The advantages of the dental operative microscope in restorative dentistry.

dental operating microscope magnification microscope restorations restorative dentistry

Journal

Medicine and pharmacy reports
ISSN: 2668-0572
Titre abrégé: Med Pharm Rep
Pays: Romania
ID NLM: 101742144

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jan 2021
Historique:
received: 20 04 2020
revised: 10 09 2020
accepted: 28 09 2020
entrez: 25 2 2021
pubmed: 26 2 2021
medline: 26 2 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Magnification devices improve direct and indirect vision and precision being significantly higher in microscope use compared to the loupes. Dental loupes are the most commonly used devices for magnification, due to the more affordable prices and the ease of use without major changes in the working protocol and ergonomics. Loupes primary benefits reported refers to ergonomics and posture, restoration evaluation/detection and overall treatment quality. There are some disadvantages that limit the use of loupes among dentists: lack of fixed position (fine movements of the dentist's head disturb the image of the magnified operating field); the need to change the loupes to achieve different magnification. On the contrary, the use of a dental microscope require minimum adjustment and effort so as to reduce postural deviation while working. It has been more than 30 years since dental practitioners raised the issue of using dental operating microscopes (DOM) in restorative dentistry, identifying the benefits of magnification in diagnosis and treatment steps. The growth is evident in recent years, maybe because of the familiarity of dentists with dental microscopes which have already become implicit endowment for endodontic specialists. Fiber optic lighting is the key factor that complements the magnification offered by the microscope so that treatments can now be performed under increased safety conditions and in conditions of significantly higher quality than in the past. Since the beginning of the 2000s the principles of minimally invasive dentistry have been widely promoted in dentistry. These principles are major impetus for the use of microscope by dentists. Working with magnification leads dentists to be more conservative with dental tissues.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33629044
doi: 10.15386/mpr-1662
pii: cm-94-22
pmc: PMC7880065
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Pagination

22-27

Références

Stomatol DDR. 1979 Jan;29(1):15-8
pubmed: 285479
J Investig Clin Dent. 2013 May;4(2):120-3
pubmed: 23097188
Dent Today. 2013 Jun;32(6):97-100
pubmed: 23802379
J Calif Dent Assoc. 2002 Feb;30(2):161-9
pubmed: 11881960
J Endod. 2002 May;28(5):378-83
pubmed: 12026924
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2015 Aug;7(Suppl 2):S393-7
pubmed: 26538885
Dent Today. 2003 Jun;22(6):93-9
pubmed: 12847849
Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2021 Mar;27(1):136-143
pubmed: 30689535
N Y State Dent J. 2015 Jun-Jul;81(4):18-23
pubmed: 26373029
J Endod. 1999 Jun;25(6):446-50
pubmed: 10530248
Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent. 1999 Oct;11(8):925-31; quiz 932
pubmed: 10853599
J Dent Educ. 2004 Mar;68(3):384-9
pubmed: 15038640
Oper Dent. 2018 Sep/Oct;43(5):501-507
pubmed: 29513642
J Endod. 2010 Jul;36(7):1135-8
pubmed: 20630285
Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed. 2002;112(7):722-32
pubmed: 12185726
Oper Dent. 2010 Mar-Apr;35(2):246-9
pubmed: 20420069
Int J Dent Hyg. 2004 Feb;2(1):26-35
pubmed: 16451449
J Endod. 2004 Dec;30(12):860-2
pubmed: 15564864
J Prosthodont. 2003 Dec;12(4):271-9
pubmed: 15061237

Auteurs

Marius Bud (M)

Department of Conservative Dentistry, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

Stefan Jitaru (S)

Department of Conservative Dentistry, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

Ondine Lucaciu (O)

Department of Oral Rehabilitation, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

Bora Korkut (B)

Department of Restorative Dentistry, Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey.

Lucia Dumitrascu-Timis (L)

Department of Conservative Dentistry, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

Corina Ionescu (C)

Department of Conservative Dentistry, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

Sanda Cimpean (S)

Department of Conservative Dentistry, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

Ada Delean (A)

Department of Conservative Dentistry, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

Classifications MeSH