Beneficial Effects of a Perindopril/Indapamide Single-Pill Combination in Hypertensive Patients with Diabetes and/or Obesity or Metabolic Syndrome: A Post Hoc Pooled Analysis of Four Observational Studies.
Aged
Antihypertensive Agents
/ therapeutic use
Blood Pressure
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
/ complications
Drug Combinations
Humans
Hypertension
/ complications
Indapamide
/ therapeutic use
Metabolic Syndrome
/ complications
Middle Aged
Obesity
/ complications
Perindopril
/ therapeutic use
Treatment Outcome
Blood pressure control
Hypertension
Indapamide
Metabolic syndrome
Obesity
Perindopril
Single-pill combination
Type 2 diabetes mellitus
Journal
Advances in therapy
ISSN: 1865-8652
Titre abrégé: Adv Ther
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8611864
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 2021
04 2021
Historique:
received:
16
12
2020
accepted:
05
01
2021
pubmed:
26
2
2021
medline:
20
4
2021
entrez:
25
2
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To assess real-life effectiveness of a perindopril/indapamide (Per/Ind) single-pill combination (SPC) in patients with hypertension (HT) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), obesity and/or metabolic syndrome (MetS). This post hoc analysis pooled raw data from four large observational studies (FORTISSIMO, FORSAGE, ACES, PICASSO). Patients, most with uncontrolled blood pressure (BP) on previous treatments were switched to Per/Ind (10 mg/2.5 mg) SPC at study entry. Office systolic and diastolic blood pressures (SBP and DBP) were measured at baseline, 1 month and 3 months. In the overall pooled population (N = 16,763), mean age was 61 ± 12 years, HT duration 11 ± 8 years, and baseline SBP/DBP 162/94 mmHg. T2DM, obesity and MetS were present in 21%, 49% and 27% of patients, respectively. Subgroups had similar mean age and HT duration to the overall population; patients with T2DM were slightly older (64 ± 10 years) with a longer HT duration (13 ± 8 years). Mean BP was approximately 160/95 mmHg in each subgroup. At 1 month, mean SBP decreased by approximately 20 mmHg in the overall population, and by a further 10 mmHg at 3 months. Similar results were observed in the three subgroups, with mean changes from baseline at 3 months of - 28 ± 15/- 13 ± 10 in T2DM; - 30 ± 15/- 14 ± 10 in obesity; and - 31 ± 15/- 15 ± 9 mmHg in MetS. BP decreases were greatest in patients with grade II or grade III HT. BP control rates (< 140/90 mmHg or 140/85 mmHg for T2DM) at 3 months were 59% in T2DM, 67% in obese, and 66% in MetS. No specific safety concerns were raised, particularly concerning ionic (Na, K) or metabolic profiles. Switching to Per/Ind SPC led to rapid and effective BP decreases in patients with T2DM, obesity, or MetS. BP control was achieved in 6-7 out of 10 previously treated but uncontrolled patients. Treatment was well tolerated. The results confirm the beneficial effects of a Per/Ind SPC for difficult-to-control patient populations.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33630277
doi: 10.1007/s12325-021-01619-8
pii: 10.1007/s12325-021-01619-8
pmc: PMC8004479
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antihypertensive Agents
0
Drug Combinations
0
Indapamide
F089I0511L
Perindopril
Y5GMK36KGY
Types de publication
Journal Article
Meta-Analysis
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Pagination
1776-1790Références
Circulation. 2002 Dec 17;106(25):3143-421
pubmed: 12485966
Adv Ther. 2021 Jan;38(1):479-494
pubmed: 33150570
Am J Med. 2009 Mar;122(3):290-300
pubmed: 19272490
Adv Ther. 2014 Mar;31(3):333-44
pubmed: 24554346
N Engl J Med. 2017 Jul 6;377(1):13-27
pubmed: 28604169
J Hypertens. 2004 Aug;22(8):1613-22
pubmed: 15257186
Hypertension. 2003 May;41(5):1063-71
pubmed: 12654706
Lancet. 2007 Sep 8;370(9590):829-40
pubmed: 17765963
JAMA. 2013 Sep 4;310(9):959-68
pubmed: 24002282
J Hum Hypertens. 2010 May;24(5):336-44
pubmed: 19798089
Curr Med Res Opin. 2009 Sep;25(9):2271-80
pubmed: 19627177
PLoS One. 2014 Sep 22;9(9):e107294
pubmed: 25244618
N Engl J Med. 2014 Oct 9;371(15):1392-406
pubmed: 25234206
J Hypertens. 2012 Jun;30(6):1047-55
pubmed: 22573071
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Apr;97(15):e0256
pubmed: 29642146
Clin Drug Investig. 2017 Feb;37(2):207-217
pubmed: 27878562
Kardiologiia. 2016 Jan;56(1):18-24
pubmed: 28294726
Eur Heart J. 2018 Oct 21;39(40):3654-3661
pubmed: 30060044
Hypertension. 2010 May;55(5):1193-8
pubmed: 20212271
Am J Hypertens. 2010 Nov;23(11):1170-8
pubmed: 20706196
Blood Press. 2013 Sep;22 Suppl 1:3-10
pubmed: 23163322
J Hypertens. 2017 May;35(5):922-944
pubmed: 28141660
Curr Med Res Opin. 2018 Sep;34(9):1557-1570
pubmed: 29307229
Lancet. 2014 May 31;383(9932):1912-9
pubmed: 24881995
Adv Chronic Kidney Dis. 2015 May;22(3):211-7
pubmed: 25908470
J Hypertens. 2016 Jun;34(6):1140-50
pubmed: 26855018
Hypertension. 2009 Jul;54(1):3-10
pubmed: 19487587
J Hypertens. 2019 Aug;37(8):1574-1586
pubmed: 30882593
Dis Model Mech. 2009 May-Jun;2(5-6):231-7
pubmed: 19407331
J Hypertens. 2011 Oct;29(10):1847-53
pubmed: 21799443
Blood Press. 2004;13(1):7-13
pubmed: 15083634
Hypertension. 2020 Jun;75(6):1334-1357
pubmed: 32370572
Eur Heart J. 2019 Jul 1;40(25):2006-2017
pubmed: 31041440
Am J Hypertens. 2007 Jan;20(1):90-7
pubmed: 17198918
Clin Drug Investig. 2016 Oct;36(10):819-27
pubmed: 27405983
Diabetes Care. 2018 Jan;41(Suppl 1):S86-S104
pubmed: 29222380
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2015 Apr;22(4):486-91
pubmed: 24647805
Prev Chronic Dis. 2017 Mar 16;14:E24
pubmed: 28301314
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 May 15;71(19):e127-e248
pubmed: 29146535
Diabetes Care. 2020 Feb;43(2):487-493
pubmed: 31857443
Am J Hypertens. 2004 Oct;17(10):904-10
pubmed: 15485752
J Hypertens. 2015 Mar;33(3):425-34
pubmed: 25629358
J Hypertens. 2018 Jul;36(7):1427-1440
pubmed: 29634663
Curr Hypertens Rep. 2015 Jun;17(6):558
pubmed: 25916862
J Hypertens. 2018 Oct;36(10):1953-2041
pubmed: 30234752
Lancet. 2012 Aug 11;380(9841):601-10
pubmed: 22883509
Semin Nephrol. 2013 Jan;33(1):66-74
pubmed: 23374895