New Insights Into Understanding Rotor Versus Focal Activation in Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation.


Journal

JACC. Clinical electrophysiology
ISSN: 2405-5018
Titre abrégé: JACC Clin Electrophysiol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101656995

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
07 2021
Historique:
received: 27 07 2020
revised: 09 11 2020
accepted: 01 12 2020
pubmed: 1 3 2021
medline: 26 10 2021
entrez: 28 2 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

This study was to test the hypotheses that: 1) when using phase analysis, repetitive Wannabe re-entry produces a phase singularity point (i.e., a rotor); and 2) the location of the stable rotor is close to the focal source. Recent contact mapping studies in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) demonstrated that phase analysis produced a different mechanistic result than classical activation sequence analysis. Our studies in patients with persistent AF showed that focal sources sometimes produced repetitive Wannabe re-entry, that is, incomplete re-entry. During open heart surgery, we recorded activation from both atria simultaneously using 510 to 512 electrodes in 12 patients with persistent AF. We performed activation sequence mapping and phase analyses on 4 s of mapped data. For each detected stable rotor (>2 full rotations [720°] recurring at the same site), the corresponding activation patterns were examined from the activation sequence maps. During AF, phase singularity points (rotors) were identified in both atria in all patients. However, stable phase singularity points were only present in 6 of 12 patients. The range of stable phase singularity points per patient was 0 to 6 (total 14). Stable phase singularity points were produced due to repetitive Wannabe re-entry generated from a focal source or by passive activation. A conduction block sometimes created a stable phase singularity point (n = 2). The average distance between a focal source and a stable rotor was 0.9 ± 0.3 cm. Repetitive Wannabe re-entry generated stable rotors adjacent to a focal source. No true re-entry occurred.

Sections du résumé

OBJECTIVES
This study was to test the hypotheses that: 1) when using phase analysis, repetitive Wannabe re-entry produces a phase singularity point (i.e., a rotor); and 2) the location of the stable rotor is close to the focal source.
BACKGROUND
Recent contact mapping studies in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) demonstrated that phase analysis produced a different mechanistic result than classical activation sequence analysis. Our studies in patients with persistent AF showed that focal sources sometimes produced repetitive Wannabe re-entry, that is, incomplete re-entry.
METHODS
During open heart surgery, we recorded activation from both atria simultaneously using 510 to 512 electrodes in 12 patients with persistent AF. We performed activation sequence mapping and phase analyses on 4 s of mapped data. For each detected stable rotor (>2 full rotations [720°] recurring at the same site), the corresponding activation patterns were examined from the activation sequence maps.
RESULTS
During AF, phase singularity points (rotors) were identified in both atria in all patients. However, stable phase singularity points were only present in 6 of 12 patients. The range of stable phase singularity points per patient was 0 to 6 (total 14). Stable phase singularity points were produced due to repetitive Wannabe re-entry generated from a focal source or by passive activation. A conduction block sometimes created a stable phase singularity point (n = 2). The average distance between a focal source and a stable rotor was 0.9 ± 0.3 cm.
CONCLUSIONS
Repetitive Wannabe re-entry generated stable rotors adjacent to a focal source. No true re-entry occurred.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33640352
pii: S2405-500X(20)31309-8
doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2020.12.010
pmc: PMC8319037
mid: NIHMS1683698
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

909-919

Subventions

Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : R01 HL146463
Pays : United States

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Funding Support and Author Disclosures This work was supported in part by grants from R01 HL146463 from the National Institutes of Health, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; and by the Elisabeth Severance Prentiss Foundation. The authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.

Références

J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2013 Mar;24(3):328-35
pubmed: 23210508
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2018 Jan;11(1):e005258
pubmed: 29330332
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2013 Feb;24(2):199-206
pubmed: 23140386
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2018 Oct;11(10):e005858
pubmed: 30354409
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2017 May;10(5):e004899
pubmed: 28500175
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2016 Nov;9(11):
pubmed: 27906655
Heart Rhythm. 2016 Apr;13(4):830-5
pubmed: 26706193
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2017 Feb;64(2):310-318
pubmed: 27101596
Circulation. 2014 Aug 12;130(7):530-8
pubmed: 25028391
Cardiovasc Res. 2002 May;54(2):204-16
pubmed: 12062327
Circulation. 2010 Oct 26;122(17):1674-82
pubmed: 20937979
J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Mar 17;6(3):
pubmed: 28314801
JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2018 Jan;4(1):72-83
pubmed: 29600788
Eur Heart J. 2014 Jan;35(2):86-97
pubmed: 23935092
Heart Rhythm. 2012 Sep;9(9):1440-1
pubmed: 22521928
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Mar 14;69(10):1247-1256
pubmed: 28279291
JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2016 Nov;2(6):656-666
pubmed: 29759743
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2015 Jan;62(1):296-302
pubmed: 25148659
Circulation. 2010 Oct 5;122(14):1364-72
pubmed: 20855661
Europace. 2018 Jul 1;20(7):1099-1106
pubmed: 29340595
Heart Rhythm. 2016 Jun;13(6):1215-20
pubmed: 26829116
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2015 Jun;8(3):554-61
pubmed: 25873718
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2020 Jan;13(1):e007825
pubmed: 31944826
Heart Rhythm. 2016 Mar;13(3):636-41
pubmed: 26498260
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2017 Apr;10(4):
pubmed: 28356307
JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2017 Nov;3(11):1220-1228
pubmed: 29759616
Heart Rhythm. 2017 Apr;14(4):608-615
pubmed: 28104480
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Jul 9;62(2):138-147
pubmed: 23563126
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2018 Nov;29(11):1480-1488
pubmed: 30230079
Circulation. 2015 Dec 1;132(22):2108-17
pubmed: 26499963
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Mar 14;69(10):1257-1269
pubmed: 28279292
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2019 Jan;30(1):58-66
pubmed: 30255666
Heart Rhythm. 2020 May;17(5 Pt A):683-691
pubmed: 31991116

Auteurs

Seungyup Lee (S)

Departments of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.

Celeen M Khrestian (CM)

Departments of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.

Jayakumar Sahadevan (J)

Departments of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA; Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.

Alan Markowitz (A)

Valve Center, Harrington Heart and Vascular Institute, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.

Albert L Waldo (AL)

Departments of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA; Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA. Electronic address: Albert.Waldo@case.edu.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH