CSF dynamics as a predictor of cognitive progression.
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Brain
/ diagnostic imaging
Cerebral Ventricles
/ diagnostic imaging
Cerebrospinal Fluid
/ physiology
Cerebrospinal Fluid Pressure
/ physiology
Cognitive Dysfunction
/ diagnostic imaging
Cohort Studies
Disease Progression
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Hydrocephalus
/ diagnostic imaging
Longitudinal Studies
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
/ methods
Male
Predictive Value of Tests
Pulsatile Flow
/ physiology
Subarachnoid Space
/ diagnostic imaging
Cognitive impairment
Disproportionately enlarged subarachnoid-space hydrocephalus
MRI
Journal
NeuroImage
ISSN: 1095-9572
Titre abrégé: Neuroimage
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9215515
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
15 05 2021
15 05 2021
Historique:
received:
14
01
2021
accepted:
17
02
2021
pubmed:
26
2
2021
medline:
15
10
2021
entrez:
25
2
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Disproportionately enlarged subarachnoid-space hydrocephalus (DESH), characterized by tight high convexity CSF spaces, ventriculomegaly, and enlarged Sylvian fissures, is thought to be an indirect marker of a CSF dynamics disorder. The clinical significance of DESH with regard to cognitive decline in a community setting is not yet well defined. The goal of this work is to determine if DESH is associated with cognitive decline. Participants in the population-based Mayo Clinic Study of Aging (MCSA) who met the following criteria were included: age ≥ 65 years, 3T MRI, and diagnosis of cognitively unimpaired or mild cognitive impairment at enrollment as well as at least one follow-up visit with cognitive testing. A support vector machine based method to detect the DESH imaging features on T1-weighted MRI was used to calculate a "DESH score", with positive scores indicating a more DESH-like imaging pattern. For the participants who were cognitively unimpaired at enrollment, a Cox proportional hazards model was fit with time defined as years from enrollment to first diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment or dementia, or as years to last known cognitively unimpaired diagnosis for those who did not progress. Linear mixed effects models were fit among all participants to estimate annual change in cognitive z scores for each domain (memory, attention, language, and visuospatial) and a global z score. For all models, covariates included age, sex, education, APOE genotype, cortical thickness, white matter hyperintensity volume, and total intracranial volume. The hazard of progression to cognitive impairment was an estimated 12% greater for a DESH score of +1 versus -1 (HR 1.12, 95% CI 0.97-1.31, p = 0.11). Global and attention cognition declined 0.015 (95% CI 0.005-0.025) and 0.016 (95% CI 0.005-0.028) z/year more, respectively, for a DESH score of +1 vs -1 (p = 0.01 and p = 0.02), with similar, though not statistically significant DESH effects in the other cognitive domains. Imaging features of disordered CSF dynamics are an independent predictor of subsequent cognitive decline in the MCSA, among other well-known factors including age, cortical thickness, and APOE status. Therefore, since DESH contributes to cognitive decline and is present in the general population, identifying individuals with DESH features may be important clinically as well as for selection in clinical trials.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33631332
pii: S1053-8119(21)00176-2
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.117899
pmc: PMC8237937
mid: NIHMS1714817
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
117899Subventions
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : R01 AG041851
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : R01 AG056366
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : R01 AG011378
Pays : United States
Organisme : NINDS NIH HHS
ID : R01 NS097495
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : R37 AG011378
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : U01 AG006786
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Competing Interest C.R.J. serves on an independent data monitoring board for Roche and has consulted for Eisai, but he receives no personal compensation from any commercial entity. He receives research support from NIH and the Alexander Family Alzheimer's Disease Research Professorship of the Mayo Clinic. D.T.J. receives funding from the NIH and the Minnesota Partnership for Biotechnology and Medical Genomics. D.S.K. served on a Data Safety Monitoring Board for the DIAN study. He serves on a Data Safety Monitoring Board for a tau therapeutic for Biogen, but receives no personal compensation. He is an investigator in clinical trials sponsored by Biogen, Lilly Pharmaceuticals, and the University of Southern California. He serves as a consultant for Samus Therapeutics, Third Rock, and Alzeca Biosciences but receives no personal compensation. He receives research support from the NIH. R.C.P. has consulted for Roche, Inc.; Merck, Inc.; Biogen, Inc.; Eisai, Inc. and is on a Data and Safety Monitoring Committee for Genentech, Inc. He receives research support from the National Institute on Aging, the GHR Foundation, and the Alzheimer's Association. J.G-R. receives research support from the NIH. C.G.S. receives research support from the NIH. M.L.S. has owned shares of the following medical related stocks, unrelated to the current work: Align Technology, Inc., LHC Group, Inc., Mesa Laboratories, Inc., Natus Medical Incorporated, Varex Imaging Corporation, CRISPR Therapeutics, Gilead Sciences, Inc., Globus Medical Inc., Inovio Biomedical Corp., Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Johnson & Johnson, Medtronic, Inc., Parexel International Corporation. P.M.C., J.L.G., H.J.W., and S.D.W. report no competing interests.
Références
Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2018 Jan-Mar;32(1):50-56
pubmed: 28984639
J Intern Med. 2004 Sep;256(3):183-94
pubmed: 15324362
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2004 Mar;59(3):268-74
pubmed: 15031312
Neurology. 2013 Mar 5;80(10):911-8
pubmed: 23408873
Neuroepidemiology. 2008;30(1):58-69
pubmed: 18259084
Cerebrospinal Fluid Res. 2010 Oct 31;7:18
pubmed: 21040519
Neuroinformatics. 2020 Jun;18(3):429-449
pubmed: 32062817
Res Aging. 2007 Jan 1;29(1):73-94
pubmed: 19830260
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2016 Oct;37(10):1831-1837
pubmed: 27365329
Neurology. 2014 Apr 22;82(16):1449-54
pubmed: 24682964
Alzheimers Dement. 2017 Mar;13(3):205-216
pubmed: 27697430
J Alzheimers Dis. 2020;73(2):759-768
pubmed: 31839612
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1998 Aug;19(7):1277-84
pubmed: 9726467
N Engl J Med. 1965 Jul 15;273:117-26
pubmed: 14303656
Arch Neurol. 1994 Dec;51(12):1198-204
pubmed: 7986174
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1991 Jan-Feb;12(1):31-9
pubmed: 1899515
Neurology. 2009 Feb 3;72(5):460-5
pubmed: 19188578
Mayo Clin Proc. 2014 Oct;89(10):1336-49
pubmed: 25220409
Neuroimage Clin. 2019;21:101605
pubmed: 30497983
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Sep 26;97(20):11050-5
pubmed: 10984517
Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2008 May;48(5):197-99; discussion 199-200
pubmed: 18497491
Arch Neurol. 2006 Feb;63(2):246-50
pubmed: 16476813
Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2017 Sep 05;10:12-21
pubmed: 29159265
J Neurol Sci. 2020 Jan 15;408:116510
pubmed: 31810041
Neurology. 2019 Dec 10;93(24):e2237-e2246
pubmed: 31719134