Abelson kinase's intrinsically disordered region plays essential roles in protein function and protein stability.


Journal

Cell communication and signaling : CCS
ISSN: 1478-811X
Titre abrégé: Cell Commun Signal
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101170464

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
24 02 2021
Historique:
received: 18 11 2020
accepted: 29 12 2020
entrez: 25 2 2021
pubmed: 26 2 2021
medline: 30 12 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The non-receptor tyrosine kinase Abelson (Abl) is a key player in oncogenesis, with kinase inhibitors serving as paradigms of targeted therapy. Abl also is a critical regulator of normal development, playing conserved roles in regulating cell behavior, brain development and morphogenesis. Drosophila offers a superb model for studying Abl's normal function, because, unlike mammals, there is only a single fly Abl family member. In exploring the mechanism of action of multi-domain scaffolding proteins like Abl, one route is to define the roles of their individual domains. Research into Abl's diverse roles in embryonic morphogenesis revealed many surprises. For instance, kinase activity, while important, is not crucial for all Abl activities, and the C-terminal F-actin binding domain plays a very modest role. This turned our attention to one of Abl's least understood features-the long intrinsically-disordered region (IDR) linking Abl's kinase and F-actin binding domains. The past decade revealed unexpected, important roles for IDRs in diverse cell functions, as sites of posttranslational modifications, mediating multivalent interactions and enabling assembly of biomolecular condensates via phase separation. Previous work deleting conserved regions in Abl's IDR revealed an important role for a PXXP motif, but did not identify any other essential regions. Here we extend this analysis by deleting the entire IDR, and asking whether Abl∆IDR rescues the diverse roles of Abl in viability and embryonic morphogenesis in Drosophila. This revealed that the IDR is essential for embryonic and adult viability, and for cell shape changes and cytoskeletal regulation during embryonic morphogenesis, and, most surprisingly, revealed a role in modulating protein stability. Our data provide new insights into the role of the IDR in an important signaling protein, the non-receptor kinase Abl, suggesting that it is essential for all aspects of protein function during embryogenesis, and revealing a role in protein stability. These data will stimulate new explorations of the mechanisms by which the IDR regulates Abl stability and function, both in Drosophila and also in mammals. They also will stimulate further interest in the broader roles IDRs play in diverse signaling proteins. Video Abstract.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
The non-receptor tyrosine kinase Abelson (Abl) is a key player in oncogenesis, with kinase inhibitors serving as paradigms of targeted therapy. Abl also is a critical regulator of normal development, playing conserved roles in regulating cell behavior, brain development and morphogenesis. Drosophila offers a superb model for studying Abl's normal function, because, unlike mammals, there is only a single fly Abl family member. In exploring the mechanism of action of multi-domain scaffolding proteins like Abl, one route is to define the roles of their individual domains. Research into Abl's diverse roles in embryonic morphogenesis revealed many surprises. For instance, kinase activity, while important, is not crucial for all Abl activities, and the C-terminal F-actin binding domain plays a very modest role. This turned our attention to one of Abl's least understood features-the long intrinsically-disordered region (IDR) linking Abl's kinase and F-actin binding domains. The past decade revealed unexpected, important roles for IDRs in diverse cell functions, as sites of posttranslational modifications, mediating multivalent interactions and enabling assembly of biomolecular condensates via phase separation. Previous work deleting conserved regions in Abl's IDR revealed an important role for a PXXP motif, but did not identify any other essential regions.
METHODS
Here we extend this analysis by deleting the entire IDR, and asking whether Abl∆IDR rescues the diverse roles of Abl in viability and embryonic morphogenesis in Drosophila.
RESULTS
This revealed that the IDR is essential for embryonic and adult viability, and for cell shape changes and cytoskeletal regulation during embryonic morphogenesis, and, most surprisingly, revealed a role in modulating protein stability.
CONCLUSION
Our data provide new insights into the role of the IDR in an important signaling protein, the non-receptor kinase Abl, suggesting that it is essential for all aspects of protein function during embryogenesis, and revealing a role in protein stability. These data will stimulate new explorations of the mechanisms by which the IDR regulates Abl stability and function, both in Drosophila and also in mammals. They also will stimulate further interest in the broader roles IDRs play in diverse signaling proteins. Video Abstract.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33627133
doi: 10.1186/s12964-020-00703-w
pii: 10.1186/s12964-020-00703-w
pmc: PMC7905622
doi:

Substances chimiques

Drosophila Proteins 0
Intrinsically Disordered Proteins 0
Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-abl EC 2.7.10.2

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

27

Subventions

Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : R01 GM047857
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : R35 GM118096
Pays : United States

