The Quality of Life and Economic Burden of Erectile Dysfunction.

absenteeism burden economics erectile dysfunction quality of life sexual dysfunction sexual partners work productivity

Journal

Research and reports in urology
ISSN: 2253-2447
Titre abrégé: Res Rep Urol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101576971

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2021
Historique:
received: 21 09 2020
accepted: 22 01 2021
entrez: 26 2 2021
pubmed: 27 2 2021
medline: 27 2 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Erectile dysfunction (ED) is a common disorder in adult males that results in withdrawal from sexual intimacy, psychosocial problems (ie, poor self-esteem, depression, anxiety), decreased work productivity, and reduction in quality of life for both the men suffering from ED and their female partners. A pragmatic literature review was undertaken using PUBMED to identify original research studies published over the past 20 years that assessed the impact of ED on a male's quality of life, the impact of ED on a female partner's quality of life, or the economic impact of ED on employers. Twenty studies were selected for inclusion. This review showed that men with ED have a poorer quality of life than men without ED (n=9 studies). Results from a global burden of illness study showed that men with ED report substantially lower SF-36 Mental and Physical Component Summary scores and SF-6D scores compared to men without ED (p<0.001). Similarly, the partner is also negatively impacted by ED due to relationship difficulties and decreased sexual satisfaction (n=8 studies). Results from the Female Experience of Men's Attitudes to Life Events and Sexuality study showed that females were significantly less satisfied and engaged in sexual activity less frequently after their partner developed ED (p<0.001). ED also poses a substantial economic burden on employers (n=3 studies). An observational study in men aged 40-70 showed that men with ED had significantly higher rates of absenteeism (2x) and work productivity impairment compared to men without ED (p<0.001). Overall, this contemporary review demonstrated that ED imposes a substantial quality of life burden on men and their female partners as well as a significant economic burden on their employers. These findings underscore the need for more education and awareness of the burden of ED and greater access to appropriate ED treatments to help alleviate this burden.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33634039
doi: 10.2147/RRU.S283097
pii: 283097
pmc: PMC7901407
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Pagination

79-86

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn

Informations de copyright

© 2021 Elterman et al.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Dr. Dean Elterman: Clinical consultant for Boston Scientific; Dr. Samir Bhattacharyya: Employee of Boston Scientific Corporation; Michael Mafilios: Employee of Health Economics Associates which was contracted to conduct the literature review; Emily Woodward: Employee of Boston Scientific Corporation; Krista Nitschelm: Employee of Boston Scientific Corporation; Dr. Arthur Burnett: Reports grants from Boston Scientific, Andrology (journal), Astellas, Comphya, Futura Medical, International Urology and Nephrology (journal), Lilly LLC, Myriad Genetics, National Institutes of Health, New England Research Institute, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Pfizer, Reflexonic LLC, UroMissionsWorks Inc., Urology Times Editorial Council, and personal fees from MHN Biotec, during the conduct of the study.

Références

J Gen Intern Med. 1998 Mar;13(3):159-66
pubmed: 9541372
Int J Impot Res. 2006 Jan-Feb;18(1):44-6
pubmed: 16049524
Age Ageing. 2012 Mar;41(2):177-83
pubmed: 22146130
J Sex Marital Ther. 2016;42(3):214-22
pubmed: 25514566
Sex Med Rev. 2020 Jan;8(1):48-58
pubmed: 31416758
J Urol. 1994 Jan;151(1):54-61
pubmed: 8254833
Nat Rev Urol. 2016 Mar;13(3):168-77
pubmed: 26832165
Int J Impot Res. 2000 Oct;12 Suppl 4:S144-6
pubmed: 11035403
J Sex Med. 2008 Apr;5(4):788-795
pubmed: 18284556
Pharmacoeconomics. 1999 Dec;16(6):699-709
pubmed: 10724796
J Sex Med. 2018 Aug;15(8):1073-1082
pubmed: 29960891
Int J Clin Pract. 2019 Nov;73(11):e13384
pubmed: 31389146
Eur Urol. 2003 Aug;44(2):245-53
pubmed: 12875945
Am J Med. 2007 Feb;120(2):151-7
pubmed: 17275456
J Sex Med. 2013 Feb;10(2):420-9
pubmed: 23171282
J Urol. 2018 Sep;200(3):633-641
pubmed: 29746858
J Sex Med. 2012 Jun;9(6):1497-507
pubmed: 22462756
BJU Int. 2019 Jul 2;:
pubmed: 31267639
BJU Int. 2005 Mar;95(4):609-14
pubmed: 15705089
J Sex Med. 2014 Jan;11(1):40-50
pubmed: 24314303
J Sex Med. 2005 Sep;2(5):675-84
pubmed: 16422826
J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Oct;62(10):e1-34
pubmed: 19631507
Int J Clin Pract. 2000 May;54(4):220-4
pubmed: 10912309
Urology. 2004 Nov;64(5):991-7
pubmed: 15533492
Pharmacoeconomics. 2002;20(2):109-17
pubmed: 11888363
J Sex Marital Ther. 2004 Oct-Dec;30(5):333-41
pubmed: 15672601

Auteurs

Dean S Elterman (DS)

University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Samir K Bhattacharyya (SK)

Boston Scientific Corporation, Marlborough, MA, USA.

Michael Mafilios (M)

Health Economics Associates, San Diego, CA, USA.

Emily Woodward (E)

Boston Scientific Corporation, Marlborough, MA, USA.

Krista Nitschelm (K)

Boston Scientific Corporation, Marlborough, MA, USA.

Arthur L Burnett (AL)

The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Classifications MeSH