A tailored approach to abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer: multicentre analysis of short-term outcomes and impact on oncological survival.
APR
Cancer
Rectum
Tailored
Journal
Langenbeck's archives of surgery
ISSN: 1435-2451
Titre abrégé: Langenbecks Arch Surg
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9808285
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
May 2021
May 2021
Historique:
received:
24
06
2020
accepted:
08
02
2021
pubmed:
28
2
2021
medline:
25
9
2021
entrez:
27
2
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Abdominoperineal resection of the rectum has evolved over the last century, with few modifications until 2007, when extralevator abdominoperineal resection was introduced, which improved local disease control but resulted in a significant rise in perineal complications. We adopted a modified approach in which dissection was tailored according to magnetic resonance-defined tumour involvement. The aim of this study was to assess short-term and long-term oncological outcomes following a tailored abdominoperineal resection (APR) approach. This study was a retrospective review of prospectively maintained databases at three centres: Portsmouth NHS Trust (UK), Poole General Hospital (UK) and Champalimaud's Cancer Foundation, Portugal. The study included consecutive patients who underwent abdominoperineal resection from October 2008 until April 2018 under the supervision of the senior author. Oncological outcomes, including overall survival and disease-free survival, were used as the main outcome measures. A total of 584 patients underwent rectal cancer surgery during the study period. The APR ratio was 65/584 (11%). The median age was 66 years. Neoadjuvant treatment was administered to 74% of patients. Of the patients, 91% underwent surgery via a minimally invasive approach. The median hospital stay was 7 days. Patients were followed up for a median of 41 months. Only four patients had positive resection margins. The 5-year overall and disease-free survival rates were 64% and 62%, respectively. Our data suggest that tailored APR has similar short-term and long-term oncological outcomes compared with extralevator abdominoperineal resection but reduced perineal wound complications. We believe this approach could be a safe alternative but recommend a larger sample size to accurately assess its effectiveness.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33638682
doi: 10.1007/s00423-021-02122-y
pii: 10.1007/s00423-021-02122-y
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
813-819Références
Perry WB, Connaughton JC (2007) Abdominoperineal resection: how is it done and what are the results? Clin Colon Rectal Surg 20:213–220. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-984865
doi: 10.1055/s-2007-984865
pubmed: 20011202
pmcid: 2789508
Miles WE (1908) A method of performing abdomino-perineal excision for carcinoma of the rectum and of the terminal portion of the pelvic colon. CA Cancer J Clin 21:361–364. https://doi.org/10.3322/canjclin.21.6.361
doi: 10.3322/canjclin.21.6.361
Näsvall P, Dahlstrand U, Löwenmark T, Rutegård J, Gunnarsson U, Strigård K (2017) Quality of life in patients with a permanent stoma after rectal cancer surgery. Qual Life Res 26:55–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-016-1367-6
doi: 10.1007/s11136-016-1367-6
pubmed: 27444778
Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H et al (2005) Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 365:1718–1726. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66545-2
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66545-2
pubmed: 15894098
Morris EJA, Birch R, West NP, Finan PJ, Forman D, Fairley L, Quirke P (2011) Low abdominoperineal excision rates are associated with high-workload surgeons and lower tumour height. Is further specialization needed? Colorectal Dis 13:755–761. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-1318.2010.02263.x
doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2010.02263.x
pubmed: 20236155
Tekkis PP, Heriot AG, Smith J, Thompson MR, Finan P, Stamatakis JD, the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland (2005) Comparison of circumferential margin involvement between restorative and nonrestorative resections for rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 7:369–374. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-1318.2005.00767.x
doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2005.00767.x
pubmed: 15932561
Heald RJ, Smedh RK, Kald A et al (1997) Abdominoperineal excision of the rectum--an endangered operation. Norman Nigro Lectureship. Dis Colon Rectum 40:747–751. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02055425
doi: 10.1007/BF02055425
pubmed: 9221846
Quirke P, Steele R, Monson J et al (2009) Effect of the plane of surgery achieved on local recurrence in patients with operable rectal cancer: a prospective study using data from the MRC CR07 and NCIC-CTG CO16 randomised clinical trial. Lancet 373:821–828. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60485-2
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60485-2
pubmed: 19269520
pmcid: 2668948
MERCURY Study Group (2007) Extramural depth of tumor invasion at thin-section MR in patients with rectal cancer: results of the MERCURY study. Radiology 243:132–139. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2431051825
doi: 10.1148/radiol.2431051825
Peeters KCMJ, Marijnen CAM, Nagtegaal ID, Kranenbarg EK, Putter H, Wiggers T, Rutten H, Pahlman L, Glimelius B, Leer JW, van de Velde C, Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group (2007) The TME trial after a median follow-up of 6 years: increased local control but no survival benefit in irradiated patients with resectable rectal carcinoma. Ann Surg 246:693–701. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000257358.56863.ce
doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000257358.56863.ce
pubmed: 17968156
Sebag-Montefiore D, Stephens RJ, Steele R et al (2009) Preoperative radiotherapy versus selective postoperative chemoradiotherapy in patients with rectal cancer (MRC CR07 and NCIC-CTG C016): a multicentre, randomised trial. Lancet 373:811–820. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60484-0
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60484-0
pubmed: 19269519
