On the Multimodal Path to Language: The Relationship Between Rhythmic Movements and Deictic Gestures at the End of the First Year.

deictic gestures gestures acquisition language development multimodalily rhythmic movement

Journal

Frontiers in psychology
ISSN: 1664-1078
Titre abrégé: Front Psychol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101550902

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2021
Historique:
received: 13 10 2020
accepted: 18 01 2021
entrez: 1 3 2021
pubmed: 2 3 2021
medline: 2 3 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The aim of this study is to analyze the relationship between rhythmic movements and deictic gestures at the end of the first year of life, and to focus on their unimodal or multimodal character. We hypothesize that multimodal rhythmic movement performed with an object in the hand can facilitate the transition to the first deictic gestures. Twenty-three children were observed at 9 and 12 months of age in a naturalistic play situation with their mother or father. Results showed that rhythmic movements with objects in the hand are a frequent behavior in children's repertoires. Rhythmic behaviors tend to decrease from 9 to 12 months, specifically when they are unimodal. Multimodal rhythmic behavior production at 9 months is positively related with proximal deictic gestures 3 months later. Multimodal rhythmic movements are not directly related to distal deictic gestures, but are indirectly related via proximal deictic gestures. These results highlight the relevance of multimodal behaviors in the transition to the use of early gestures, and can be considered as a transitional phenomenon between the instrumental action and early communicative gestures.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33643145
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.616812
pmc: PMC7902703
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

616812

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 Murillo, Montero and Casla.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Références

Shinrigaku Kenkyu. 1999 Feb;69(6):433-40
pubmed: 10341372
Child Dev. 2004 Jul-Aug;75(4):1053-66
pubmed: 15260864
Cognition. 2005 Jul;96(3):B101-13
pubmed: 15996556
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2018 Sep 19;61(9):2235-2245
pubmed: 30090947
Front Psychol. 2019 Jun 12;10:1259
pubmed: 31244716
Dev Psychol. 2014 Jun;50(6):1660-6
pubmed: 24588517
Infant Behav Dev. 2017 Nov;49:168-181
pubmed: 28946022
Psychol Sci. 2005 May;16(5):367-71
pubmed: 15869695
Infancy. 2019 Mar;24(2):228-248
pubmed: 32677199
Behav Res Methods. 2009 Aug;41(3):841-9
pubmed: 19587200
Infant Behav Dev. 2015 May;39:42-52
pubmed: 25756420
Front Psychol. 2018 Jun 28;9:1109
pubmed: 30002643
Brain Lang. 2007 Jun;101(3):198-207
pubmed: 17196644
J Child Lang. 2010 Mar;37(2):229-61
pubmed: 20096145
Dev Sci. 2020 Jan;23(1):e12843
pubmed: 31045301
Lang Cogn Process. 2009 Feb 1;24(2):190
pubmed: 20126299
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2015 Dec;49(4):737-56
pubmed: 25715826
Child Dev. 2007 May-Jun;78(3):705-22
pubmed: 17516997
Anim Behav. 1981 Feb;29(1):3-11
pubmed: 7235314
Dev Sci. 2009 Jan;12(1):182-7
pubmed: 19120426

Auteurs

Eva Murillo (E)

Departamento de Psicología Básica, Facultad of Psicología, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.

Ignacio Montero (I)

Departamento de Psicología Social y Metodología, Facultad de Psicología, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.

Marta Casla (M)

Departamento de Psicología Evolutiva y de la Educación, Facultad de Psicología, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.

Classifications MeSH