Combining a Hudl App With Telehealth to Increase Home Exercise Program Adherence in People With Chronic Diseases Experiencing Financial Distress: Randomized Controlled Trial.

chronic disease spinal cord injury stroke telehealth telemedicine traumatic brain injury

Journal

JMIR formative research
ISSN: 2561-326X
Titre abrégé: JMIR Form Res
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101726394

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
18 Mar 2021
Historique:
received: 20 07 2020
accepted: 27 02 2021
revised: 25 09 2020
pubmed: 1 3 2021
medline: 1 3 2021
entrez: 28 2 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Patients with chronic diseases often need to adhere to long-term individualized home exercise programs (HEPs). Limited adherence to long-term exercise given during physical therapy (PT) visits reduces the capacity of exercise to manage or improve symptoms related to chronic disease. In addition, a lower socioeconomic status negatively impacts exercise adherence. To mitigate this, apps that motivate people to exercise could be a viable option. Using an app through telehealth may help adults with chronic diseases to achieve long-term HEP adherence. However, because apps for rehabilitation are an emerging field, the feasibility of the app needs to be evaluated. To address HEP adherence in participants with chronic diseases who are experiencing financial distress, we aim to evaluate the feasibility of and satisfaction with the Hudl Technique app and telehealth and satisfaction with PT care and to monitor HEP adherence and compliance (ie, percentage of participant-recorded videos sent) in participants using the app with telehealth compared with those using standard HEPs on paper. We recruited patients scheduled for outpatient PT. We performed a randomized controlled trial in which the experimental group received weekly HEP demonstrations through app videos on a tablet with feedback on their self-recorded HEP video performance from the telehealth physical therapist. The control group received HEPs on paper without feedback, as is customary in PT practice. Demographic, clinical, and health coverage information was collected for screening and baseline measurements. Adherence and compliance were evaluated. Both groups completed surveys at 8 and 24 weeks on their satisfaction with PT care, and the experimental group also completed a survey on their satisfaction with the app with telehealth use. Descriptive and nonparametric statistics were used for within-group and between-group comparisons and analyzed with JMP, version 13. Overall, 45 adults with chronic diseases who were experiencing financial distress were randomized into experimental (23/45, 51%) and control (22/45, 49%) groups, with 74% (17/23) and 86% (19/22) participants completing the 24-week HEP, respectively. The experimental group had an HEP adherence frequency of 4 (SD 2) to 5 (SD 2) times per week at 8 and 24 weeks (P=.14), whereas HEP adherence decreased in the control group from 4 (SD 2) to 3 (SD 2) times per week (P=.07), with a significant difference (P=.01) between groups at 24 weeks. Of the total participants, 68% (15/22) sent videos. They sent 68% (16/24) of the requested number of videos on average. The average score for PT care satisfaction was maintained at 87% in the experimental group (P=.99), whereas it decreased from 89% at 8 weeks to 74% at 24 weeks (P=.008) in the control group. App-related adverse events were not observed. The Hudl app/telehealth platform is feasible for delivering HEPs and maintaining HEP adherence in participants with chronic diseases who are experiencing financial distress. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02659280; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02659280.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Patients with chronic diseases often need to adhere to long-term individualized home exercise programs (HEPs). Limited adherence to long-term exercise given during physical therapy (PT) visits reduces the capacity of exercise to manage or improve symptoms related to chronic disease. In addition, a lower socioeconomic status negatively impacts exercise adherence. To mitigate this, apps that motivate people to exercise could be a viable option. Using an app through telehealth may help adults with chronic diseases to achieve long-term HEP adherence. However, because apps for rehabilitation are an emerging field, the feasibility of the app needs to be evaluated.
OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
To address HEP adherence in participants with chronic diseases who are experiencing financial distress, we aim to evaluate the feasibility of and satisfaction with the Hudl Technique app and telehealth and satisfaction with PT care and to monitor HEP adherence and compliance (ie, percentage of participant-recorded videos sent) in participants using the app with telehealth compared with those using standard HEPs on paper.
METHODS METHODS
We recruited patients scheduled for outpatient PT. We performed a randomized controlled trial in which the experimental group received weekly HEP demonstrations through app videos on a tablet with feedback on their self-recorded HEP video performance from the telehealth physical therapist. The control group received HEPs on paper without feedback, as is customary in PT practice. Demographic, clinical, and health coverage information was collected for screening and baseline measurements. Adherence and compliance were evaluated. Both groups completed surveys at 8 and 24 weeks on their satisfaction with PT care, and the experimental group also completed a survey on their satisfaction with the app with telehealth use. Descriptive and nonparametric statistics were used for within-group and between-group comparisons and analyzed with JMP, version 13.
RESULTS RESULTS
Overall, 45 adults with chronic diseases who were experiencing financial distress were randomized into experimental (23/45, 51%) and control (22/45, 49%) groups, with 74% (17/23) and 86% (19/22) participants completing the 24-week HEP, respectively. The experimental group had an HEP adherence frequency of 4 (SD 2) to 5 (SD 2) times per week at 8 and 24 weeks (P=.14), whereas HEP adherence decreased in the control group from 4 (SD 2) to 3 (SD 2) times per week (P=.07), with a significant difference (P=.01) between groups at 24 weeks. Of the total participants, 68% (15/22) sent videos. They sent 68% (16/24) of the requested number of videos on average. The average score for PT care satisfaction was maintained at 87% in the experimental group (P=.99), whereas it decreased from 89% at 8 weeks to 74% at 24 weeks (P=.008) in the control group. App-related adverse events were not observed.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
The Hudl app/telehealth platform is feasible for delivering HEPs and maintaining HEP adherence in participants with chronic diseases who are experiencing financial distress.
TRIAL REGISTRATION BACKGROUND
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02659280; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02659280.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33640865
pii: v5i3e22659
doi: 10.2196/22659
pmc: PMC8075043
doi:

