Diagnostic value of amyloid-PET and tau-PET: a head-to-head comparison.
Amyloid
Florbetapir
Flortaucipir
Flutemetamol
PET
Tau
Journal
European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging
ISSN: 1619-7089
Titre abrégé: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101140988
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 2021
07 2021
Historique:
received:
28
10
2020
accepted:
07
02
2021
pubmed:
28
2
2021
medline:
29
6
2021
entrez:
27
2
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Assess the individual and combined diagnostic value of amyloid-PET and tau-PET in a memory clinic population. Clinical reports of 136 patients were randomly assigned to two diagnostic pathways: AMY-TAU, amyloid-PET is presented before tau-PET; and TAU-AMY, tau-PET is presented before amyloid-PET. Two neurologists independently assessed all reports with a balanced randomized design, and expressed etiological diagnosis and diagnostic confidence (50-100%) three times: (i) at baseline based on the routine diagnostic workup, (ii) after the first exam (amyloid-PET for the AMY-TAU pathway, and tau-PET for the TAU-AMY pathway), and (iii) after the remaining exam. The main outcomes were changes in diagnosis (from AD to non-AD or vice versa) and in diagnostic confidence. Amyloid-PET and tau-PET, when presented as the first exam, resulted in a change of etiological diagnosis in 28% (p = 0.006) and 28% (p < 0.001) of cases, and diagnostic confidence increased by 18% (p < 0.001) and 19% (p < 0.001) respectively, with no differences between exams (p > 0.05). We observed a stronger impact of a negative amyloid-PET versus a negative tau-PET (p = 0.014). When added as the second exam, amyloid-PET and tau-PET resulted in a further change in etiological diagnosis in 6% (p = 0.077) and 9% (p = 0.149) of cases, and diagnostic confidence increased by 4% (p < 0.001) and 5% (p < 0.001) respectively, with no differences between exams (p > 0.05). Amyloid-PET and tau-PET significantly impacted diagnosis and diagnostic confidence in a similar way, although a negative amyloid-PET has a stronger impact on diagnosis than a negative tau-PET. Adding either of the two as second exam further improved diagnostic confidence. PB 2016-01346.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33638661
doi: 10.1007/s00259-021-05246-x
pii: 10.1007/s00259-021-05246-x
pmc: PMC8175315
doi:
Substances chimiques
Amyloid
0
Amyloid beta-Peptides
0
tau Proteins
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2200-2211Subventions
Organisme : EU-EFPIA Innovative Medicines Initiatives 2 Joint Undertaking (IMI 2 JU)
ID : 115952
Organisme : Swiss National Science Foundation
ID : 320030_169876
Pays : Switzerland
Organisme : Swiss National Science Foundation
ID : 320030_185028
Pays : Switzerland
Références
Villemagne VL, Doré V, Burnham SC, Masters CL, Rowe CC. Imaging tau and amyloid-β proteinopathies in Alzheimer disease and other conditions. Nat Rev Neurol. 2018;14:225–36. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneurol.2018.9 .
doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2018.9
pubmed: 29449700
Dubois B, Hampel H, Feldman HH, Scheltens P, Aisen P, Andrieu S, et al. Preclinical Alzheimer’s disease: definition, natural history, and diagnostic criteria. Alzheimers Dement. 2016;12:292–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2016.02.002 .
doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2016.02.002
pubmed: 27012484
pmcid: 6417794
Jack CR, Bennett DA, Blennow K, Carrillo MC, Dunn B, Haeberlein SB, et al. NIA-AA research framework: toward a biological definition of Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2018;14:535–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2018.02.018 .
doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2018.02.018
pubmed: 29653606
pmcid: 5958625
Klunk WE, Engler H, Nordberg A, Wang Y, Blomqvist G, Holt DP, et al. Imaging brain amyloid in Alzheimer’s disease with Pittsburgh compound-B. Ann Neurol. 2004;55:306–19. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.20009 .
doi: 10.1002/ana.20009
pubmed: 14991808
Barthel H, Sabri O. Clinical use and utility of amyloid imaging. J Nucl Med. 2017;58:1711–7. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.116.185017 .
doi: 10.2967/jnumed.116.185017
pubmed: 28818990
Chien DT, Bahri S, Szardenings AK, Walsh JC, Mu F, Su MY, et al. Early clinical PET imaging results with the novel PHF-tau radioligand [F-18]-T807. J Alzheimers Dis. 2013;34:457–68. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-122059 .
doi: 10.3233/JAD-122059
pubmed: 23234879
Wolters EE, A. Dodich A, Boccardi M, Corre j, Drzezga A, Hansson O et al. Clinical validity of increased cortical uptake of [18F]flortaucipir on PET as a biomarker for Alzheimer’s disease in the context of a structured 5-phase biomarker development framework. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-020-05118-w
FDA Approves First Drug to Image Tau Pathology in Patients Being Evaluated for Alzheimer’s Disease | FDA n.d. https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-approves-first-drug-image-tau-pathology-patients-being-evaluated-alzheimers-disease (accessed September 7, 2020).
