The Nairobi Pork Value Chain: Mapping and Assessment of Governance, Challenges, and Food Safety Issues.

Nairobi challenges food safety food system governance mapping pork value chain

Journal

Frontiers in veterinary science
ISSN: 2297-1769
Titre abrégé: Front Vet Sci
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101666658

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2021
Historique:
received: 08 07 2020
accepted: 14 01 2021
entrez: 1 3 2021
pubmed: 2 3 2021
medline: 2 3 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The Nairobi pork food system is a growing livestock sub-sector which serves as a source of food and livelihood to its inhabitants. The study aimed to map Nairobi's pork value chains, assess their governance, operational challenges and their impacts on food safety risks and management practices. Qualitative data were collected in seven focus group discussions and 10 key informants' interviews on animal movements and product flows, stakeholders' interactions, perceptions on system governance and challenges, and on their potential impact on food safety management. Quantitative data were obtained to show the importance of flows, business operations and market share. Thematic analysis was conducted to identify themes that provide understanding on the governance, challenges and food safety practices in each profile. The predominant chains identified were [1] The "large integrated company" profile which accounted for 83.6% of pork marketed through abattoirs, and was based on a well-structured supply system, with owned farms (representing 50% of their supply), contract farms and semi-contract farms and [2] Local independent abattoirs, accounting for 16.4%, are privately owned small-scale production, supplied mainly (70%) by small farmers from the immediate neighboring areas. The main challenges associated with governance themes included; (i) Inadequate/lack of enforcement of existing regulation (ii) Negative effect of devolution system of governance (iii) Pig traders' dominance (iii) Lack of association at all system nodes, and (iv) Male dominance across the pig system. The main challenges reported included; (i) Lack of capital to upscale (ii) Poor infrastructure (iii) Pig shortage (iv) Excessive regulation (v) Lack of training (vi) Diseases (v) Lack of knowledge (vi) Unfair competition. Food safety themes were associated with (i) Inadequate slaughter facilities forcing traders/farmers to undertake home slaughter (ii) Lack of knowledge on disease management (iii) Lack of training on hygienic practices in the slaughterhouse and (iv) Lack/insufficient capital to purchase equipment's to ensure proper hygiene e.g., boilers. The study provides insights into the structure of the pork system supplying Nairobi, the governance issues important to the stakeholders, challenges and food safety issues. The framework obtained can be used by policy makers and researchers to investigate and develop pork industry and for food safety and disease control programmes.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33644142
doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.581376
pmc: PMC7902891
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

581376

Subventions

Organisme : Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
ID : BB/L019019/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : G1100783
Pays : United Kingdom

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 Murungi, Muloi, Muinde, Githigia, Akoko, Fèvre, Rushton and Alarcon.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Références

Trop Anim Health Prod. 2010 Jun;42(5):865-73
pubmed: 19916053
BMC Vet Res. 2013 Mar 07;9:46
pubmed: 23497587
Prev Vet Med. 2018 Nov 1;159:203-210
pubmed: 30314783
Prev Vet Med. 2017 Nov 1;147:90-99
pubmed: 29254731
Trop Anim Health Prod. 2012 Aug;44(6):1157-62
pubmed: 22219174
Trop Anim Health Prod. 2015 Feb;47(2):369-76
pubmed: 25448534
Trop Anim Health Prod. 2013 Oct;45(7):1533-8
pubmed: 23504593
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2010 Sep 27;365(1554):2853-67
pubmed: 20713389
Agric Syst. 2017 Mar;152:1-17
pubmed: 28260829
J Nutr. 2003 Nov;133(11 Suppl 2):3907S-3910S
pubmed: 14672289
Parasite Epidemiol Control. 2019 Feb 07;4:e00093
pubmed: 30847409
Prev Vet Med. 2020 Jun;179:105009
pubmed: 32438204
Agric Syst. 2018 Nov;167:47-60
pubmed: 30739979
Front Vet Sci. 2017 Oct 25;4:171
pubmed: 29164137
Prev Vet Med. 2004 May 14;63(3-4):183-95
pubmed: 15158570
Agric Syst. 2018 Jan;159:1-8
pubmed: 31007360

Auteurs

Maurice K Murungi (MK)

International Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya.

Dishon M Muloi (DM)

International Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya.

Patrick Muinde (P)

International Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya.

Samuel Maina Githigia (SM)

Department of Veterinary Parasitology Microbiology and Pathology, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya.

James Akoko (J)

International Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya.

Eric M Fèvre (EM)

International Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya.
Institute for Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.

Jonathan Rushton (J)

Institute for Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
London Centre of Integrated Research in Agriculture and Health, London, United Kingdom.
Royal Veterinary College, University of London, London, United Kingdom.

Pablo Alarcon (P)

London Centre of Integrated Research in Agriculture and Health, London, United Kingdom.
Royal Veterinary College, University of London, London, United Kingdom.

Classifications MeSH