DUCT reveals architectural mechanisms contributing to bile duct recovery in a mouse model for Alagille syndrome.
Alagille syndrome
MicroCT
cholangiopathy
human
mouse
physics of living systems
regenerative medicine
resin
stem cells
vasculature
Journal
eLife
ISSN: 2050-084X
Titre abrégé: Elife
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101579614
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
26 02 2021
26 02 2021
Historique:
received:
09
07
2020
accepted:
14
01
2021
entrez:
26
2
2021
pubmed:
27
2
2021
medline:
29
1
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Organ function depends on tissues adopting the correct architecture. However, insights into organ architecture are currently hampered by an absence of standardized quantitative 3D analysis. We aimed to develop a robust technology to visualize, digitalize, and segment the architecture of two tubular systems in 3D: Many essential parts of the body contain tubes: the liver for example, contains bile ducts and blood vessels. These tubes develop right next to each other, like entwined trees. To do their jobs, these ducts must communicate and collaborate, but they do not always grow properly. For example, babies with Alagille syndrome are born with few or no bile ducts, resulting in serious liver disease. Understanding the architecture of the tubes in their livers could explain why some children with this syndrome improve with time, but many others need a liver transplant. Visualising biological tubes in three dimensions is challenging. One major roadblock is the difficulty in seeing several tubular structures at once. Traditional microscopic imaging of anatomy is in two dimensions, using slices of tissue. This approach shows the cross-sections of tubes, but not how the ducts connect and interact. An alternative is to use micro computed tomography scans, which use X-rays to examine structures in three dimensions. The challenge with this approach is that soft tissues, which tubes in the body are made of, do not show up well on X-ray. One way to solve this is to fill the ducts with X-ray absorbing resins, making a cast of the entire tree structure. The question is, can two closely connected tree structures be distinguished if they are cast at the same time? To address this question, Hankeova, Salplachta et al. developed a technique called double resin casting micro computed tomography, or DUCT for short. The approach involved making casts of tube systems using two types of resin that show up differently under X-rays. The new technique was tested on a mouse model of Alagille syndrome. One resin was injected into the bile ducts, and another into the blood vessels. This allowed Hankeova, Salplachta et al. to reconstruction both trees digitally, revealing their length, volume, branching, and interactions. In healthy mice, the bile ducts were straight with uniform branches, but in mice with Alagille syndrome ducts were wiggly, and had extra branches in the centre of the liver. This new imaging technique could improve the understanding of tube systems in animal models of diseases, both in the liver and in other organs with tubes, such as the lungs or the kidneys. Hankeova, Salplachta et al. also lay a foundation for a deeper understanding of bile duct recovery in Alagille syndrome. In the future, DUCT could help researchers to see how mouse bile ducts change in response to experimental therapies.
Autres résumés
Type: plain-language-summary
(eng)
Many essential parts of the body contain tubes: the liver for example, contains bile ducts and blood vessels. These tubes develop right next to each other, like entwined trees. To do their jobs, these ducts must communicate and collaborate, but they do not always grow properly. For example, babies with Alagille syndrome are born with few or no bile ducts, resulting in serious liver disease. Understanding the architecture of the tubes in their livers could explain why some children with this syndrome improve with time, but many others need a liver transplant. Visualising biological tubes in three dimensions is challenging. One major roadblock is the difficulty