pmcid: 2668947
Holm T, Ljung A, Häggmark T, Jurell G, Lagergren J (2007) Extended abdominoperineal resection with gluteus maximus flap reconstruction of the pelvic floor for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 94:232–238. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.5489
doi: 10.1002/bjs.5489
pubmed: 17143848
West NP, Finan PJ, Anderin C, Lindholm J, Holm T, Quirke P (2008) Evidence of the oncologic superiority of cylindrical abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 26:3517–3522. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2007.14.5961
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.14.5961
pubmed: 18541901
Tayyab M, Sharma A, Ragg JL, Macdonald AW, Gunn J, Hartley JE, Monson JR (2012) Evaluation of the impact of implementing the prone jackknife position for the perineal phase of abdominoperineal excision of the rectum. Dis Colon Rectum 55:316–321. https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0b013e31823e2424
doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e31823e2424
pubmed: 22469799
Sayers AE, Patel RK, Hunter IA (2015) Perineal hernia formation following extralevator abdominoperineal excision. Colorectal Dis 17:351–355. https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.12843
doi: 10.1111/codi.12843
pubmed: 25413255
Miskovic D, Foster J, Agha A, Delaney CP, Francis N, Hasegawa H, Karachun A, Kim SH, Law WL, Marks J, Morino M, Panis Y, Uriburu JCP, Wexner SD, Parvaiz A (2015) Standardization of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a structured international expert consensus. Ann Surg 261:716–722. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000000823
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000823
pubmed: 25072446
Panteleimonitis S, Harper M, Hall S, Figueiredo N, Qureshi T, Parvaiz A (2018) Precision in robotic rectal surgery using the da Vinci Xi system and integrated table motion, a technical note. J Robot Surg 12:433–436. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-017-0752-7
doi: 10.1007/s11701-017-0752-7
pubmed: 28916892
Kehlet H, Wilmore DW (2002) Multimodal strategies to improve surgical outcome. Am J Surg 183:630–641. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9610(02)00866-8
doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(02)00866-8
pubmed: 12095591
Holm T, Rutqvist LE, Johansson H, Cedermark B (1995) Abdominoperineal resection and anterior resection in the treatment of rectal cancer: results in relation to adjuvant preoperative radiotherapy. Br J Surg 82:1213–1216. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800820920
doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800820920
pubmed: 7551999
Lee M-TG, Chiu C-C, Wang C-C, Chang CN, Lee SH, Lee M, Hsu TC, Lee CC (2017) Trends and outcomes of surgical treatment for colorectal cancer between 2004 and 2012-an analysis using national inpatient database. Sci Rep 7:2006. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-02224-y
doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-02224-y
pubmed: 28515452
pmcid: 28515452
Pascual M, Salvans S, Pera M (2016) Laparoscopic colorectal surgery: current status and implementation of the latest technological innovations. World J Gastroenterol 22:704–717. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v22.i2.704
doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i2.704
pubmed: 26811618
pmcid: 4716070
Klein M, Fischer A, Rosenberg J, Gögenur I, Danish Colorectal Cancer Group (DCCG) (2015) Extralevatory abdominoperineal excision (ELAPE) does not result in reduced rate of tumor perforation or rate of positive circumferential resection margin: a nationwide database study. Ann Surg 261:933–938. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000000910
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000910
pubmed: 25211268
Lu S, Chang X, Yang X, Yu D, Huang Q, Wang F (2017) A meta-analysis on risk factors of postoperative perineal wound complications after abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi 20:1180–1187
pubmed: 29130235
Eriksen MT, Wibe A, Syse A, Haffner J, Wiig JN, on behalf of the Norwegian Rectal Cancer Group the Norwegian Gastrointestinal Cancer Group (2004) Inadvertent perforation during rectal cancer resection in Norway. Br J Surg 91:210–216. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.4390
doi: 10.1002/bjs.4390
pubmed: 14760670
Nagtegaal ID, van de Velde CJH, Marijnen CAM, van Krieken J, Quirke P, Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group, Pathology Review Committee (2005) Low rectal cancer: a call for a change of approach in abdominoperineal resection. J Clin Oncol 23:9257–9264. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2005.02.9231
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.02.9231
pubmed: 16361623
den Dulk M, Putter H, Collette L, Marijnen CAM, Folkesson J, Bosset JF, Rödel C, Bujko K, Påhlman L, van de Velde CJH (2009) The abdominoperineal resection itself is associated with an adverse outcome: the European experience based on a pooled analysis of five European randomised clinical trials on rectal cancer. Eur J Cancer 45:1175–1183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2008.11.039
doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.11.039
Shihab OC, Brown G, Daniels IR, Heald RJ, Quirke P, Moran BJ (2010) Patients with low rectal cancer treated by abdominoperineal excision have worse tumors and higher involved margin rates compared with patients treated by anterior resection. Dis Colon Rectum 53:53–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181c70465
doi: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181c70465
pubmed: 20010351
Kusters M, Marijnen CAM, van de Velde CJH, Rutten HJT, Lahaye MJ, Kim JH, Beets-Tan RGH, Beets GL (2010) Patterns of local recurrence in rectal cancer; a study of the Dutch TME trial. Eur J Surg Oncol 36:470–476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2009.11.011
doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2009.11.011
pubmed: 20096534
De Nardi P, Summo V, Vignali A, Capretti G (2015) Standard versus extralevator abdominoperineal low rectal cancer excision outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 22:2997–3006. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-015-4368-8
doi: 10.1245/s10434-015-4368-8
pubmed: 25605518