports its coverage and reimbursement across the entire health system.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33624271
doi: 10.1007/s40487-021-00142-8
pii: 10.1007/s40487-021-00142-8
pmc: PMC8140053
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
167-185Références
Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2020 Oct;10(5):985-999
pubmed: 32548707
Med Decis Making. 2017 May;37(4):340-352
pubmed: 27281337
Value Health. 2009 Jun;12(4):587-96
pubmed: 19900257
Lancet Oncol. 2016 Nov;17(11):1558-1568
pubmed: 27622997
Lancet Oncol. 2016 Sep;17(9):1248-60
pubmed: 27480103
Stat Med. 2007 May 20;26(11):2389-430
pubmed: 17031868
Ecancermedicalscience. 2020 Mar 05;14:1017
pubmed: 32256700
N Engl J Med. 2017 Nov 9;377(19):1888-1890
pubmed: 29117487
Arch Dermatol. 2010 Mar;146(3):249-56
pubmed: 20231494
Lancet. 2017 Oct 21;390(10105):1853-1862
pubmed: 28822576
Br J Cancer. 2009 Aug 4;101(3):387-9
pubmed: 19603025
Eur J Cancer. 2019 Sep;119:1-10
pubmed: 31400634
Lancet. 2002 Mar 16;359(9310):978-9
pubmed: 11918944
J Med Econ. 2019 Oct;22(10):981-993
pubmed: 31012765
Lancet. 2015 Aug 1;386(9992):444-51
pubmed: 26037941
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jan 22;372(4):320-30
pubmed: 25399552
N Engl J Med. 2016 Nov 10;375(19):1845-1855
pubmed: 27717298
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jan 1;372(1):30-9
pubmed: 25399551
N Engl J Med. 2018 May 10;378(19):1789-1801
pubmed: 29658430
Curr Opin Oncol. 1997 Mar;9(2):189-204
pubmed: 9161800
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2019 Apr 1;17(4):367-402
pubmed: 30959471
Oncologist. 2012;17(10):1323-8
pubmed: 23002124
Br J Dermatol. 2017 Jul;177(1):134-140
pubmed: 28369739
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jul 2;373(1):23-34
pubmed: 26027431
CA Cancer J Clin. 2017 Nov;67(6):472-492
pubmed: 29028110
An Bras Dermatol. 2015 Nov-Dec;90(6):851-61
pubmed: 26734867
PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e57665
pubmed: 23516415
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Dec 20;27(36):6199-206
pubmed: 19917835
Med Decis Making. 2013 Aug;33(6):743-54
pubmed: 23341049
Med Decis Making. 2017 May;37(4):427-439
pubmed: 27698003
J Oncol Pract. 2012 Nov;8(6):75s-80s
pubmed: 23598848
Lancet Oncol. 2014 Mar;15(3):323-32
pubmed: 24508103