in seeing several tubular structures at once. Traditional microscopic imaging of anatomy is in two dimensions, using slices of tissue. This approach shows the cross-sections of tubes, but not how the ducts connect and interact. An alternative is to use micro computed tomography scans, which use X-rays to examine structures in three dimensions. The challenge with this approach is that soft tissues, which tubes in the body are made of, do not show up well on X-ray. One way to solve this is to fill the ducts with X-ray absorbing resins, making a cast of the entire tree structure. The question is, can two closely connected tree structures be distinguished if they are cast at the same time? To address this question, Hankeova, Salplachta et al. developed a technique called double resin casting micro computed tomography, or DUCT for short. The approach involved making casts of tube systems using two types of resin that show up differently under X-rays. The new technique was tested on a mouse model of Alagille syndrome. One resin was injected into the bile ducts, and another into the blood vessels. This allowed Hankeova, Salplachta et al. to reconstruction both trees digitally, revealing their length, volume, branching, and interactions. In healthy mice, the bile ducts were straight with uniform branches, but in mice with Alagille syndrome ducts were wiggly, and had extra branches in the centre of the liver. This new imaging technique could improve the understanding of tube systems in animal models of diseases, both in the liver and in other organs with tubes, such as the lungs or the kidneys. Hankeova, Salplachta et al. also lay a foundation for a deeper understanding of bile duct recovery in Alagille syndrome. In the future, DUCT could help researchers to see how mouse bile ducts change in response to experimental therapies.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33635272
doi: 10.7554/eLife.60916
pii: 60916
pmc: PMC7909953
doi:
pii:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© 2021, Hankeova et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
SH, JS, TZ, MK, NV, AB, VS, JL, FD, JJ, VB, UL, EE, AN, BF, EH, JK, EA No competing interests declared
Références
Nat Genet. 1997 Jul;16(3):235-42
pubmed: 9207787
Cell. 2016 Jun 16;165(7):1789-1802
pubmed: 27238021
Acta Paediatr Jpn. 1994 Oct;36(5):506-9
pubmed: 7825452
Gastroenterology. 2018 Mar;154(4):1080-1095
pubmed: 29162437
Minerva Gastroenterol Dietol. 2009 Mar;55(1):79-82
pubmed: 19212310
Am J Hum Genet. 2006 Jul;79(1):169-73
pubmed: 16773578
Hepatology. 2015 Jun;61(6):2056-66
pubmed: 25572923
Am J Pathol. 2003 Apr;162(4):1175-82
pubmed: 12651609
Front Aging Neurosci. 2014 Mar 13;6:32
pubmed: 24659966
Cells Tissues Organs. 2011;194(5):431-42
pubmed: 21494011
J Clin Ultrasound. 2007 Mar-Apr;35(3):156-8
pubmed: 17295271
Nature. 2018 May;557(7704):247-251
pubmed: 29720662
Am J Pathol. 2007 Aug;171(2):641-53
pubmed: 17600123
J Hepatol. 2018 May;68(5):1049-1062
pubmed: 29339113
Am J Pathol. 2001 Jun;158(6):2079-88
pubmed: 11395385
J Pediatr. 1975 Jan;86(1):63-71
pubmed: 803282
Nat Genet. 1997 Jul;16(3):243-51
pubmed: 9207788
Hepatology. 1982 May-Jun;2(3):350-8
pubmed: 7076119
Gastroenterology. 1990 Aug;99(2):466-77
pubmed: 1694804
Nature. 2013 May 16;497(7449):332-7
pubmed: 23575631
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1978 Aug;102(8):402
pubmed: 580878
Development. 2010 Dec;137(23):4061-72
pubmed: 21062863
Liver Int. 2016 May;36(5):755-60
pubmed: 26201540
J Vis Exp. 2012 Oct 25;(68):e4272
pubmed: 23128398
Cell. 2014 Apr 24;157(3):726-39
pubmed: 24746791
Cell. 2017 Sep 21;171(1):242-255.e27
pubmed: 28938116
Hepatology. 2016 Jul;64(1):175-88
pubmed: 26926046
Microsc Microanal. 2011 Apr;17(2):215-9
pubmed: 21122193
Nat Rev Nephrol. 2016 Dec;12(12):754-767
pubmed: 27818506
Development. 2017 May 15;144(10):1743-1763
pubmed: 28512196
J Bone Miner Res. 2013 Aug;28(8):1837-45
pubmed: 23494896
Kidney Int. 2006 Oct;70(7):1261-8
pubmed: 16883324
Hepatology. 2016 Mar;63(3):951-64
pubmed: 26610202
Hum Mutat. 2019 Dec;40(12):2197-2220
pubmed: 31343788
Ann Intern Med. 1979 Oct;91(4):520-7
pubmed: 484950