Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Receptor Agonist (GLP1RA) Exposure and Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review of Population-Based Observational Studies.
Drug safety
Effectiveness
GLP-1 receptor agonists
Type 2 diabetes
Journal
Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders
ISSN: 1869-6953
Titre abrégé: Diabetes Ther
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101539025
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2021
Apr 2021
Historique:
received:
21
01
2021
accepted:
30
01
2021
pubmed:
27
2
2021
medline:
27
2
2021
entrez:
26
2
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP1RAs) are licensed for the treatment of type 2 diabetes (T2D). They have been shown to be safe (from the cardiovascular (CV) perspective) and effective (in terms of glycaemia, and in some cases, reducing CV events) in extensive randomised controlled trials (RCTs). However, there remain concerns regarding the generalisability of these findings (to those ineligible for RCT participation) and about non-CV safety. For effectiveness, population-based pharmacoepidemiology studies can confirm and extend the findings of RCTs findings to broader populations and explore safety, for which RCTs are not usually powered, in more detail. We did a pre-planned and registered (PROSPERO registration CRD42020165720) systematic review of population-based studies investigating GLP1RA effectiveness and safety, following Meta-analyses Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) guidelines. A total of 22 studies were identified (including 200,148 participants and 396,457 person-years of follow-up) exploring exposure to GLP1RA class, exenatide and liraglutide (the only individual drugs with treatment effect estimates identified) on mortality, cardiovascular disease (CVD), acute pancreatitis (AP), pancreatic cancer (PC), thyroid cancer (TC), acute renal failure (ARF), diabetic retinopathy (DR), breast cancer (BC) and hypoglycaemia. For CV and mortality outcomes, studies confirmed the associated safety of these drugs. For liraglutide, point estimate (PE) range (PER) major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (0.53-0.95) and PER heart failure (0.34-1.22) were similar in direction to the beneficial effect observed in RCTs for MACE but varied widely for heart failure. For safety outcomes, exposure was not associated with AP (PER 0.50-1.17), PC (PER 0.40-1.54), BC (PER 0.90-1.51) or hypoglycaemia (PER 0.59-1.06). Only one study was identified exploring each of TC (no evidence of association, hazard ratio (HR) 1.46, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.98-2.19), renal outcomes (no evidence of association, HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.42-1.41) and DR (no evidence of association, HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.51-0.90). In T2D, GLP1RAs appear safe from the CV perspective and (for liraglutide) may have associated benefit in primary as well as secondary CVD prevention. For non-CV safety, GLP1RA exposure was not associated with an increased risk of AP, PC, BC or hypoglycaemia; the other outcomes had too few studies to draw firm conclusions and should be explored further.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33635502
doi: 10.1007/s13300-021-01021-1
pii: 10.1007/s13300-021-01021-1
pmc: PMC7994483
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Pagination
969-989Références
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2016 Aug;18(8):755-65
pubmed: 27003762
Diabet Med. 1997 Feb;14(2):123-31
pubmed: 9047089
JAMA Intern Med. 2013 Apr 8;173(7):534-9
pubmed: 23440284
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018 Apr;20(4):831-839
pubmed: 29119712
N Engl J Med. 2016 Nov 10;375(19):1834-1844
pubmed: 27633186
Diabetes Metab. 2017 Jun;43(3):211-216
pubmed: 28325589
Diabetes Care. 2010 Feb;33(2):453-5
pubmed: 20103562
N Engl J Med. 2017 Aug 31;377(9):839-848
pubmed: 28854085
Lancet. 2019 Jul 13;394(10193):121-130
pubmed: 31189511
Clin Pharmacokinet. 2015 Jan;54(1):1-21
pubmed: 25331711
Res Synth Methods. 2011 Jun;2(2):110-8
pubmed: 26061679
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2012 Oct;14(10):904-11
pubmed: 22845701
J Pharm Health Care Sci. 2018 Jun 18;4:15
pubmed: 29946474
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2011 Jun;13(6):559-66
pubmed: 21320263
Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2018 Nov 22;11:791-806
pubmed: 30538516
J Card Fail. 2015 Jan;21(1):2-8
pubmed: 25451709
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2012 Jul;14(7):596-600
pubmed: 22268550
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2019 Aug;21(8):1837-1848
pubmed: 30945402
Diabetes Care. 2018 Nov;41(11):2330-2338
pubmed: 30150234
Diabetes Care. 2011 Jan;34(1):90-5
pubmed: 20929995
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jul 2;373(1):11-22
pubmed: 26132939
Diabetes Ther. 2018 Feb;9(1):269-283
pubmed: 29318537
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1998 Jun;52(6):377-84
pubmed: 9764259
N Engl J Med. 2019 Aug 29;381(9):841-851
pubmed: 31185157
Diabet Med. 2012 Nov;29(11):1412-8
pubmed: 22416857
BMJ. 2016 Oct 20;355:i5340
pubmed: 27797785
Diabetes Care. 2010 Nov;33(11):2349-54
pubmed: 20682680
Diabetes Ther. 2017 Dec;8(6):1349-1364
pubmed: 28983857
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2019 Apr;21(4):1037-1042
pubmed: 30474347
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2011 Mar 16;10:22
pubmed: 21410975
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2019 Feb;7(2):106-114
pubmed: 30527909
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2014 Mar;23(3):234-9
pubmed: 24741695
Therapie. 2020 Nov - Dec;75(6):641-647
pubmed: 32418731
N Engl J Med. 2016 Jul 28;375(4):311-22
pubmed: 27295427
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018 Feb;20 Suppl 1:5-21
pubmed: 29364588
N Engl J Med. 2015 Dec 3;373(23):2247-57
pubmed: 26630143
Am Heart J. 2018 Feb;196:18-27
pubmed: 29421011
J Clin Invest. 2000 Aug;106(4):453-8
pubmed: 10953019
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2014 Mar;16(3):273-5
pubmed: 24199745
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2015 Jan 24;14:10
pubmed: 25616979
N Engl J Med. 2017 Sep 28;377(13):1228-1239
pubmed: 28910237
Endocrinology. 2012 Mar;153(3):1538-47
pubmed: 22234463