Ramusino MC, Garibotto V, Bacchin R, Altomare D, Dodich A, Assal F, et al. Incremental value of amyloid-PET versus CSF in the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2020;47:270–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-019-04466-6 .
doi: 10.1007/s00259-019-04466-6
pubmed: 31388720
Jessen F, Amariglio RE, Buckley RF, van der Flier WM, Han Y, Molinuevo JL, et al. The characterisation of subjective cognitive decline. Lancet Neurol. 2020;19:271–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30368-0 .
doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30368-0
pubmed: 31958406
pmcid: 7062546
Albert MS, DeKosky ST, Dickson D, Dubois B, Feldman HH, Fox NC, et al. The diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer’s disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2011;7:270–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2011.03.008 .
doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2011.03.008
pubmed: 21514249
pmcid: 3312027
McKhann GM, Knopman DS, Chertkow H, Hyman BT, Jack CR, Kawas CH, et al. The diagnosis of dementia due to Alzheimer’s disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2011;7:263–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2011.03.005 .
doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2011.03.005
pubmed: 21514250
pmcid: 3312024
Chui HC, Mack W, Jackson JE, Mungas D, Reed BR, Tinklenberg J, et al. Clinical criteria for the diagnosis of vascular dementia: a multicenter study of comparability and interrater reliability. Arch Neurol. 2000;57:191–6. https://doi.org/10.1001/archneur.57.2.191 .
doi: 10.1001/archneur.57.2.191
pubmed: 10681076
Román GC, Tatemichi TK, Erkinjuntti T, Cummings JL, Masdeu JC, Garcia JH, et al. Vascular dementia: diagnostic criteria for research studies: report of the ninds-airen international workshop*. Neurology. 1993;43:250–60. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.43.2.250 .
doi: 10.1212/wnl.43.2.250
pubmed: 8094895
Erkinjuntti T, Inzitari D, Pantoni L, Wallin A, Scheltens P, Rockwood K, et al. Research criteria for subcortical vascular dementia in clinical trials. J Neural Transm Suppl. 2000;59:23–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-6781-6_4 .
doi: 10.1007/978-3-7091-6781-6_4
pubmed: 10961414
Rascovsky K, Hodges JR, Knopman D, Mendez MF, Kramer JH, Neuhaus J, et al. Sensitivity of revised diagnostic criteria for the behavioural variant of frontotemporal dementia. Brain. 2011;134:2456–77. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awr179 .
doi: 10.1093/brain/awr179
pubmed: 21810890
pmcid: 21810890
McKeith IG, Dickson DW, Lowe J, Emre M, O’Brien JT, Feldman H, et al. Diagnosis and management of dementia with Lewy bodies: third report of the DLB consortium. Neurology. 2005;65:1863–72. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000187889.17253.b1 .
doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000187889.17253.b1
pubmed: 16237129
Jack CR, Knopman DS, Weigand SD, Wiste HJ, Vemuri P, Lowe V, et al. An operational approach to National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association criteria for preclinical Alzheimer disease. Ann Neurol. 2012;71:765–75. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.22628 .
doi: 10.1002/ana.22628
pubmed: 22488240
pmcid: 3586223
Jack CR, Knopman DS, Chételat G, Dickson D, Fagan AM, Frisoni GB, et al. Suspected non-Alzheimer disease pathophysiology-concept and controversy. Nat Rev Neurol. 2016;12:117–24. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneurol.2015.251 .
doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2015.251
pubmed: 26782335
pmcid: 4784257
Shcherbinin S, Schwarz AJ, Joshi A, Navitsky M, Flitter M, Shankle WR, et al. Kinetics of the tau PET tracer 18F-AV-1451 (T807) in subjects with normal cognitive function, mild cognitive impairment, and Alzheimer disease. J Nucl Med. 2016;57:1535–42. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.115.170027 .
doi: 10.2967/jnumed.115.170027
pubmed: 27151986
Vizamyl - European Medicines Agency - Summary of Product Characteristics n.d. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/product-information/vizamyl-epar-product-information_en.pdf (accessed October 13, 2020).
Amyvid - European Medicines Agency - Summary of Product Characteristics n.d. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/product-information/amyvid-epar-product-information_en.pdf (accessed October 13, 2020).
Fleisher AS, Pontecorvo MJ, Devous MD, Lu M, Arora AK, Truocchio SP, et al. Positron emission tomography imaging with [18F] flortaucipir and postmortem assessment of Alzheimer disease neuropathologic changes. JAMA Neurol. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.0528 .
Dodich A, Rochat A-S, Mainta I, Noirot C, Andryszak P, Rakotomiaramanana B, et al. Validation of a visual assessment strategy for 18F-Flortaucipir PET. EANM. 2019;19.
