Nitrogen Use Efficiency in Durum Wheat Under Different Nitrogen and Water Regimes in the Mediterranean Basin.
Triticum turgidum spp. durum
heritability
nitrogen uptake efficiency (NUpE)
nitrogen utilization efficiency (NUtE)
post anthesis nitrogen uptake (PANU)
water use efficiency (wue)
Journal
Frontiers in plant science
ISSN: 1664-462X
Titre abrégé: Front Plant Sci
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101568200
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
16
09
2020
accepted:
28
12
2020
entrez:
1
3
2021
pubmed:
2
3
2021
medline:
2
3
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Improving nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) represents one of the main goals to reduce N input in maximizing crop yield for sustainable agriculture. A NUE key strategy is the exploitation of genetic variation in available germplasm together with the understanding of molecular mechanisms governing this complex trait. Thus, NUE, its components, nitrogen uptake efficiency (NUpE) and nitrogen utilization efficiency (NUtE), and NUE-related traits heritability were evaluated in ancient (Cappelli, Capeiti, Russello, and Mazzancoio) and modern (Messapia, Tiziana, Svevo, and Normanno) wheat genotypes for tackling nitrogen (N) and/or water limitation in both growth chamber and field experiments. Our results exhibited a reduction of NUE, NUpE, and NUtE under water and combined (nitrogen + water) stress in all the genotypes, as expected. The contribution of genetic variability on phenotypic variation was significant for NUtE, harvest index, post-anthesis nitrogen uptake (PANU), and biomass production traits. Moreover, the stress tolerance indexes, calculated and bi-plotted for N and water stresses, exhibited two distinct clusters for many traits as then confirmed by principal component analysis. Although modern varieties showed higher crop yield and NUE under conventional N and water regimes, ancient varieties exhibited best performances to cope with both stresses, mainly under water limitation. Finally, the usage index, which takes into account total biomass increase, underlined that old genotypes were less affected by both stresses during crop cycle. In particular, these genotypes showed the best performances for NUE and its components under both stresses at stem elongation and milk ripening as shown also by PANU. In addition, at these stages, nitrate and ammonium transporter gene expressions in the root were performed, showing the highest activity in ancient varieties. In conclusion, the identification of NUE traits during a specific crop cycle stage, under both N and water limitation, will help in the breeding of more resilient varieties in Mediterranean sustainable agriculture by reducing N supply.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33643329
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.607226
pmc: PMC7902889
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
607226Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 Lupini, Preiti, Badagliacca, Abenavoli, Sunseri, Monti and Bacchi.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
J Exp Bot. 2019 Sep 24;70(18):4931-4948
pubmed: 31189018
Front Genet. 2020 Apr 21;11:217
pubmed: 32373150
Trends Plant Sci. 2004 Dec;9(12):597-605
pubmed: 15564127
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Nov 5;110(45):18185-9
pubmed: 24145428
Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2019 Jun;49:35-42
pubmed: 31176099
Plant Biotechnol J. 2014 Feb;12(2):219-30
pubmed: 24151921
Ann Bot. 2010 Jun;105(7):1141-57
pubmed: 20299346
J Exp Bot. 2010 Jul;61(12):3211-22
pubmed: 20525798
J Exp Bot. 2017 May 1;68(10):2627-2632
pubmed: 28338945
Trends Ecol Evol. 2011 May;26(5):229-35
pubmed: 21397975
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2003 Sep;14(9):1478-80
pubmed: 14733002
Front Plant Sci. 2015 Oct 02;6:815
pubmed: 26483827
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 17;11(2):e0149668
pubmed: 26886933
Plant Biotechnol J. 2012 Dec;10(9):1011-25
pubmed: 22607381
Front Plant Sci. 2020 Apr 28;11:474
pubmed: 32411159
Annu Rev Genet. 2015;49:269-89
pubmed: 26421509
Plants (Basel). 2019 Apr 30;8(5):
pubmed: 31052327
BMC Evol Biol. 2014 Jan 20;14:11
pubmed: 24438197
J Exp Bot. 2010 May;61(9):2293-302
pubmed: 20237091
Funct Plant Biol. 2002 May;29(5):537-546
pubmed: 32689499
Trends Plant Sci. 2018 Nov;23(11):1029-1037
pubmed: 30249481
Plant Physiol Biochem. 2016 Oct;107:21-32
pubmed: 27235648
Plant Sci. 2021 Feb;303:110759
pubmed: 33487345
J Exp Bot. 2011 Feb;62(4):1499-509
pubmed: 20926552
J Exp Bot. 2007;58(9):2369-87
pubmed: 17556767
PLoS One. 2016 Nov 1;11(11):e0165733
pubmed: 27802318
J Exp Bot. 2010 Oct;61(15):4303-12
pubmed: 20679251
Theor Appl Genet. 2013 Dec;126(12):3035-48
pubmed: 24057081
Methods. 2001 Dec;25(4):402-8
pubmed: 11846609
Front Plant Sci. 2017 Sep 21;8:1634
pubmed: 28983307
Plant Physiol. 2004 Jan;134(1):388-400
pubmed: 14671012
J Integr Plant Biol. 2020 Apr;62(4):487-508
pubmed: 31087763
J Exp Bot. 2015 Sep;66(18):5519-30
pubmed: 26071535
Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2012;63:153-82
pubmed: 22224450