Uroflowmetry pattern in detrusor underactivity and bladder outlet obstruction in male patients with lower urinary tract symptoms.
bladder outlet obstruction
detrusor underactivity
uroflowmetry
Journal
Lower urinary tract symptoms
ISSN: 1757-5672
Titre abrégé: Low Urin Tract Symptoms
Pays: Australia
ID NLM: 101506777
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jul 2021
Jul 2021
Historique:
revised:
11
02
2021
received:
14
01
2021
accepted:
15
02
2021
pubmed:
2
3
2021
medline:
29
10
2021
entrez:
1
3
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To investigate if uroflowmetry (UFM) curve patterns could differentiate between detrusor underactivity (DU) and bladder outlet obstruction (BOO). A hundred consecutive data sets of male patients who were evaluated using UFM and invasive urodynamics (pressure flow study) were retrospectively collected. DU and BOO were diagnosed according to the bladder contractility index and BOO index. The UFM curve with two or more notches was defined as sawtooth pattern, and the interrupted pattern was defined if several curves with interruptions reducing to zero were noted. We also compared other UFM parameters including maximum and average flow rates (Qmax and Qave), voiding time, time to Qmax, the slope to first peak flow, the number of notches on the curve (sawtooth pattern), the number of curves (interrupted pattern), and the maximum drop on the sawtooth pattern. Twenty-five and forty-nine patients were categorized in the BOO group and the DU group, respectively. The incidence of sawtooth pattern was significantly higher in the DU group (57%) than in the BOO group (32%), while the incidence of interrupted pattern was not different between the two groups (36% in the BOO group and 49% in the DU group). There were significant differences in age (area under the curve = 0.75), prostatic volume (0.67), the slope to first peak flow (0.58), the number of notches on the curve (0.61), and the maximum drop (0.76) between the two groups. The sawtooth UFM pattern is more common in patients with DU than in those with BOO. New parameters on UFM curve patterns could be helpful to evaluate DU and BOO without invasive urodynamics.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
361-365Informations de copyright
© 2021 John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.
Références
Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, et al. The standardization of the terminology of lower urinary tract function: report from the standardisation sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Neurourol Urodyn. 2002;21:167-178.
Austin PF, Bauer SB, Bower W, et al. The standardization of terminology of lower urinary tract function in children and adolescents: update report from the standardization committee of the International Children's Continence Society. Neurourol Urodyn. 2016;35:471-481.
D'Ancona C, Haylen B, Oelke M, et al. The International Continence Society (ICS) report on the terminology for adult male lower urinary tract and pelvic floor symptoms and dysfunction. Neurourol Urodyn. 2019;38:433-477.
Matsukawa Y, Yoshida M, Yamaguchi O, et al. Clinical characteristics and useful signs to differentiate detrusor underactivity from bladder outlet obstruction in men with non-neurogenic lower urinary tract symptoms. Int J Urol. 2020;27:47-52.
Takahashi R, Takei M, Namitome R, Yamaguchi O, Eto M. Symptoms and noninvasive test parameters that clinically differentiate detrusor underactivity from bladder outlet obstruction without a pressure-flow-based diagnosis in men with lower urinary tract symptoms. Neurourol Urodyn. 2020;40:303-309. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.24558.
Namitome R, Takei M, Takahashi R, et al. A prediction model of detrusor underactivity based on symptoms and noninvasive test parameters in men with lower urinary tract symptoms: an analysis of a large group of patients undergoing pressure-flow studies. J Urol. 2020;203:779-785.
Rosier PFWM, Donkelaar CS, Kort LMO. Clinical epidemiology: detrusor voiding contraction maximum power, related to ageing. Urology. 2019;124:72-77.
Madersbacher S, Klingler HC, Djavan B, et al. Is obstruction predictable by clinical evaluation in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms? Br J Urol. 1997;80:72-77.
Rosier PFWM, de la Rosette JJMCH. Is there a correlation between prostate size and bladder-outlet obstruction. World J Urol. 1995;13:9-13.
Wadie BS, Ibrahim EI, Rosette JJ, Gomh MA, Ghoneim MA. The relationship of the international prostate symptom score and objective parameters for diagnosing bladder outlet obstruction. Part1: when statistics fail. J Urol. 2001;165:32-34.
Reynard JM, Yang Q, Donovan JL, et al. The ICS-'BPH' Study: uroflowmetry, lower urinary tract symptoms and bladder outlet obstruction. Br J Urol. 1998;82:619-623.
Szmydki D, Burzyński B, Sołtysiak-Gibała Z, et al. Prediction of detrusor underactivity based on non-invasive functional tests and clinical data in patients with symptoms of bladder outlet obstruction. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2020;24:10992-10998.