Drought-induced reduction in flower size and abundance correlates with reduced flower visits by bumble bees.
Climate change
RFID
floral traits
plant–insect interactions
pollination
pollinators
Journal
AoB PLANTS
ISSN: 2041-2851
Titre abrégé: AoB Plants
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101539425
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Feb 2021
Feb 2021
Historique:
accepted:
05
01
2021
entrez:
25
2
2021
pubmed:
26
2
2021
medline:
26
2
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Reduced water availability can cause physiological stress in plants that affects floral development leading to changes in floral morphology and traits that mediate interactions with pollinators. As pollinators can detect small changes in trait expressions, drought-induced changes in floral traits could affect pollinator visitations. However, the linkage between changes in floral traits and pollinator visitations under drought conditions is not well explored. We, therefore, tested whether drought-induced changes in floral morphology and abundance of flowers are linked to changes in pollinator visitations. We conducted flight cage experiments with a radio frequency identification system for automated visitation recordings with bumble bees (
Identifiants
pubmed: 33628409
doi: 10.1093/aobpla/plab001
pii: plab001
pmc: PMC7891244
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
plab001Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Annals of Botany Company.
Références
Ecology. 2016 Jun;97(6):1400-9
pubmed: 27459771
Ecology. 2011 Dec;92(12):2167-74
pubmed: 22352154
Ecol Lett. 2014 Dec;17(12):1580-90
pubmed: 25327976
Plant Physiol Biochem. 2019 Nov;144:283-291
pubmed: 31593901
Evolution. 2016 Mar;70(3):716-24
pubmed: 26878831
Annu Rev Entomol. 2016;61:433-51
pubmed: 26667379
Evolution. 1996 Feb;50(1):120-125
pubmed: 28568888
Oecologia. 1980 May;45(2):197-201
pubmed: 28309530
J Chem Ecol. 2013 Jan;39(1):67-75
pubmed: 23288373
Evolution. 1989 Mar;43(2):318-334
pubmed: 28568547
Oecologia. 1983 Mar;57(1-2):274-280
pubmed: 28310186
Am J Bot. 2001 Mar;88(3):438-46
pubmed: 11250821
Glob Chang Biol. 2018 Jul;24(7):3226-3235
pubmed: 29652102
New Phytol. 2017 Jul;215(2):792-802
pubmed: 28517023
Oecologia. 1996 Mar;105(4):509-516
pubmed: 28307144
Ann Bot. 2019 Mar 14;123(4):601-610
pubmed: 30364929
Am J Bot. 1999 Jan;86(1):39-55
pubmed: 21680344
Plant Cell Environ. 2016 Oct;39(10):2123-32
pubmed: 27144996
Am Nat. 2000 Jul;156(1):72-83
pubmed: 10824022
Oecologia. 2010 Aug;163(4):961-71
pubmed: 20461411
Plant Cell Environ. 2018 Oct;41(10):2250-2262
pubmed: 29603273
Ecol Evol. 2019 Aug 14;9(18):10291-10304
pubmed: 31632643
Oecologia. 1998 Jun;115(1-2):93-101
pubmed: 28308473
Am J Bot. 2006 Apr;93(4):531-8
pubmed: 21646213
Nature. 2007 Jun 7;447(7145):706-9
pubmed: 17554306
R Soc Open Sci. 2016 Jan 06;3(1):150599
pubmed: 26909189
Am J Bot. 2013 Jul;100(7):1322-31
pubmed: 23748678
Oecologia. 2001 Feb;126(3):386-394
pubmed: 28547453
Ecol Lett. 2019 Mar;22(3):469-479
pubmed: 30609161
New Phytol. 2018 Nov;220(3):785-798
pubmed: 29575008
New Phytol. 2019 Jul;223(1):193-203
pubmed: 30767230
Science. 2015 Sep 25;349(6255):1541-4
pubmed: 26404836
Glob Chang Biol. 2016 Apr;22(4):1644-54
pubmed: 26546275
New Phytol. 2016 Jun;210(4):1357-68
pubmed: 26840542
Science. 2020 Feb 7;367(6478):685-688
pubmed: 32029628