Références

Annu Rev Biochem. 2014;83:553-84
pubmed: 24606139
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2017 May;18(5):285-298
pubmed: 28225081
Nat Genet. 2000 Mar;24(3):304-8
pubmed: 10700189
J Cell Sci. 2016 Jan 1;129(1):9-16
pubmed: 26729027
Nucleic Acids Res. 2013 Jan;41(Database issue):D508-16
pubmed: 23203878
Nature. 2012 Mar 07;483(7389):336-40
pubmed: 22398450
J Neurosci. 2010 Oct 27;30(43):14430-9
pubmed: 20980600
Biochemistry. 2017 Dec 19;56(50):6565-6574
pubmed: 29168376
PLoS One. 2017 Dec 12;12(12):e0189338
pubmed: 29232713
Dev Cell. 2012 Feb 14;22(2):309-19
pubmed: 22340496
Genetics. 1996 Dec;144(4):1673-9
pubmed: 8978054
J Biol Chem. 2016 Mar 25;291(13):6723-31
pubmed: 26851277
Curr Biol. 2001 Nov 13;11(22):1759-65
pubmed: 11719217
Mol Biol Cell. 2019 Jul 22;30(16):1938-1960
pubmed: 31188739
Genes Cancer. 2012 May;3(5-6):402-13
pubmed: 23226578
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2003 Oct;13(5):535-44
pubmed: 14630215
J Mol Biol. 2018 Aug 3;430(16):2342-2359
pubmed: 29626537
Neural Dev. 2020 May 2;15(1):7
pubmed: 32359359
Proteins. 2010 Feb 1;78(2):365-80
pubmed: 19722269
Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2004 Sep;11(9):830-7
pubmed: 15311270
Nat Rev Cancer. 2005 Mar;5(3):172-83
pubmed: 15719031
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Jul 23;110(30):12432-7
pubmed: 23840065
Mol Biol Cell. 2014 Oct 15;25(20):3147-65
pubmed: 25143400
Blood. 2002 Mar 15;99(6):1928-37
pubmed: 11877262
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Jan 19;107(3):1136-41
pubmed: 20080568
J Biol Chem. 2015 Feb 13;290(7):4038-46
pubmed: 25540195
Mech Dev. 2017 Apr;144(Pt A):2-10
pubmed: 28077304
Sci Signal. 2010 Sep 14;3(139):re6
pubmed: 20841568
J Immunol. 2007 Dec 1;179(11):7334-43
pubmed: 18025176
Development. 2007 Feb;134(3):567-78
pubmed: 17202187
Blood. 2008 Jul 1;112(1):111-9
pubmed: 18305217
Development. 2013 Jul;140(13):2724-33
pubmed: 23720041
Oncogene. 2005 Apr 7;24(15):2433-40
pubmed: 15735735
Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2017 Oct 6;33:169-202
pubmed: 28992442
J Neurosci. 2005 Jun 29;25(26):6105-18
pubmed: 15987940
Neuron. 1998 Dec;21(6):1259-72
pubmed: 9883720
Biochemistry. 2018 May 1;57(17):2415-2423
pubmed: 29323488
Development. 2007 Jun;134(11):2027-39
pubmed: 17507404
J Cell Biol. 2001 Dec 24;155(7):1185-98
pubmed: 11756472
Science. 1990 May 18;248(4957):857-60
pubmed: 2188361
J Cell Biol. 2003 Dec 22;163(6):1267-79
pubmed: 14676307
Nat Commun. 2011 Feb 08;2:192
pubmed: 21304521
Elife. 2017 Dec 12;6:
pubmed: 29231808
Mol Biol Cell. 2016 Aug 15;27(16):2613-31
pubmed: 27385341
Blood. 2002 May 15;99(10):3530-9
pubmed: 11986204
Curr Biol. 2004 Jul 27;14(14):1222-31
pubmed: 15268851
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Feb 27;104(9):3312-7
pubmed: 17360644
Mol Cell Proteomics. 2013 Sep;12(9):2456-67
pubmed: 23716602
Cell. 1990 Nov 30;63(5):949-60
pubmed: 2175256
Mol Biol Cell. 2000 Sep;11(9):3123-35
pubmed: 10982405
Cell Immunol. 1996 Aug 25;172(1):100-7
pubmed: 8806812
Fly (Austin). 2017 Oct 2;11(4):260-270
pubmed: 28481649
Cell. 1987 Dec 4;51(5):821-8
pubmed: 3119227
J Neurosci. 2013 Jan 30;33(5):1846-57
pubmed: 23365224
Mol Biol Cell. 2008 Jan;19(1):378-93
pubmed: 17959833
Protein Sci. 2014 Aug;23(8):1077-93
pubmed: 24888500
Mol Biol Cell. 2019 Aug 15;30(18):2399-2421
pubmed: 31318326
Cell Immunol. 1995 Oct 1;165(1):44-54
pubmed: 7671324
PLoS One. 2013 Dec 19;8(12):e85231
pubmed: 24367707
Development. 1993 Dec;119(4):1359-69
pubmed: 8306893
Cell Mol Life Sci. 2020 Oct;77(19):3885-3903
pubmed: 31820037
J Cell Sci. 2009 Oct 1;122(Pt 19):3441-54
pubmed: 19759284
Biochem J. 2003 Feb 15;370(Pt 1):29-34
pubmed: 12475393
J Cell Biol. 2004 May 10;165(3):407-19
pubmed: 15138293
Cell. 1991 Jun 28;65(7):1153-63
pubmed: 2065352

Auteurs

Edward M Rogers (EM)

Department of Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.

S Colby Allred (SC)

Department of Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.

Mark Peifer (M)

Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA. peifer@unc.edu.

Articles similaires

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male
Humans Meals Time Factors Female Adult

Classifications MeSH