Gold G, Bouras C, Kövari E, Canuto A, Glaría BG, Malky A, et al. Clinical validity of Braak neuropathological staging in the oldest-old. Acta Neuropathol. 2000;99:579–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004010051163 .
doi: 10.1007/s004010051163
pubmed: 10805104
Lowe VJ, Lundt ES, Albertson SM, Min HK, Fang P, Przybelski SA, et al. Tau-positron emission tomography correlates with neuropathology findings. Alzheimers Dement. 2020;16:561–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2019.09.079 .
doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2019.09.079
pubmed: 31784374
pmcid: 7067654
Sonni I, Lesman Segev OH, Baker SL, Iaccarino L, Korman D, Rabinovici GD, et al. Evaluation of a visual interpretation method for tau-PET with 18 F-flortaucipir. Alzheimer’s Dement Diagnosis, Assess Dis Monit. 2020;12. https://doi.org/10.1002/dad2.12133 .
Frisoni GB, Barkhof F, Altomare D, Berkhof J, Boccardi M, Canzoneri E, et al. AMYPAD diagnostic and patient management study: rationale and design. Alzheimers Dement. 2019;15:388–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2018.09.003 .
doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2018.09.003
pubmed: 30339801
Aschenbrenner AJ, Gordon BA, Benzinger TLS, Morris JC, Hassenstab JJ. Influence of tau PET, amyloid PET, and hippocampal volume on cognition in Alzheimer disease. Neurology. 2018;91:e859–66. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000006075 .
doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000006075
pubmed: 30068637
pmcid: 6133625
Mufson EJ, Malek-Ahmadi M, Snyder N, Ausdemore J, Chen K, Perez SE. Braak stage and trajectory of cognitive decline in noncognitively impaired elders. Neurobiol Aging. 2016;43:101–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2016.03.003 .
doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2016.03.003
pubmed: 27255819
pmcid: 4894536
Ossenkoppele R, Smith R, Ohlsson T, Strandberg O, Mattsson N, Insel PS, et al. Associations between tau, Aβ, and cortical thickness with cognition in Alzheimer disease. Neurology. 2019;92:e601–12. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000006875 .
doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000006875
pubmed: 30626656
pmcid: 6382060
Bennett DA, Schneider JA, Wilson RS, Bienias JL, Arnold SE. Neurofibrillary tangles mediate the association of amyloid load with clinical Alzheimer disease and level of cognitive function. Arch Neurol. 2004;61:378–84. https://doi.org/10.1001/archneur.61.3.378 .
doi: 10.1001/archneur.61.3.378
pubmed: 15023815
Hammes J, Bischof G, Bohn K, Onur O, Schneider A, Fliessbach K, et al. One stop shop: flortaucipir PET differentiates amyloid positive and negative forms of neurodegenerative diseases. J Nucl Med. 2020. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.120.244061 .
Xia C, Makaretz SJ, Caso C, McGinnis S, Gomperts SN, Sepulcre J, et al. Association of in vivo [18F]AV-1451 tau PET imaging results with cortical atrophy and symptoms in typical and atypical Alzheimer disease. JAMA Neurol. 2017;74:427–36. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2016.5755 .
doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2016.5755
pubmed: 28241163
pmcid: 5470368
Van Eimeren T, Bischof GN, Drzezga A. Is tau imaging more than just upside-down 18F-FDG imaging? J Nucl Med. 2017;58:1357–9. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.117.190082 .
doi: 10.2967/jnumed.117.190082
pubmed: 28490468
Chiotis K, Saint-Aubert L, Rodriguez-Vieitez E, Leuzy A, Almkvist O, Savitcheva I, et al. Longitudinal changes of tau PET imaging in relation to hypometabolism in prodromal and Alzheimer’s disease dementia. Mol Psychiatry. 2018;23:1666–73. https://doi.org/10.1038/mp.2017.108 .
doi: 10.1038/mp.2017.108
pubmed: 28507319
Jack CR, Knopman DS, Jagust WJ, Petersen RC, Weiner MW, Aisen PS, et al. Tracking pathophysiological processes in Alzheimer’s disease: an updated hypothetical model of dynamic biomarkers. Lancet Neurol. 2013;12:207–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70291-0 .
doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70291-0
pubmed: 23332364
pmcid: 3622225
Tsai RM, Bejanin A, Lesman-Segev O, Lajoie R, Visani A, Bourakova V, et al. 18F-flortaucipir (AV-1451) tau PET in frontotemporal dementia syndromes. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2019;11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13195-019-0470-7 .
Boccardi M, Dodich A, Albanese E, Gayet‐Ageron A, Walter M, Rabinovici GD, et al. The biomarker roadmap for the validation for Alzheimer’s biomarkers: Methodological update for biomarkers of tauopathy. Alzheimers Dement. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.039063 .