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02659280']

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e22659

Informations de copyright

©Ann Van de Winckel, Tanjila Nawshin, Casey Byron. Originally published in JMIR Formative Research (http://formative.jmir.org), 18.03.2021.

Références

Health Mark Q. 1996;14(2):73-84
pubmed: 10164449
J Physiother. 2014 Sep;60(3):151-6
pubmed: 25092418
J Med Internet Res. 2013 Aug 12;15(8):e159
pubmed: 23939401
PeerJ. 2015 Jul 21;3:e1102
pubmed: 26244112
Health Educ Res. 2011 Oct;26(5):908-22
pubmed: 21734226
Phys Ther. 2002 Jun;82(6):557-65
pubmed: 12036397
Phys Ther Sport. 2020 May;43:36-42
pubmed: 32066107
Prev Chronic Dis. 2014 Apr 17;11:E62
pubmed: 24742395
Anaesthesia. 2020 Jul;75(7):935-944
pubmed: 32259288
J Physiother. 2019 Apr;65(2):81-87
pubmed: 30926400
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998 Sep;79(9):1122-8
pubmed: 9749695
Clin Rehabil. 2017 Apr;31(4):465-477
pubmed: 27301799
Psychol Methods. 2002 Mar;7(1):105-25
pubmed: 11928886
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Feb 24;17(2):e52
pubmed: 25803266
J Appl Behav Anal. 2020 Jan;53(1):237-248
pubmed: 30924148
JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. 2017 Jul 20;4(2):e6
pubmed: 28729234
Br J Sports Med. 2016 Feb;50(4):255-6
pubmed: 26130696
J Physiother. 2017 Jul;63(3):161-167
pubmed: 28662834
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2013 Jun;92(6):472-81; quiz 482-5
pubmed: 23552335
Spine J. 2013 Dec;13(12):1940-50
pubmed: 24169445
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Dec 15;25(24):3167-77
pubmed: 11124733
Public Health Rep. 2010 Sep-Oct;125(5):626-7
pubmed: 20873276
Res Gerontol Nurs. 2020 Nov 1;13(6):289-296
pubmed: 32286669
Arch Fam Med. 1993 Mar;2(3):301-5
pubmed: 8252151

Auteurs

Ann Van de Winckel (A)

Division of Physical Therapy, Division of Rehabilitation Science, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Medical School, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.

Tanjila Nawshin (T)

Division of Rehabilitation Science, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Medical School, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.

Casey Byron (C)

Hennepin County Medical Center, Minneapolis, MN, United States.

Classifications MeSH