Randomly amplified polymorphic DNA analysis of
Staphylococcus chromogenes
mastitis
methicillin resistance
non-aureus staphylococci
randomly amplified polymorphic DNA
Journal
Veterinary world
ISSN: 0972-8988
Titre abrégé: Vet World
Pays: India
ID NLM: 101504872
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jan 2021
Jan 2021
Historique:
received:
13
07
2020
accepted:
14
12
2020
entrez:
1
3
2021
pubmed:
2
3
2021
medline:
2
3
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
In recent times, non-aureus staphylococci (NAS) have emerged as the major organisms isolated from mastitis cases in dairy animals, with a predominance of Thirty-seven The amplified DNA fragments ranged from 150 to 3000 base pairs and yielded several RAPD profiles. Further analysis using Digital Image Correlation Engine correlation coefficient and UPGMA method showed that the 37 isolates could be classified into 12 distinct RAPD types (A to L) at 62% similarity ( In the absence of defined multilocus sequence type protocols or sufficient sequences available in the public domain, RAPD can be employed to determine genetic diversity of
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND AND AIM
OBJECTIVE
In recent times, non-aureus staphylococci (NAS) have emerged as the major organisms isolated from mastitis cases in dairy animals, with a predominance of
MATERIALS AND METHODS
METHODS
Thirty-seven
RESULTS
RESULTS
The amplified DNA fragments ranged from 150 to 3000 base pairs and yielded several RAPD profiles. Further analysis using Digital Image Correlation Engine correlation coefficient and UPGMA method showed that the 37 isolates could be classified into 12 distinct RAPD types (A to L) at 62% similarity (
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
In the absence of defined multilocus sequence type protocols or sufficient sequences available in the public domain, RAPD can be employed to determine genetic diversity of
Identifiants
pubmed: 33642816
doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2021.285-291
pii: Vetworld-14-285
pmc: PMC7896888
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
285-291Informations de copyright
Copyright: © Sheela, et al.
Références
J Dairy Sci. 2009 Oct;92(10):4962-70
pubmed: 19762813
J Dairy Sci. 2019 Feb;102(2):1571-1583
pubmed: 30591326
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1993 Apr 15;202(8):1230-6
pubmed: 8496076
Microbiol Res. 2004;159(3):245-55
pubmed: 15462524
Lett Appl Microbiol. 2013 Sep;57(3):181-6
pubmed: 23659178
J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia. 2011 Dec;16(4):357-72
pubmed: 21968538
J Dairy Sci. 2011 May;94(5):2329-40
pubmed: 21524522
Vet Microbiol. 2009 Feb 16;134(1-2):73-81
pubmed: 18950969
J Vet Med Sci. 1997 Jun;59(6):443-50
pubmed: 9234218
Vet Microbiol. 2011 May 12;150(1-2):173-9
pubmed: 21333468
Vet Microbiol. 2009 Feb 16;134(1-2):65-72
pubmed: 18950962
Am J Clin Pathol. 1966 Apr;45(4):493-6
pubmed: 5325707
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2010 Aug;65(8):1576-82
pubmed: 20525989
Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2014 Jun;11(6):468-77
pubmed: 24796216
J Dairy Sci. 2016 Dec;99(12):9560-9569
pubmed: 27771092
Epidemiol Infect. 1997 Oct;119(2):261-9
pubmed: 9363026
Front Microbiol. 2016 Dec 20;7:1990
pubmed: 28066335
Vet Microbiol. 2011 Aug 26;152(1-2):112-6
pubmed: 21561725
J Dairy Sci. 2017 Jun;100(6):4797-4806
pubmed: 28434736
Vet Microbiol. 2012 Feb 24;155(1):62-71
pubmed: 21889271
J Clin Microbiol. 1988 Nov;26(11):2465-6
pubmed: 3069867